as well as asymmetric catalytic hydrogenation of furyl
ketone.2f Despite the high yield and high enantioselectivity,
all the synthesized furyl alcohols possess only C-2 substit-
uents. 2,3-Disubstituted furyl alcohols, on the other hand,
have attracted less attention.
PDC in CH2Cl2 furnished furyl aldehydes 7 without destroy-
ing the chiral boronate moiety.
From the X-ray crystallographic analysis of 7a (Figure
2a) and 7b (Figure 2b), it is evident that, compared to the
Boronic esters of (S)-pinanediol (2)3 and (2R,3R)-1,4-
dimethoxy-1,1,4,4-tetraphenyl-2,3-butanediol (3)4 (Figure 1)
have been used as efficient chiral auxiliaries in asymmetric
synthesis. Moreover, the diastereoselective aldol reactions
of chiral 3-(p-tolylsulfinyl)furfural with silyl ketene were also
reported recently.5 In connection with our interest in the
realization of highly functionalized pyranone 1, we wish to
report our employment of boronic esters as chiral auxiliaries
for the synthesis of optically pure 2,3-disubstituted furyl
alcohols.
Employing our own experience on the regiospecific
synthesis of substituted furans,6 pyrroles,7 and thiophenes,8
furyl aldehydes 7 were designed as our initial target
molecules, which in turn were synthesized from com-
mercially available 3-bromofuran (4) via the regiospecific
route as shown in Scheme 1.
Figure 2. (a) X-ray crystal structure of 7a; (b) X-ray crystal
structure of 7b with a predicted more favorable Re-face nucleophilic
attack.
diol 2 as chiral auxiliary, the bulky diol 3 with C2 symmetry
more effectively occupies the space around the carbonyl
group on the furan ring. As the Si-face of the carbonyl group
was blocked by a bulky substituent, the less hindered Re-
face attack of nucleophiles to the carbonyl group was
expected, leading possibly to high diastereoselectivity. An
AM1 calculation also confirms this conformation.11 More-
over, the huge geometric differentiation between the resulting
diastereomers should also allow for a successful separation
of both diastereomers by flash column chromatography.
We first investigated the addition reactions of furyl
aldehyde 7a (entry 1, Table 1). The addition reaction of 7a
with n-BuLi furnished 8a and 9a, which are not separable
on column chromatography, in moderate yield and low
diastereoselectivity. The newly created chiral centers of the
diastereomers were confirmed by their conversions to the
corresponding Mosher ester.12 This unsatisfactory outcome
may be attributed to the less pronounced stereochemical
environment of the chiral auxiliary around the carbonyl
group. We then turned our focus to the addition reactions of
7b. Thus, addition reactions of 7b with various nucleophiles
afforded diastereomers 8b-h and 9b-h in good yields and
moderate diastereoselectivities (entries 2-8, Table 1). As
expected, these diastereomers can be efficiently separated
by flash column chromatography leading to pure diastere-
omers. Further increasing the nucleophile’s bulkiness allows
an easier separation of both diastereomers (entries 5-8, Table
1). The newly created chiral centers were also confirmed by
conversion to the corresponding Mosher ester, by Riguera’s
method,13 and by X-ray crystallographic analysis.14
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Furyl Aldehydes 7
Regiospecific depotonation9 of 4 with LDA at -78 °C in
THF gave R-lithiated furan, which was further quenched by
gaseous formaldehyde to furnish furyl alcohol 5. Transfor-
mation of the C-Br bond of 5 to the C-B bond of 6 was
successful after a series of reactions, including metalation
with 2 equiv of n-BuLi, boronation with triisopropyl borate,
hydrolysis of borate salt, and dehydration of furyl boronic
acid with the corresponding diols. Mild oxidation10 of 6 with
(2) (a) Haukaas, M. H.; O’Doherty, G. A. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 401. (b)
Kusakabe, M.; Kitano, Y.; Kobayashi, Y.; Sato, F. J. Org. Chem. 1989,
54, 2085. (c) Kita, Y.; Naka, T.; Imanishi, M.; Akai, S.; Takebe, Y.; Matsugi,
M. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1998, 1183. (d) Keck, G. E.; Yu, T.
Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 289. (e) Ohkuma, T.; Koizumi, M.; Yoshida, M.; Noyori,
R. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 1749. (f) Burk, M. J.; Hems, W.; Herzberg, D.; Malan,
C.; Zanotti-Gerosa, A. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 4173.
(3) For a review, see: Matteson, D. S. Chem. ReV. 1989, 89, 1535.
(4) (a) Nakayama, K.; Rainier, J. D. Tetrahedron 1990, 46, 4165. (b)
Luithle, J. E. A.; Pietruszka, J. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 8287. (c) Luithle,
J. E. A.; Pietruszka, J. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 9194.
(5) Arai, Y.; Masuda, T.; Masaki, Y. Synlett 1997, 1459.
(6) Wong, M. K.; Leung, C. Y.; Wong, H. N. C. Tetrahedron 1997, 53,
3497.
(7) Liu, J.-H.; Yang, Q.-C.; Mak, T. C. W.; Wong, H. N. C. J. Org.
Chem. 2000, 65, 3587.
(11) Courtesy of Prof. Yundong Wu, The Hong Kong University of
Science and Technology.
(12) Trost, B. M.; Belletire, J. L.; Godleski, S.; McDougal, P. G.;
Balkovec, J. M. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 2370.
(13) (a) Latypov, Sh. K.; Seco, J. M.; Quin˜oa´, E.; Riguera, R. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 877. (b) Latypov, Sh. K.; Seco, J. M.; Quin˜oa´, E.;
Riguera, R. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 8569. (c) Latypov, Sh. K.; Seco, J.
M.; Quin˜oa´, E.; Riguera, R. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 1538.
(8) Ye, X.-S.; Wong, H. N. C. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 1940.
(9) Ly, N. D.; Schlosser, M. HelV. Chim. Acta 1977, 60, 2085.
(10) Matteson, D. S. In Stereodirected Synthesis with Organo-boranes;
Hafner, K., Rees, C. W., Trost, B. M., Lehn, J.-M., von Rague´ Schleyer,
P., Eds.; Springer-Verlag: Heidelberg, 1995; p 107.
3992
Org. Lett., Vol. 3, No. 25, 2001