D.M. Abd El-Aziz et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 1048 (2013) 487–499
497
Table 4
Bond distances of metal complexes obtained from the PM3 calculations.
Bond lengths and
angle
Cu
complex
Bond lengths and
angle
Fe
complex
Bond lengths and
angle
Co
complex
Bond lengths and
angle
Ni
complex
Bond lengths and
angle
Zn
complex
Cu18AN10
Cu18AN17
Cu18AN28
Cu18AN35
Cu18AO36
Cu18AO39
1.877 Fe18AN10
1.874
1.858
2.000
1.985
2.263
2.249
86.3
93.3
88.2
102.0
169.9
94.3
91.2
171.6
85.8
174.4
83.7
80.9
90.8
98.3
85.8
Co18AN10
Co18AN17
Co18AO27
Co18ACl19
N10ACo18AN17
N10ACo18ACl19
N10ACo18AO27
N17ACo18ACl19
N17ACo18AO27
Cl19ACo18AO27
1.874
1.901
2.064
2.234
88.8
175.8
99.1
88.6
Ni49AN10
Ni49AN17
Ni49AN27
Ni49AN34
Ni49AO47
Ni49AO40
1.906
1.876
1.890
1.876
1.860
1.861
90.3
177.2
92.5
90.3
92.2
92.0
94.2
168.6
82.9
Zn18AN10
Zn18AN17
Zn18AN28
Zn18AN35
Zn18AO41
Zn18AO48
1.949
1.911
1.982
2.001
1.901
1.856
76.7
176.6
102.1
86.4
100.9
100.1
85.4
91.2
172.8
76.0
1854
Fe18AN17
1.855 Fe18AO31
1.895 Fe18AO21
1.876 Fe18ACl19
1.889 Fe18ACl20
N10ACu18AN17
N10ACu18AN28
N10ACu18AN35
N10ACu18AO36
N10ACu18AO39
N17ACu18AN28
N17ACu18AN35
N17ACu18AO36
N17ACu18AO39
N28ACu18AN35
N28ACu18AO36
N28ACu18AO39
N35ACu18AO36
N35ACu18AO39
O36ACu18AO39
79.9
N10AFe18AN17
N10A Fe18ACl19
N10A Fe18ACl20
N10AFe18AO21
N10AFe18AO31
N17AFe18ACl19
N17AFe18ACl20
N17AFe18AO21
N17AFe18AO31
Cl19AFe18ACl20
Cl19AFe18AO21
Cl19AFe18AO31
Cl20AFe18AO21
Cl20AFe18AO31
Cl21AFe18AO31
N10ANi49AN17
N10ANi49AN27
N10ANi49AN34
N10ANi49AO40
N10ANi49AO47
N17ANi49AN27
N17ANi49AN34
N17ANi49AO40
N17ANi49AO47
N27ANi49-N34
N27ANi49AO40
N27ANi49AO47
N34ANi49AO40
N34ANi49AO47
O40ANi49AO47
N10AZn18AN17
N10AZn18AN28
N10AZn18AN35
N10AZn18AO41
N10AZn18AO48
N17AZn18AN28
N17AZn18AN35
N17AZn18AO41
N17AZn18AO48
N28AZn18AN35
N28AZn18AO41
N28AZn18AO48
N35AZn18AO41
N35AZn18AO48
O41AZn18AO48
174.5
99.1
97.4
86.7
104.9
90.5
175.7
90.3
78.3
77.9
95.9
93.2
174.2
86.2
118.5
85.1
88.9
87.1
86.5
97.2
174.5
85.6
95.2
82.0
169.8
88.4
95.5
band, observed at 460 nm (21,739 cmꢁ1), is due to ligand metal
charge transfer (LMCT) [10]. The electronic spectrum of the Fe(III)
complex displays absorption bands at 660 nm (15,152 cmꢁ1),
575 nm (17,391 cmꢁ1) and 490 nm (20,408 cmꢁ1). These bands
are attributed to 6A1g ? 4T1g (G), 6A1g ? 4T2g (G) and 6A1g ? 4Eg
(G), respectively. The number, position and assignment of the d-d
transition bands are consistent with a six-coordinated octahedral
2.02 corresponds to low spin iron (III). On the other hand, the weak
signal with g-value at 3.73 is known to be characteristic of dis-
torted high spin iron (III) [41,42]. These two signals confirm the
probability of the equilibrium between high and low spin states.
