1560
M. Mastihubová et al.
LETTER
(17) In a typical procedure, Lipase PS (5 g) was added to a
Table Comparison of Chemical and Enzymatic Conditions Used
for Deacetylation of 3a–d
solution of 3a–d (0.003 mol) in CH2Cl2 (50 mL) and 2-
propanol (25 mL). Both solvents were pre-dried over
molecular sieves, 3 Å. The reaction mixture was stirred or
shaken at 250 rpm until complete disappearance of the
starting material, generally for about 3 days at 40 °C. The
reaction was terminated by removal of the enzyme by
filtration. The filter cake was washed with CH2Cl2 (CHCl3
for 4a) and the filtrate concentrated by evaporation of the
solvents at reduced pressure. The crude product was purified
by crystallization from CH2Cl2–cyclohexane and the
enzyme filter cake could be air-dried and reused for at least
five additional reaction cycles.
Substrate
R
Product Pyrrolidine Lipase
Yield (%) Yield (%)b
3a
4a
0a
91
NO2
O
O
3b
4b
0a
84
CH3
The isolation and purification of 4-methylumbelliferyl
ferulate (4b) was more complicated due to its insolubility.
Thus, Lipase PS was washed with DMSO, followed by
addition of water to the filtrate, and the precipitated 4b was
filtered and crystallized from 2-methoxyethanol–CHCl3.
4a: 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): 3.84 (s, 3H, OCH3),
6.75 (d, 1 H, JAB = 15.8 Hz, H-A), 6.84 (d, 1 H, J5,6 = 8.2 Hz,
H-5), 7.23 (dd, 1 H, J2,6 = 2.0 Hz, H-6), 7.44 (d, 1 H, H-2),
7.51 (dt, 2 H, H-2',6'), 7.82 (d, 1 H, H-B), 8.32 (dt, 2 H, H-
3', 5'); 13C NMR (100.6 MHz, DMSO-d6): 55.73 (OCH3),
111.56 (C-2), 112.55 (C-A), 115.57 (C-5), 123.17 (C-2', 6'),
124.00 (C-6), 125.24 (C-3', 5'), 125.29 (C-1), 144.84 (C-4'),
148.01 (C-3), 148.15 (C-B), 150.10 (C-4), 155.62 (C-1'),
164.60 (COO). 4b: 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): 2.46
(s, 3H, CH3), 3.84 (s, 3 H, OCH3), 6.40 (s, 1 H, H-3'), 6.74
(d, 1 H, JAB = 15.9 Hz, H-A), 6.84 (d, 1 H, J5,6 = 8.1 Hz, H-
3c
4c
77b,c
84b
90
89
3d
-CH2-CF3
4d
a No ester was found in the reaction mixture according to TLC, only
products of complete hydrolysis.
b Yield of isolated pure product.
c Ferulic acid and R-OH observed on TLC besides the desired ester.
References and Notes
(1) Faulds, C. B.; Kroon, P. A.; Bartolomè, B.; Williamson, G.
Carbohydrate Biotechnology Protocols, In Methods in
Biotechnology, Vol. 10; Bucke, C., Ed.; Humana Press Inc.:
Totowa NJ, 1998, 183–195.
(2) Okamura, S.; Watanabe, M. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1982, 46,
297.
(3) Kroon, P. A.; Williamson, G. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem.
1996, 23, 263.
(4) Faulds, C. B.; Bartolomè, B.; Williamson, G. Ind. Crops.
Prod. 1997, 6, 367.
