Journal of Natural Products
Article
3H), 1.48 (s, 6H); 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3) δ 175.7, 157.2,
153.8, 153.0, 144.8, 136.4, 131.8, 131.2, 130.1, 128.6, 128.2, 127.6,
122.1, 115.7, 107.8, 104.9, 103.6, 77.9, 28.3, 25.8, 21.5, 18.1;
HREIMS m/z found 404.1625 (calcd for C25H24O5 [M]+ 404.1624).
Synthesis of Flavonol 3 by Electrocyclization. To a solution
of 4 (248.7 mg, 0.69 mmol) in MeOH (5 mL) were added 3,3-
dimethylacrylaldehyde (0.67 mL, 6.90 mmol) and Ca(OH)2 (204.4
mg, 2.76 mmol) at room temperature. After being stirred for 58 h at
the same temperature, the mixture was concentrated in vacuo, diluted
with EtOAc/H2O, and acidified with 5 N HCl. The layers were
separated, washed with H2O and brine, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4,
and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified by column
chromatography (silica gel; hexanes/EtOAc, 20:1) to afford known
36f,g (159.2 mg, 54%).
kidney tissues were homogenized and used in Western blot. Details
on each experimental procedure were described in the Supporting
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
* Supporting Information
■
S
The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the
Experimental procedures and characterization data of
compounds 1, 2, 7, 9−12, and 14; copies of 1H and 13
C
NMR spectra of compounds 1, 2, 7, 9−12, and 14
Synthesis of Aryl Prenyl Ether 14. Phenol 3 (498.5 mg, 1.169
mmol) was dissolved in DMF (20 mL) at room temperature. To this
solution were added sequentially K2CO3 (807.8 mg, 5.845 mmol) and
prenyl chloride (0.395 mL, 3.507 mmol), and the resulting mixture
was stirred for 14 h at 40 °C. The reaction was quenched with
saturated aqueous NH4Cl and diluted with EtOAc. The layers were
separated, and the aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc. The
combined organic layers were washed with brine, dried over
anhydrous Na2SO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was
purified by column chromatography (silica gel; hexanes/EtOAc, 2:1)
to afford aryl prenyl ether 14 (547.9 mg, 95%): 1H NMR (400 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 7.96−7.92 (m, 2H), 7.43−7.37 (m, 3H), 7.32−7.28 (m,
2H), 7.24−7.19 (m, 3H), 6.76 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H), 6.64 (s, 1H), 5.68
(d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 5.67 (dd, J = 7.6, 7.6 Hz, 1H), 5.07(s, 2H), 3.45
(d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 1.78 (s, 3H), 1.71 (s, 3H), 1.46 (s, 6H); 13C
NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 173.4, 157.66, 157.44, 153.84, 153.66,
139.5, 138.3, 136.5, 130.7, 129.99, 129.97, 128.7, 128.3, 127.96,
127.87, 120.1, 113.4, 112.9, 100.3, 77.5, 74.0, 72.2, 28.3, 25.9, 18.2;
HREIMS m/z found 494.2094 (calcd for C32H30O5 [M]+ 494.2093).
Synthesis of 11 by Sigmatropic Rearrangement of Aryl
Prenyl Ether 14. A solution of aryl prenyl ether 14 (547.9 mg, 1.108
mmol) in diethylaniline (100 mL) was stirred at 270 °C for 4 h. The
reaction mixture was concentrated in vacuo and purified by column
chromatography (silica gel; hexanes/EtOAc, 20:1 to 10:1) to afford 11
(481.3 mg, 88%)
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Authors
*Tel: 82-31-400-5805. Fax: 82-31-400-5958. E-mail: onbae@
*Tel: 82-31-219-3448. Fax: 82-31-219-3435. E-mail:
ORCID
■
Author Contributions
§E.-S. Kim and H. Jang contributed equally.
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
■
We thank Professor S. Ruchirawat (Chulabhorn Graduate
Institute) for providing the spectra of sericetin. This work was
supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea
(NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (NRF-
2017R1A2B4004155 and NRF-2017R1C1B3002626).
