4068
J. Liu et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 13 (2003) 4065–4069
from the right carotid artery to the left jugular vein via
the polyethylene tube for 15 min. The thread was taken
out and weighed and the weight of the wet thrombus
was recorded. The thread was kept in a desiccator for 2
weeks and the weight of the dry thrombus was recorded.
The data are listed in Table 4. The statistical analysis of
the date is also carried out by use of ANOVA test,
p<0.05 is considered significant.
treatment potency for 13, 14 or 15 was again sub-
stantially same as that for RGDS, RGDV or RGDF
(Table 4). The results demonstrated that when 3 was
introduced into the N-terminal of RGDS, RGDV or
RGDF the formed linker as the the ligand may be still
suitable for its binding to GP IIb/IIIa receptor and the
anti-thrombolitic activity of RGDS, RGDV or RGDF
was consequently remained.
Scavenging NO is an important strategy in the preven-
tion of ischemic brain injury. The combination of
nitronyl nitroxide and RGD peptide provides a possi-
bility to scavenge NO and prevent thrombus formation
simultaneously. On the other hand the label of RGD
peptides with nitronyl nitroxide may provide new path
for further biological investigation as well.
Discussion
As the NO scavenging agent block 3 can be smoothly
introduced into the N-terminal of RGDS, RGDV and
RGDF. In the ESR measurements 3, 13–15 give the
same spectroscopy means that as the NO scavenging
block 3 was stable enough to the deprotection of the
protective groups on the side chain of the amino acid
residue in 3 containing peptides with CF3SO3H/TFA
(1:4, v/v) or anhydrous HF as the deprotection system.
The special stability of 3 to the conditions of peptide
synthesis indicates that as peptide spin label block 3
may have potential use.
Acknowledgements
The author Shiqi Peng thanks the National Natural
Science Foundation (20232020) and Key Research
Project(G 1998051111) of China for financial support.
Even though RGDS, RGDV and RGDF exhibited no
any NO scavenging activity the inhibition percentage of
Ach-induced vasorelaxation for 3, 13, 14, and 15 was
99.2ꢃ1.4, 88.9ꢃ1.2, 91.2ꢃ0.5, and 88.9ꢃ5.3, respec-
tively, which was significantly different from that
(1.6ꢃ1.4) for water (Table 1). The approximate equal
ability of NO scavenging for 3, 13, 14, and 15 demon-
strated that when RGDS, RGDV or RGDF was intro-
duced into 3 the formed linker as the substrate may be
still suitable for NO scavenging reaction and NO
scavenging activity of 3 was consequently remained.
References and Notes
1. Iadecola, C. TINS 1997, 20, 132.
2. Zhang, F.; Iodecola, C. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1994,
14, 574.
3. Hobbs, A. J.; Higgs, A.; Moncada, S. Ann. Rev. Pharmacol.
Toxicol. 1999, 39, 191.
4. Weinkam, R. J.; Jorgensen, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1971, 93,
7033.
At the concentrations of 10ꢀ7, 10ꢀ6, and 10ꢀ5 mol/L 3
exhibited no any effect on ADP and PAF induced
platelet aggregation but at the concentration of 10ꢀ6
and 10ꢀ5 mol/L 13, 14 and 15 obviously inhibited pla-
telet aggregation. When ADP activated platelets were
treated with 10ꢀ6 mol/L, and 10ꢀ5 mol/L of 13, 14 or 15
the platelet aggregation rate (%) was lowered from
55.97ꢃ5.01 (for NS, control) to 40.05ꢃ3.21,
24.99ꢃ2.54, 20.66ꢃ2.96, and 16.91ꢃ2.55, 11.85ꢃ1.65,
10.21ꢃ1.95, respectively. The treatment potency for 13,
14 or 15 was substantially same as that for RGDS,
RGDV or RGDF (Table 2). Approximately same
effects of 13, 14, 15, RGDS, RGDV or RGDF on PAF
induced platelet aggregation was also observed (Table
3). The results indicated that when 3 was introduced
into the N-terminal of RGDS, RGDV or RGDF the
formed linker as the ligand may be still suitable for its
binding to GP IIb/IIIa receptor and the anti-platelet
aggregation activity of RGDS, RGDV or RGDF was
consequently remained.
5. Swartz, H. M. Pure Appl. Chem. 1990, 62, 235.
6. Maeda, H.; Akaike, T.; Yoshida, M.; Suga, M. J. Leukicyte
Biology 1994, 56, 588.
7. Gralnick, H. R.; Coller, S. B. Blood 1984, 64, 797.
8. Timmons, S.; Hawiger, J. Trans. Assoc. Am. Phys. 1986, 99,
226.
9. Strony, J. T.; Folts, J. D.; Adelman, B. Clin. Res. 1989, 54,
117.
10. Rapoport, R. M. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1985, 115, 219.
11. Zhao, M.; Peng, S. Q. J. Prakt. Chem. 1999, 341, 668.
12. Zhao, M.; Wang, C.; Yang, J.; Peng, S. Q. Prep. Biochem.
Biotechnol. 2000, 30, 247.
13. Lin, N.; Zhao, M.; Wang, C.; Peng, S. Q. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 2002, 12, 585.
14. Ullman, F. E.; Osiecki, J. H.; Boocock, D. G. B.; Darcy,
R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 7049.
15. Wu, Y.F.; Zhao, M.; Wang, C.; Peng, S.Q. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 2002, 12, 2331. The physical data: 1-(10,30-dioxyl-
40,40,50,50 -tetramethyldihydroimidazol-20 -yl)-phenyl-4-yloxyl-
acetic acid (3), Mp 155–157 ꢂC, EI–MS (m/e): 307 [M]+; Boc-
Arg(Tos)-Gly-Asp(OcHex)-Ser(Bzl)-OBzl (4), Mp 73–75 ꢂC,
[a]2D0=ꢀ34 (c 0.4, CHCl3), FAB-MS (m/e): 950 [M+H]+;
BocArg-(Tos)-Gly-Asp(OcHex)-Val-OBzl (5), Mp 79–81 ꢂC
[a]2D0=ꢀ24 (c 0.4, CHCl3), FAB-MS (m/e): 872 [M+H]+;
Boc-Arg(Tos)-Gly-Asp(OcHex)-Phe-OBzl (6), mp 165–170 ꢂC,
[a]2D0=ꢀ25 (c 0.4, CHCl3), FAB-MS (m/e): 920 [M+H]+;
RGDS, mp 110–111 ꢂC, [a]2D0=ꢀ20 (c 0.2, 6 N HCl), FAB-MS
(m/e): 434 [M+H]+; RGDV, mp 120–121 ꢂC, [a]2D0=ꢀ20 (c 0.3,
6 N HCl), FAB-MS (m/e): 446 [M+H]+; RGDF, mp 125–
The anti-thrombolitic in vivo of 3 and 13–15 indicated
that 3 exhibited no any effect on the thrombus weight
butatthe dose of 5 mmol/kg 13, 14, or 15 did exhibited
anti-thrombolitic effect. The thrombus weight after the
treatment with 13, 14, or 15 was 32.09ꢃ3.42,
29.49ꢃ3.30, and 24.30ꢃ2.43 mg, respectively. The