3.8. Molecular modeling
geometry [36]. The spectra show also
a band at 420 nm
Geometric and electronic structure of the Schiff base and its me-
tal complexes are calculated by the optimization of their bond
lengths, bond angles and dihedral angles. The optimized molecular
structure of the Schiff base with minimum energy obtained from
the calculations is shown in Fig. 7. The photoinduced charge redis-
tribution over the whole molecular skeleton of the Schiff base is
well represented by plot of the Frontier molecular orbitals (HOMO
and LUMO) as illustrated in Fig. 8. EHOMO is a quantum chemical
descriptor which is often associated with the electron donating
ability of the molecule. High value of EHOMO indicates a tendency
of the molecule to donate electrons to appropriate acceptor mole-
cule of low empty molecular orbital energy. However, ELUMO indi-
cates the ability of the molecule to accept electrons. It is well
known that the lower value of ELUMO, the more probable for the
molecule to accept electrons [43]. The HOMO electronic density
distribution for the Schiff base can be represented as localization
of charge density on the bridging nitrogen atom, sulfur and nitrogen
atoms of benzothiazole moiety. In the case of LUMO level, the
charge is mostly localized that can facilitate the back donation from
the metal ion to azomethine group. Quantum chemical parameters
(23,810 cmꢁ1) which may be attributed to ligand-metal charge
transfer. The magnetic moment of 4.17 BM for the Fe(III) complex
suggests the presence of a mixture of high spin as well as low spin
states [37]. The electronic absorption spectrum of the green Co(II)
complex exhibits band at 680 nm (14,706 cmꢁ1). This band can be
assigned to the transitions 4A2 (F) ? 4T1 (P) and a band at 620 nm
(16,129 cmꢁ1
) due to spin coupling. The band at 465 nm
(21,505 cmꢁ1) can be assigned to charge transfer transition. These
transitions as well as the measured value of magnetic moment
(leff = 4.69 BM) suggest a tetrahedral structure around Co(II) com-
plex [24,26,38]. The electronic absorption spectrum of the brown
Ni(II) complex shows absorption bands at 590 nm (16949 cmꢁ1
)
)
3
and 365 nm (27397 cmꢁ1) assignable to A2g (F) ? 3T1g (F) (m2
3
and A2g (F) ? 3T1g (P) (
m
3) transitions, respectively [33,39]. It is
noted that the low energy A2g (F) ? 3T2g (P) (
m1) transition is not
3
observed in the spectra. This is believed to be in the near infrared
and it is out of the range of the used instrument. The high energy
band at 265 nm (37,736 cmꢁ1) may be assigned to charge transfer
band. The magnetic moment value (2.75 BM) is consistent with
octahedral geometry around Ni(II). The electronic transition spec-
trum of the brown Zn(II) complex exhibits shoulder band at
460 nm (21,739 cmꢁ1). This band can be attributed to the LMCT
transition and it is consistent with octahedral geometry [40]. The
Zn(II) complex is found to be diamagnetic as expected for d10
configuration.
(EHOMO, ELUMO and the energy gap,
DE = ELUMO–EHOMO) are found to
be ꢁ9.6211, ꢁ4.645779 and 4.975321 e.v, respectively. Molecular
modeling studies using PM3 calculations are performed to gain a
better understanding of geometrical structures of the investigated
complexes (Fig. 9). The Cu, Ni and Zn-complexes acquire N4O2
geometry but Fe-complex exhibits N2O2Cl2 geometry. The bond dis-
tances of the Ni-complex are in the range of 1.86–1.90 Å and the
bond angles are nearly 90°. However, N10ANi49AN17 bond angle
equals to 177.2° indicating octahedral geometry. On the other hand,
the coordination environment around the Cu and Zn-complexes are
slightly distorted octahedral geometry as indicated by the bond
lengths and angles (Table 4). The Fe-complex exhibits distorted
octahedral structure due to the presence of the axial chloride ions
with bond lengths of 2.24–2.26 Å (Table 4). The energy minimiza-
tion results of square planar and tetrahedral structures of Co-com-
3.7. EPR
The EPR spectrum of Cu(II) complex at room temperature
(300 K) (Fig. 6) exhibits a symmetrical singlet line characteristic
of isotropic pattern with only one value gisotropic = 2.049. The g-va-
lue and the pattern of EPR spectrum suggest octahedral geometry
around Cu(II). The EPR spectrum of Fe(III) complex exhibits a broad
signal of axial symmetry with hyperfine structure. The g-value at