In Vitro Study in Renal Tubular Cells. In vitro protective
activity and the underlying mechanisms were studied in NRK-52E, rat
renal tubular epithelial cell line, purchased from ATCC (American
Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA). After cells were
treated with cisplatin and/or analyte such as 14 for 24 h, biochemical
assays were conducted to determine the cisplatin-induced cellular
changes. Cell viability was determined using the MTT assay.9
Changes in ROS level or mitochondrial membrane potential were
determined by fluorescent dyes of DCF and JC-1, respectively.17,18
Activation of caspase-3 was determined by Western blotting analysis
of cleaved active caspase-3.9 Details on each experimental procedures
In Vivo Acute Kidney Injury Models in Rats. Protocols for
animal experiments were approved by the Hanyang University
Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC 2016-
0155A). To induce acute kidney injury, cisplatin (6 mg/kg) was
administered to Sprague−Dawley rats (male, body weight 200 10
g) by intraperitoneal injection. Compound 14 was dissolved in 5%
DMSO in 0.9% normal saline and injected once at 24 h before
cisplatin administration and once a day for five consecutive days after
cisplatin treatment. The rats were divided into four groups and treated
as follows: vehicle control group treated with 1% DMSO in saline,
cisplatin alone with single administration of cisplatin (6 mg/kg) in
saline, 14 + cisplatin group treated with cisplatin (6 mg/kg) and 1
mg/kg 14, and 14 alone treated with 1 mg/kg 14. Rats were sacrificed
at day 7 after cisplatin treatment. To analyze renal function and/or
tissue damage, blood and kidney tissue samples were collected from
each rat. The levels of BUN and serum creatinine in serum samples
were determined by clinical chemistry analysis in Neodin VetLab
(Seoul, Korea). Histologic observations were performed with isolated
kidney samples. To detect caspase-3 activation in vivo, isolated rat
REFERENCES
■
(1) (a) Peralta, M. A.; Ortega, M. G.; Cabrera, J. L.; Paraje, M. G.
Food Chem. Toxicol. 2018, 114, 285−291. (b) Tao, Z.; Liu, J.; Jiang,
Y.; Gong, L.; Yang, B. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 12445. (c) Sun, Y. J.; Hao, Z.-
Y.; Si, J.-G.; Wang, Yu.; Zhang, Y.-L.; Wang, J.-M.; Gao, M.-L.; Chen,
H. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 82736−82736v For a review, see: . (d) Yang, X.;
Jiang, Y.; Yang, J.; He, J.; Sun, J.; Chen, F.; Zhang, M.; Yang, B. Trends
Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 44, 93−104. (e) Botta, B.; Vitali, A.;
Menendez, P.; Misiti, D.; Delle Monache, G. Curr. Med. Chem. 2005,
12, 713−739.
(2) (a) Mukai, R.; Fujikura, Y.; Murota, K.; Uehara, M.; Minekawa,
S.; Matsui, N.; Kawamura, T.; Nemoto, H.; Terao, J. J. Nutr. 2013,
143, 1558−1564. (b) Chen, Y.; Zhao, Y. H.; Jia, X. B.; Hu, M. Pharm.
Res. 2008, 25, 2190−2199 For a review, see: . (c) Mukai, R. Biosci.,
Biotechnol., Biochem. 2018, 82, 207−215. (d) Terao, J.; Mukai, R.
Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2014, 559, 12−16.
(3) Burrows, B. F.; Ollis, W. D.; Jackman, L. M. Proc. Chem. Soc.
1960, 177−179.
(4) Jain, A. C.; Zutshi, M. K. Tetrahedron 1973, 29, 3347−3350.
(5) Prachyawarakorn, V.; Mahidol, C.; Ruchirawat, S. Eur. J. Org.
Chem. 2011, 2011, 3803−3808.
(6) (a) Park, J.-W.; Choi, W.-G.; Lee, P.-J.; Chung, S.-W.; Kim, B.-S.;
Chung, H.-T.; Cho, S.; Kim, J.-H.; Kang, B.-H.; Kim, H.; Kim, H.-P.;
Back, S.-H. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2017, 38, 1486−1500. (b) Akram,
M.; Shin, I.; Kim, K.-A.; Noh, D.; Baek, S.-H.; Chang, S.-Y.; Kim, H.;
Bae, O.-N. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2016, 307, 62−71. (c) Akram,
M.; Kim, K.-A.; Kim, E.-S.; Shin, Y.-J.; Noh, D.; Kim, E.; Kim, J.-H.;
Majid, A.; Chang, S.-Y.; Kim, J. K.; Bae, O.-N. Chem.-Biol. Interact.
2016, 256, 102−110. (d) Song, J.-H.; Kwon, B.-E.; Jang, H.; Kang, H.;
Cho, S.; Park, K.; Ko, H.-J.; Kim, H. Biomol. Ther. 2015, 23, 465−470.
F
J. Nat. Prod. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX