Angewandte
Communications
Chemie
erated from the cyclization of enynones (1; see Table 1), thus
giving rise to a range of enantioenriched dihydroindoles and
dihydrobenzofurans.
phthalimide-based catalysts proved to be better choices for
the reaction, thus resulting in the desired 2a in quantitative
yield and with enantioselectivities within the 38–94% range
(entries 5–9). For example, the enantioselectivity reached to
70% when [Rh2(S-PTTL)4] was applied as the catalyst
(entry 5). The use of a bulkier dirhodium catalyst, [Rh2(S-
BPTTL)4], further increased the enantioselectivity to 85%
(entry 6). Electron-deficient dirhodium catalysts, [Rh2(S-
TCPTTL)4] and [Rh2(S-TFPTTL)4], gave 38 and 75% ee,
respectively (entries 7and 8). [Rh2(S-PTAD)4] gave the high-
est enantioselectivity of 94% ee (entry 9). N-naphthaloylteth-
ered chiral dirhodium tetracarboxylates such as [Rh2(S-
NTTL)4] performed good activity but with only moderate
enantioselectivity (entry 10). In the tested solvents, DCE
proved to be the optimal one (entries 11–13). Lowering the
reaction temperature to À208C further improved the enan-
tioselectivity to 97% ee (entry 14).
À
We optimized the C H insertion reaction conditions by
using the enynone 1a, tethered to a N-benzylacetamide, as
a standard substrate (Table 1). The desired dihydroindole 2a
could be obtained in quantitative yield and with larger than
99:1 diastereoselectivity when the reaction was conducted at
Table 1: Optimization of the reaction conditions.[a]
Entry
RhII
Solvent
Yield [%][b]
ee [%][c]
Based on the optimized reaction conditions (Table 1,
entry 14), the substrate scope of the asymmetric intramolec-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14[e]
[Rh2(OPiv)4]
DCE
DCE
DCE
DCE
DCE
DCE
DCE
DCE
DCE
DCE
DCM
toluene
hexane
DCE
99
99
8[d]
21[d]
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
90
99
–
22
À66
4
À
ular C H insertion was then examined. It was shown that the
[Rh2(S-DOSP)4]
[Rh2(S-BTPCP)4]
Rh2(5S-MEPY)4]
[Rh2(S-PTTL)4]
[Rh2(S-BPTTL)4]
[Rh2(S-TCPTTL)4]
[Rh2(S-TFPTTL)4]
[Rh2(S-PTAD)4]
[Rh2(S-NTTL)4]
[Rh2(S-PTAD)4]
[Rh2(S-PTAD)4]
[Rh2(S-PTAD)4]
[Rh2(S-PTAD)4]
catalytic process could be successfully applied to different
enynone substrates bearing N-alkylacetamide side chains
(Table 2). For example, in addition to 1a, various enynone
derivatives (1) containing N-arylmethylacetamides could be
effectively converted into the desired dihydroindoles 2 with
excellent enantioselectivities (91–99% ee; 2a–l). The yields
were typically higher than 90% for most substrates. The
substrates with electron-rich aryl groups have higher reac-
tivity, thus furnishing the dihydroindole products 2a–e in
70
85
38
75
94
56
88
73
80
97
À
almost quantitative yields. This C H insertion reaction could
be easily scaled up to gram scale without the loss of the yield
and enantioselectivity by using only 0.1 mol% catalyst, which
afforded the product 2 f in 96% yield and 99% ee. The
functional groups MeO, NO2, CN, and ester were all well-
tolerated (2e, 2j, 2k, 2l). Furthermore, the enynone with
N-alkylacetamide also served as a substrate, thus affording
the desired product 2m in good yield, but both the diastereo-
and enantioselectivity fell significantly (1:1 d.r., 71% ee).
Moreover, enynones with different substituents on the
carbonyl groups were also suitable substrates for this trans-
formation, and led to the dihydroindoles 2n and 2o in 94 and
80% ee, respectively.
[a] Reaction conditions: [Rh2L4]/1a=0.002: 0.2 (mmol) in 2 mL of
solvent at 258C. [b] Yield of isolated product. [c] The ee value of 2a was
determined by HPLC using a chiral stationary phase. [d] Determined by
1H NMR spectroscopy. [e] À208C, 36 h. DCE=1,2-dichloroethane.
In addition to the enynones with an N-alkylacetamide
À
substituent, we also investigated the C H insertion of
enynones having an ether side chain, thus producing the
corresponding chiral dihydrobenzofuran or tetrahydrofuran
(Table 3). Like the N-alkylacetamide enynones 1, the ether
À
counterparts also underwent the C H insertion reaction
smoothly, thus producing the corresponding products in good
yields (65–99%), whereas the ether counterparts were more
sensitive to the electronic and steric factors of R3. For
example, the enynones 1 tethered to an electron-deficient
benzylic ether functioned better than an electron-rich one
(2aa–ae). While enynones with bulkier benzylic ether moi-
room temperature with 1 mol% [Rh2(OPiv)4] in a one-pot
manner (Table 1, entry 1). Dirhodium N-sulfonylprolinates
such as [Rh2(S-DOSP)4] resulted in high yield, but with only
22% ee (entry 2). Dirhodium triarylcyclopropane carboxylate
catalysts such as [Rh2(S-BTPCP)4] led to higher enantiose-
lectivity (À66% ee), but much lower reactivity (entry 3). The
result using the rhodium(II) carboxamide catalyst [Rh2(5S-
MEPY)4] was discouraging (entry 4). To our delight, the
eties
exhibited higher enantioselectivity
(2af–ak).
Pentafluorobenzylic ether, which is an extremely electron-
deficient substrate, showed excellent stereo- and enantiose-
lectivity but with somewhat lower reactivity (2aj). In addition
to benzylic ethers, an allylic ether, aliphatic ether, and even
2
ꢀ 2016 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 1 – 6
These are not the final page numbers!