A. V. Velentza et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 13 (2003) 3465–3470
3469
3. Schumacher, A. M.; Velentza, A. V.; Watterson, D. M.
Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 2002, 6, 497.
were calculated for each animal both directly and using the
À
Á
CꢀI
formula: 100ꢃ
¼ %Damage where I represents the weight
C
4. Wermuth, C.-G. J. Heterocyclic Chem. 1998, 35, 1091.
5. Carr, R.; Jhoti, H. Drug Discov. Today 2002, 7, 522.
6. Watterson, D. M.; Mirzoeva, S.; Guo, L.; Whyte, A.;
Bourguignon, J.-J.; Hibert, M.; Haiech, J.; Van Eldik, L. J.
Neurochem. Intl. 2001, 39, 459.
7. Mirzoeva, S.; Sawkar, A.; Zasadzki, M.; Guo, L.; Velentza,
A. V.; Dunlap, V.; Bourguignon, J. J.; Ramstrom, H.; Haiech,
J.; Van Eldik, L. J.; Watterson, D. M. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45,
563.
8. Velentza, A. V.; Schumacher, A. M.; Weiss, C.; Egli, M.;
Watterson, D. M. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 38956.
9. Velentza, A. V.; Schumacher, M.; Watterson, D. M. Phar-
macol. Ther. 2002, 93, 217.
of the ipsilateral and C the weight of the contralateral hemi-
sphere. All data are expressed as meanꢂSEM. The degree of
HI induced brain injury in each treatment group was expres-
sed as the percentage of reduction in the tissue weight of the
hemisphere ipsilateral to carotid ligation. This was calculated
as a ratio of the right (ipsilateral, ischemic) to the left (con-
tralateral, non-ischemic) hemispheric weights. The percent
reduction in hemispheric weights was compared by one-way
analysis of variance (StatView 5.0, SAS, Cary, NC, USA). The
Mann–Whitney test was used to determine significance for
nonparametric data. Statistical significance was assumed when
p<0.05. In the first set of experiments where animals were
treated prior to HI induced injury, the weight of the ischemic
hemisphere in the vehicle-treated animals was 0.2878ꢂ0.0242
g. The weight of the ischemic hemisphere in the animals trea-
ted with compound 4 (minaprine) was 0.3181ꢂ0.0328 g. The
weight of the ischemic hemisphere in the animals treated with
compound 1 was 0.3869ꢂ0.0165 g. There was no significant
difference in the weight of the non-ischemic (left) hemisphere
10. The extent of reactions was monitored by analytical
HPLC and final compounds were purified by RP-HPLC
chromatography on a preparative Microsorb (Rainin Instru-
ments; Woburn, MA, USA) C18 column using gradients of
0.1% (v/v) TFA in water and 80% aqueous acetonitrile con-
taining 0.08% TFA. Mass spectrometry was done using a Per-
1
Septives (Foster City, CA, USA) Voyager DE-Pro system. H
NMR spectrum for compound 1 was obtained on an INOVA
500 (1H, 20–500 MHz tunable) spectrometer in CD3OD.
between vehicle-treated (0.4168ꢂ0.1248 g), compound
4
(minaprine)-treated (0.4462ꢂ0.0172 g) and compound 1-trea-
ted (0.4672ꢂ0.0083 gm) animals. In the second experiment
where treatments were done 6 h after HI injury, the weight of
ischemic hemisphere in the vehicle-treated animals
(0.2484ꢂ0.0103 g) was significantly different from the com-
pound 3-treated animals (0.3191ꢂ0.0228 g).
11. Synthesis and characterization of compounds: For the
synthesis of compound 1, 11-(3-imino-5,6-dihydro-3H-ben-
zo[h]cinnolin-2-yl)-undecanoic acid (0.88 g, 2.3 mmol) reacted
with 3-amino-6-phenyl-pyridazine (0.4 g, 2.3mmol) in 2 mL
DMF. HOBt (0.35 g, 2.3 mmol) and EDC (0.44 g, 2.3 mmol)
were used. 11-(3-imino-5,6-dihydro-3H-benzo[h]cinnolin-2-yl)-
undecanoic acid-(6-phenyl-pyridazin-3-yl)-amide was prepared
as a light yellow solid. The mass (m/z) of 534.9 was that
expected for the product (calcd for C33H38N6O 534.3). NMR
18. Karasawa, Y.; Araki, H.; Otomo, S. Physiol. Behavior
1992, 52, 141.
19. Lipinski, C. A.; Lombardo, F.; Dominy, B. W.; Feeney,
P . J.Adv. Drug. Deliv. Rev. 2001, 46, 3.