5), 7.23 (dd, 1 H, J2,6 = 1.9 Hz, H-6), 7.26 (dd, 1 H, J5’,6’
=
8.2 Hz, J6’,8’ = 2.0 Hz, H-6’), 7.35 (d, 1 H, H-8’), 7.44 (d, 1
H, H-2), 7.80 (d, 1 H, H-B), 7.84 (d, 1 H, H-5’); 13C NMR
(75.5 MHz, DMSO-d6): 18.13 (CH3), 55.71 (OCH3),
110.08 (C-8’), 111.52 (C-2), 112.80 (C-A), 113.62 (C-3’),
115.56 (C-5), 117.38 (C-10’), 118.45 (C-6’), 123.83 (C-6),
125.32 (C-1), 126.36 (C-5’), 147.78 (C-B), 147.98 (C-3),
149.97 (C-4), 152.99 (C-4’+C-9’), 153.54 (C-7’), 159.66 (C-
2’), 164.84 (COO). 4c: 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): 3.95
(s, 3 H, OCH3), 5.94 (s, 1 H, OH), 6.65 (d, 1 H, JAB = 15.9
Hz, H-A), 6.97 (d, 1 H, J5,6 = 8.2 Hz, H-5), 7.13 (d, 1 H, J2,6
= 1.9 Hz, H-2), 7.18 (dd, 1 H, H-6), 7.32 (dd, 1 H, J2’,3’ = 7.5
Hz, J2’,4’ = 0.9 Hz, H-2’), 7.46 - 7.53 (m, 3 H, H-6’+H-7’+H-
3’), 7.76 (d, 1 H, J3’, 4’ = 8.3 Hz, H-4’), 7.86 - 7.95 (m, 2 H,
H-5’+H-8’), 7.92 (d, 1 H, H-B); 13C NMR (75.5 MHz,
CDCl3): 55.98 (OCH3), 109.57 (C-2), 114.27 (C-A),
114.85 (C-5), 118.15 (C-2’), 121.35 (C-8’), 123.54 (C-6),
125.45 (C-3’), 125.89 (C-4’), 126.39 (C-6’+C-7’), 126.76 (C-
1), 127.00 (C-9’), 128.01 (C-5’), 134.67 (C-10’), 146.86 (C-
1’+C-3), 147.05 (C-B), 148.44 (C-4), 165.75 (COO). 4d: 1H
NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): 3.92 (s, 3 H, OCH3), 4.57 (q, 2
H, CH2), 5.95 (s, 1 H, OH), 6.32 (d, 1 H, JAB = 15.9 Hz, H-
A), 6.92 (d, 1 H, J5,6 = 8.2 Hz, H-5), 7.03 (d, 1 H, J2,6 = 2.0
Hz, H-2), 7.09 (dd, 1 H, H-6), 7.70 (d, 1 H, H-B); 13C NMR
(100.6 MHz, CDCl3): 55.94 (OCH3), 60.28 (q, CH2, 2JC-C-
F = 37.0 Hz), 109.42 (C-2), 113.09 (C-A), 114.79 (C-5),
123.15 (q, CF3, 1JC-F = 276.9 Hz), 123.62 (C-6), 126.44 (C-
1), 146.80 (C-3), 146.23 (C-B), 148.51 (C-4), 165.46
(COO).
(5) Hatfield, R. D.; Helm, R. F.; Ralph, J. Anal. Biochem. 1991,
194, 25.
(6) Lu, F.; Ralph, J. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1998, 46, 2911.
(7) Green, T. W.; Wuts, P. G. M. Protective Groups in Organic
Synthesis, 3rd Ed.; Wiley: New York, 1999, 277–278.
(8) Månsson, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982, 23, 1845.
(9) Basavaiah, D.; Bhaskar Raju, S. Synth. Commun. 1994, 24,
467.
(10) Reidel, A.; Waldmann, H. J. Prakt. Chem. 1993, 335, 109.
(11) Especially, 4-nitrophenyl benzoates hydrolyze in mildly
alkaline buffers, see: Cevasco, G.; Guanti, G.; Thea, S.;
Williams, A. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1984, 783.
(12) Milder modification of deacetylated conditions from
literature.6,8
(13) When 10 equivalents of pyrrolidine were added at once, 4d
was partially hydrolyzed too.
(14) Lipase PS from Amano Pharmaceutical (LPSAX04509).
(15) Sugiura, M.; Oikawa, T.; Hirano, K.; Inukai, T. Biochim.
Biophys. Acta 1977, 488, 353.
(16) Secundo, F.; Ottolina, G.; Riva, S.; Carrea, G. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 1997, 8, 2167.
Synlett 2001, No. 10, 1559–1560 ISSN 0936-5214 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York