J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 10117-10118
Complete Structure of the Mycolactones
10117
Steve Fidanze,† Fengbin Song,† Magali Szlosek-Pinaud,†
P. L. C. Small,‡ and Yoshito Kishi*,†
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology
HarVard UniVersity, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138
Department of Microbiology, UniVersity of Tennessee
KnoxVille, Tennessee 37996
Figure 1. I (Z-∆4′,5′), mycolactone A; II (E-∆4′,5′), mycolactone B.
ReceiVed July 27, 2001
The mycolactones were isolated in 1999 by Small and
co-workers1 from Mycobacterium ulcerans, the causative pathogen
of Buruli ulcer. This disease is characterized by the formation of
large, painless, necrotic ulcers and the lack of an acute inflam-
matory response. Evidence from animal studies suggests that the
mycolactones are directly responsible for the observed pathology,
and they have attracted considerable attention for their highly
potent apoptotic activity as well as for being the first examples
of polyketide macrolides to be isolated from a human pathogen.
The gross structure of these natural products was elucidated
through 2D NMR experiments.2 Via a combined approach
employing both an NMR database and the preparation of model
compounds, we recently established the relative and absolute
configuration of the mycolactone core structure (Figure 1).3
Extending the newly developed universal NMR database concept
in chiral solvents4 to a proton NMR database, we report the
complete structure of the mycolactones in this Communication.
In our view, the universal NMR database approach5 is ideally
suited to address the relative stereochemistry at C12′, C13′, and
C15′.6 Thus, we have chosen the diastereomers 1a-d to create
the NMR database to elucidate the relative stereochemistry of
the fatty acid portion of the mycolactones. In practice, all four
Figure 2. Difference in carbon chemical shifts (A) and proton chemical
shifts (B) between 1a-d and mycolactone B in acetone-d6. The x and y
axes represent carbon or proton number and ∆δ (δ1a-d - δmycolactone B in
ppm), respectively.
conjugated systems. Therefore, the protons and carbons within
these conjugated systems were not included for the NMR profile
comparison. As anticipated, the C8′-C11′ carbons and their
attached protons exhibited significant chemical shift differences.7,8
Interestingly, however, these differences were approximately in
the same magnitude for all 1a-d, suggesting the suitability of
the model diastereomers 1a-d for the present study.9
diastereomers 1a-d were synthesized from D-glyceraldehyde
acetonide in an optically active form. The details of the synthesis
and stereochemistry assignment of 1a-d are included in the
Supporting Information.
Obviously, the fatty acid portion of the mycolactones and the
diastereomers 1a-d are structurally different, particularly in their
The 13C NMR profiles in acetone-d6 of each of 1a-d were
compared with those reported for the corresponding portion of
the mycolactones2 (Figure 2A). Through this comparison, it
became evident that the C13′/C15′ relative stereochemistry of the
mycolactones is syn. The 13C NMR profiles of 1a and 1b were
very similar, although 1a appeared to represent the 13C NMR
profile of the mycolactones slightly better than 1b. As noticed
† Harvard University.
‡ University of Tennessee.
(1) (a) George, K. M.; Chatterjee, D.; Gunawardana, G.; Welty, D.;
Hayman, J.; Lee, R.; Small, P. L. C. Science 1999, 283, 854. (b) George, K.
M.; Pascopella, L.; Welty, D. M.; Small, P. L. C. Infect. Immun. 2000, 68,
877. (c) Rohr, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 2847.
(2) Gunawardana, G.; Chatterjee, D.; George, K. M.; Brennan, P.; Whittern,
D.; Small, P. L. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 6092.
1
previously,10 the 13C and H NMR spectra are complementary
(3) Benowitz, A. B.; Fidanze, S.; Small, P. L. C.; Kishi, Y. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2001, 123, 5128.
(7) The 1H and 13C NMR profiles including these nuclei are included in
the Supporting Information.
(4) (a) Kobayashi, Y.; Hayashi, N.; Tan, C.-H.; Kishi, Y. Org. Lett. 2001,
3, 2245. (b) Hayashi, N.; Kobayashi, Y.; Kishi, Y. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2249.
(c) Kobayashi, Y.; Hayashi, N.; Kishi, Y. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2253.
(5) (a) Kobayashi, Y.; Lee, J.; Tezuka, K.; Kishi, Y. Org. Lett. 1999, 1,
2177. (b) Lee, J.; Kobayashi, Y.; Tezuka, K.; Kishi, Y. Org. Lett. 1999, 1,
2181. (c) Kobayashi, Y.; Tan, C.-H.; Kishi, Y. HelV. Chim. Acta 2000, 83,
2562. (d) Kobayashi, Y.; Tan, C.-H.; Kishi, Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000,
39, 4279. (e) Tan, C.-H.; Kobayashi, Y.; Kishi, Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2000, 39, 4282. (f) Kobayashi, Y.; Tan, C.-H.; Kishi, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2001, 123, 2076.
(8) For this purpose, we initially synthesized the four diastereomers of
(Me)2CdCHCH(OH)CH(OH)CH2CH(OH)Me and created the NMR databases.
The 1H and 13C NMR profiles were found to be very similar to those reported
in Figure 2.
(9) Gurjar and Cherian recently reported a synthesis of the protected form
of the fatty acid portion of mycolactones: Gurjar, M. K.; Cherian, J.
Heterocycles 2001, 55, 1095. Although the stereochemistry at C12′, C13′,
and C15′ does not correspond to the one determined in this work, it is worth
noting that the C11′ proton chemical shift difference between 1a (this paper)
and 3 or 4 (the referenced paper) is approximately the same as that between
1a (this paper) and mycolactone A or B.
(6) For the numbering adopted in this paper, see the structures in Figure 1.
10.1021/ja011824z CCC: $20.00 © 2001 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 09/19/2001