20. Tereshko, V.; Teplova, M.; Brunzelle, J.; Watterson,
D. M.; Egli, M. Nature Struct. Biol. 2001, 8, 899.
1
analysis was consistent with the expected product. H NMR
(CD3OD): d 1.262–1.4 (t, 16), 1.675–1.690 (t, 2), 1.916–1.929
(t, 2), 2.461–2.490 (t, 2), 2.974–3.030 (m, 4), 4.307–4.336 (t, 2),
5.468 (s, 4), 7.285–7.524 (m, 4), 7.971–8.087 (m, 1), 8.484–
8.502 (m, 2). For the synthesis of compound 2, 11-(6-imino-3-
phenyl-6H-pyridazin-1-yl)-undecanoic acid (0.88 g, 2.3 mmol)
reacted with 3-amino-6-phenyl-pyridazine (0.4 g, 2.3 mmol)
exactly as described for compound 1. The mass (m/z) of 509.1
was that expected for the product (calcd for C31H36N6O
508.3). For the synthesis of compound 3, 11-(6-imino-3-
methyl-6H-pyridazin-1-yl)-undecanoic acid (0.1 g, 0.35 mmol)
reacted with 3-amino-6-phenyl-pyridazine (0.06 g, 0.35 mmol)
exactly as described for compound 1. The mass (m/z) of 447.4
was that expected for the product (calcd for C26H34N6O
446.3).
21. Crystals were grown at 20 ꢁC by mixing the protein and
aminopyridazine solutions (6 mg mLꢀ1 protein, 30 mM 5,6-
dihydro-benzo[h]cinnolin-3-ylamine) with an equal volume of
1.1 M ammonium sulfate, 100 mM Hepes pH 7.5. The crystals
were transferred to a non-polar stabilization buffer of 20%
PEG 8000, 100 mM Hepes pH 7.5, containing 15 mM of the
5,6-dihydro-benzo[h]cinnolin-3-ylamine to ensure the binding
of the low affinity fragment. The crystals were cryoprotected
with 20% glycerol in the stabilization buffer and flash-cooled
in liquid nitrogen. Diffraction data were measured at the
DuPont-Northwestern-Dow Collaborative Access Team
(DND-CAT) beamline 5-ID-B, at the Advanced Photon
Source (APS), Argonne, IL, USA and processed with the HKL
suite of programs.22,23 The initial model, 1JKL20 with waters
and ligands removed, was positioned by rigid body refinement
using CNS.24 Model building was done using O.25 Further
refinement included simulated annealing, positional minimiza-
tion and temperature factor protocols using CNS, employing
the bulk solvent correction.22 The structure has been deposited
in the Protein Data Bank and the PDB ID code is 1P4F.
22. Data collection and refinement statistics for the crystal
structure of the complex of DAPK catalytic domain with 5,6-
Dihydro-benzo[h]cinnolin-3-ylamine: Space group P212121,
unit cell a=47.24 b=62.53 c=88.93 A, resolution range 30–
1.9 A (highest bin 1.97–1.90 A), completeness 97.9% (97.3%),
12. Contreras, J. M.; Parrot, I.; Sippl, W.; Rival, Y. M.;
Wermuth, C. G. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 2707.
13. Worms, P.; Chambon, J. P.; Wermuth, C. G. Actual.
´
Chim. Ther. 1989, 16, 303.
14. Mirzoeva, S.; Koppal, T.; Petrova, T. V.; Lukas, T. J.;
Watterson, D. M.; Van Eldik, L. J. Brain Res. 1999, 844, 126.
15. Capdeville, R.; Buchdunger, E.; Zimmermann, J.; Matter,
A. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2002, 1, 493.
16. Schumacher, A. M.; Velentza, A. V.; Watterson, D. M.;
Wainwright, M. S. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2002, 1600, 128.
17. Quantification of brain injury: All experiments were per-
formed in accordance with the relevant National Institutes of
Health guidelines, and protocols were approved by the Insti-
tutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Northwestern
University, Chicago. The comparison of disparities in hemi-
spheric weight as a valid outcome measure of neurologic
injury in the newborn rat has been demonstrated in studies26
correlating changes in hemispheric weight following hypoxia-
ischemia with other measures of brain injury. Animals were
sacrificed seven days after injury and differences in weight
between the HI injured and control contralateral hemisphere
R
merge=0.049 (0.213), Average I/s(I)=25.8 (5.5). The final
model contains 2275 protein, 193 water, and 15 aminopyr-
idazine fragment atoms, has an Rcryst of 20.7% and Rfree of
25.6%, and mean temperature factors of 20.8 A2 for protein
atoms, 26.6 A2 for waters and 23.1 A2 for aminopyridazine
atoms.
23. Otwinowski, Z.; Minor, W. Methods Enzymol. 1997, 276,
307.
24. Brunger, A. T. Crystallography & NMR System (CNS),
¨
Version 0.9; Yale University: New Haven, 1998.