M. Uchiyama et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 42 (2001) 4653–4656
4655
Scheme 3. Reagents and conditions: (a) DIBAL-H, toluene, −78°C; (b) Bu3SnH, AIBN, benzene, reflux, 7: 13% from 4, 8: 44%
from 4; (c) PCC, CH2Cl2, rt; (d) NaBH4, EtOH, −15°C, 69% from 7; (e) (R)-1-(1-naphthyl)ethyl isocyanate, N,N-dimethyl-
aminoethanol, benzene, 60°C, 9: 73%, 10: 22%; (f) LiAlH4, THF, rt, (−)-8: 86% from 9, (+)-8: 78% from 10; (g) Ph3P, imidazole,
,
I2, benzene, 60°C, 87%; (h) DBU, rt ; (i) THF, 40% H2SO4, rt, 72% from 11; (e) PCC, NaOAc, MS 4 A, CH2Cl2, rt, 77%.
of dihydroclerodin are currently underway in our labor-
atory.
9 and minor 10 were separately treated with LiAlH4 to
provide optically pure (−)-812 and (+)-8,12 respectively.
Thus, the absolute stereochemistry of the major
diastereomer obtained from the reaction in Scheme 2
was confirmed at this stage. Unfortunately, the major
product (−)-8 corresponded with (1R,5S) antipode
instead of our target (1S,5R)-1; however, we proceeded
in the transformation of (−)-8 into (1R,5S)-1 in order
to demonstrate the synthetic route leading to optically
active 1.
References
1. For a review, see: Schuda, P. F. Top. Curr. Chem. 1980,
91, 75–111.
2. For reviews on clerodanes, see: (a) van Beeck, T. A.; de
Groot, Ae. Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas 1986, 105, 513–
527; (b) Merritt, A. T.; Ley, S. V. Nat. Prod. Rep. 1992,
243–287.
(−)-8 was converted to exo iodide 11, the iodine atom
of which was in the suitable orientation for controlling
the regiochemistry in the next elimination step. Treat-
ment of 11 with DBU afforded the 2,3-dihydrofuran
intermediate, which was hydrated without isolation
because of its volatility to provide lactol 12 as an
inseparable mixture of epimers. Oxidation of 12 with
PCC gave (1R,5S)-1,6a,13 the enantiomeric purity of
which was determined to be >98% ee by 1H NMR
analysis upon comparison with racemic 114 using (R)-
(−)-2,2,2-trifluoro-1-(anthryl)ethanol as the chiral sol-
vating reagent.15 It should be also mentioned that the
optical purity of our synthetic (1R,5S)-1 is higher than
those reported in the literature.6a,13
3. (a) Barton, D. H. R.; Cheung, H. T.; Cross, A. D.;
Jackman, L. M.; Martin-Smith, M. J. Chem. Soc. 1961,
5061–5073; (b) Hosozawa, S.; Kato, N.; Munakata, K.
Phytochemistry 1973, 12, 1833–1834.
4. (a) Hochlowski, J.; Faulkner, D. J.; Matsumoto, G.;
Clardy, J. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 1141–1142; (b) Tak-
izawa, P. A.; Yucel, J. K.; Veit, B.; Faulkner, D. J.;
Deerinck, T.; Soto, G.; Ellisman, M.; Malhotra, V. Cell
1993, 73, 1079–1090.
5. Vader, J.; Sengers, H.; de Groot, A. Tetrahedron 1989,
45, 2131–2142 and references cited therein.
6. (a) Petit, F.; Furstoss, R. Synthesis 1995, 1517–1520; (b)
Enders, D.; Va´zquez, J.; Raabe, G. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1999, 701–702.
7. Uchiyama, M.; Satoh, S.; Ohta, A. Tetrahedron Lett.
In conclusion, we have accomplished the synthesis of
enantiomerically pure (1R,5S)-1 and presented herein a
new approach to optically active perhydrofuro[2,3-b]-
furan derivatives using the asymmetric oxyselenenyla-
tion of 2,3-dihydrofuran (2). Although the diastereo-
selectivity of the key reaction shown in Scheme 2 is not
so high and the obtained (1R,5S)-1 is the antipode of
our original target, it is supposed that these problems
could be solved by optimization of the starting di-
selenide. Further studies directed towards an improve-
ment of the diastereoselectivity and the total synthesis
2001, 42, 1559–1562.
8. Uchiyama, M.; Oka, M.; Harai, S.; Ohta, A. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2001, 42, 1931–1934.
9. All new compounds were characterized by 1H, 13C, IR,
and mass spectrometric analysis.
10. Presumably, unreacted seleniranium cation and/or oxo-
carbonium cation reacted with H2O, which was added as
an aqueous solution of NaHCO3 in quenching the reac-
tion, to give lactol 6.
11. Pirkle, W. H.; Hoekstra, M. S. J. Org. Chem. 1974, 39,
3904–3906.