ACS Chemical Biology
Articles
backbone and the side chain of Glu401. For both 39b and 2i,
the tertiary amines of R1 formed a salt bridge with Asp26,
which for 2i is enabled by its longer linker assuming a U-turn
conformation. The position and the overall dimensions of the
substituent on ring C, as a thin linker fitting the narrow Eis
cleft, were also preserved in the analogues, whereas the nature
of the substituents was different. An Eis loop spanning residues
25−30 is in two somewhat different conformations in the two
structures, apparently induced by binding of the two different
inhibitors. Most significantly, rotamers of Ile28 and Asp26
differ considerably in the two structures to optimally interact
with the R1 linker and the terminal R1 group, respectively. The
side chain of Arg37 is also in two different conformations,
interacting with either the unmodified ring A of 2i or with the
fluorinated ring A of 39b.
The drastic differences in core orientations, locations of
bound water molecules, and consequently the inhibitor−
protein interactions, which all arise as a result of seemingly
minor chemical differences of the core structures, illustrate
potential serious pitfalls of modeling and computational
docking based on a crystal structure with a similar
pharmacophore. We used the interactions observed in the
crystal structure of Eis in a complex with 2i to design analogues
with the thieno[2,3-d]pyrimidine-containing core.
Figure 3. Chemical structures of all compounds synthesized and
investigated in this study. The three rings of the tricyclic inhibitors in
the library are labeled as A, B, and C for simplicity. The library is
divided into three families (I−III) based on the size of ring A. Further
subdivision of the families is based on R1, R2, and R3 substituents.
Design and Chemical Synthesis of Eis Inhibitors. By
using the guidelines derived from the crystal structure of the
Eis−2i complex and its comparison with the structure of Eis−
39b interactions, as described in the previous section, we made
substitutions on the A−B−C core of 2i (Figure 3; family II) as
well on the same thieno[2,3-d]pyrimidine B−C core but with a
five-membered ring A (Figure 3; family I) as well as a seven-
membered ring A (Figure 3; family III). To explore optimal
filling in the binding pocket for ring A, we modified ring A with
various hydrophobic moieties in family II. In this family, the R3
position in ring A was unsubstituted (H) or substituted with a
methyl, an ethyl, a tert-butyl, or a phenyl group (Figure 3). To
optimize hydrophobic interactions with residues Met65 and
Leu63, we generated molecules in which the R2 position in ring
A was either unsubstituted (H) or substituted with a methyl
group. The analogues were divided into eight series (1−8)
based on the ring A structure, with family I defining series 1,
family II defining series 2−7 with different R2 and R3
substituents on ring A, and family III defining series 8.
Furthermore, within all eight major series, we also installed
side chains R1 on the sulfur of ring C, in which tertiary amino
groups were connected to the sulfur of ring C by an aliphatic
linker (with or without an amide), consistent with the
restrictions of the narrow binding cleft. These tertiary amines
mimic the amino groups of aminoglycoside substrates in the
active site, located in the negatively charged environment of
the Eis active site (Asp26, Glu401, and the C-terminal
carboxyl; Figure 2). We used our previous experience in
diversifying substituents at this binding site to install a
pyrrolidine or a piperidine, which were observed to improve
inhibitor potency in other inhibitors, whereas substituents like
carbonyl, hydroxyl, ether, morpholine, or cyano group were
not well tolerated.20 Here, we varied the size of the terminal
group on R1 (for example, a pyrrolidine vs a piperidine ring),
the position of the nitrogen, for a constant chain length, the
linker length, the presence of an amide bond (imposing
constraints in the R1 side chain and introducing hydrogen
bonding potential). A total of nine R1 variants were generated
Since relatively small hydrophobic substitutions on ring A
were allowed, consistent with its environment, we varied the
size of this ring and the presence and the nature of small
hydrophobic substituents R2 and R3 at two positions on this
ring. The difference in the orientations indicates that the
specific chemical structures of the rings and their substitutions
specify how the inhibitors are bound to the enzyme. Indeed,
ring C in the thieno[2,3-d]pyrimidine core of 2i is decorated
with a primary amino group, absent in 39b, which forms a salt
bridge with the C-terminal carboxyl group of Eis. The primary
amine on ring C is also preserved in all analogues, as it defines
the overall disposition of the core of these the thieno[2,3-
d]pyrimidines in the Eis binding pocket. There is not enough
room to accommodate substitutions on this amino group,
which explains inactivity of library compounds with such
substitutions (Figure S223). The nonpolar sulfur of the central
ring B of 2i is in favorable hydrophobic contact with the side
chain of Ala33 (the Cβ−S distance is 3.6 Å), whereas the
orientation of 39b places its nitrogen-containing ring C
approximately in the same site as the sulfur of 2i but
somewhat closer to the protein surface, enabling water-
mediated hydrogen bonding of this ring with the amide
nitrogens of Ile28 and Gly29. The sulfur-containing ring B is
preserved in the analogues to maintain the interactions of this
ring with Eis. For 2i, a water mediates hydrogen bonding of a
nitrogen of ring C with the side chain of Asp26. In both
structures, the R1 is a thioether-linked side chain on ring C. In
2i, R1 contains an additional amide ultimately connecting to a
terminal morpholine ring, whereas in 39b R1 is shorter and is
terminated by a piperidine ring on an entirely hydrophobic
linker. As a result of the different core orientations, the
directions and interactions with the protein of R1 linkers (i.e.,
what links the sulfur atom and the tertiary amine of the
thioether side chain) are somewhat different for 2i and 39b.
While in 39b the R1 linker is directed to sterically contact the
backbone of Phe27-Asp26, the R1 of 2i is directed along the
other side of the binding cleft, in steric contact with the
D
ACS Chem. Biol. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX