550
LETTERS
SYNLETT
(Scheme 2). Evidence for the direct participation and the influence of
the silyl moiety on the dimerisation of the ketyl radicals can be seen in
the observation, that with the very bulky TBDPSCl the radical
recombination (entry 8) proceeds i) much slower and that, due to the
high steric constraints between the two approaching silylalkoxy
radicals, the radical is ii) reduced to a significant extent by a second
electron to yield the silylated benzyl alcohol. On the other hand, the
bulkiness of the TBDPSCl derived silylalkoxy radicals led to an
excellent dl selectivity (Table 1, entry 8), and supported thereby the
direct involvement of silyloxy-moieties in the dimerisation of the ketyl
radicals. To our knowledge this is the first example of a dramatic control
diastereoselectivity of the reaction is predominantly controlled by the
trialkylsilyl chloride used for the activation.
Acknowledgements:
Financial
support
by
the
Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bonn, and the Fonds der Chemischen
Industrie, Frankfurt, is gratefully acknowledged. We also thank the
BASF, Ludwigshafen, and the Bayer AG, Leverkusen, for their generous
supply of chemicals and solvents. Thanks are also due to the Alexander-
von-Humboldt foundation for a fellowship (1997-1998) for A.S. and
Mr. Claus Schreiber for assistance.
of diastereoselectivity by
pinacolisation reactions.
a trialkylsilyl chloride additive in
References and Notes:
(1) (a) Wirth, T. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 61. (b)
Dushin, R.G. In Comprehensive Organometallic Chemistry II;
Hegedus, L.S. Ed.; Pergamon; Oxford, 1995; Vol. 12, pp 1071. (c)
Robertson, G.M. In Comprehensive Organic Synthesis; Trost,
B.M. Ed.; Pergamon; New York, 1991, Vol. 3, pp 563.
(2) (a) Maury, O.; Villiers, C.; Ephritikhine, M. New J. Chem. 1997,
21, 137. (b) Fürstner, A.; Csuk, R.; Rohrer, C.; Weidmann, H. J.
Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. I 1988, 1729.
Scheme 2
(3) (a) Tsukinoki, T.; Kawaji, T.; Hashimoto, I.; Mataka, S.; Tashiro,
M. Chem. Lett. 1997, 235. (b) Banerjee, A.K.; Sulbaran de
Carrasco, M.C.; Frydrych-Houge, C.S.V.; Motherwell, W.B.
Chem. Commun. 1986, 1803.
The synthetic scope of the catalytic system was further evaluated by
using the carbonyl compounds 1c-i and the reagent combinations listed
in Table 3. As a matter of fact, the system tolerated functional groups at
the aromatic nucleus, and the corresponding pinacols were isolated in
synthetically useful yields throughout. The aliphatic aldehyde (1h)
proved to be inert, while the α,β-unsaturated cinnamyl aldehyde (1i)
yielded a complex mixture of products.
(4) (a) Yanada, R.; Negoro, N.; Yanada, K.; Fujita, T. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1997, 38, 3271. (b) Honda, T.; Katoh, M. J. Chem. Soc.
Chem. Commun. 1997, 369. (c) Akane, N.; Kanagawa, Y.;
Nishiyama, Y.; Ishi, Y., Chem. Lett. 1992, 2431. (d) Shiue, J.S.;
Lin. C.C.; Fang, J.M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 335. (e) Namy,
J.L.; Souppe, J.; Kagan, H.B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 765.
(5) (a) Lipski, T.A., Hilfiker, M.A., Nelson, S.G. J. Org. Chem. 1997,
62, 4566. (b) Gansäuer, A.. Chem. Commun. 1997, 457. (c)
Gansäuer, A. Synlett 1997, 363. (d) Barden, M.C.; Schwartz, J. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 5484.
(6) (a) Hirao, T.; Hasegawa, T.; Muguruma, Y.; Ikeda, I. J. Org.
Chem. 1996, 61, 366. (b) Fürstner, A; Shi, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1996, 118, 12349. (c) Matsubara, S.; Horiuchi, M.; Takai, K.;
Utimoto, K. Chem. Lett. 1995, 259.
(7) (a) Knecht, M.; Boland, W. Synlett 1993, 837. (b) Knecht, M.
Dissertation, University Bonn, 1994.
(8) Svatoš, A.; Boland, W. unpublished results.
(9) Hodgeson, D.M. J. Organometall. Chem. 1994, 476, 1, see note in
ref. 6b.
Since the exchange of the organic ligands of complexes of
(10) (a) Davis, D.D.; Bigelow, W.B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 5127.
(b) Conant, J.B.; Cutter, H.B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1926, 48, 1016.
organometallic compounds can be used in principle to optimise and
6a,b
control the selectivity and reaction rate,
we also tested (BiPy) Cr(III)
3
(11) Handlír, K, Holecek, J, Klikorka, J. Z. Chem. 1979, 19, 265.
(12) Clerici, A.; Porta, O. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 3872.
and compared commercial chromocene with a complex produced in situ
and Cr(III) salts (Table 3). The (BiPy) Cr(III) complex failed to
3
catalyse the pinacol formation, but chromocene induced pinacolisation
at comparable rates to Cr(III)-chloride. The ratio of the d,l/meso-
products was, however, not affected. To eliminate the possibility, that
General synthetic procedure: A dry 50 ml two-necked round-bottom
flask equipped with condenser and Teflon -faced stirrer bar, containing
®
the metal powder (15.3 mmol) and the chromium(III) salt or a
chromium complex (0.2 mmol), was sealed with a septum and
evacuated with stirring for 10 min (oil pump). Then, the flask was
purged with argon and solvent(s) (ca. 10 ml) containing dodecane as an
internal standard (100 µl) were added. After stirring for ca. 2 min the
chloro trialkylsilane (8.8 mmol) was injected over a period of ca. 1 min
resulting in a violent reaction and gas evolution. This mixture was
stirred at the reaction temperature (see Tables; generally 65°C) and the
neat carbonyl compound or a solution of the carbonyl compound in an
appropriate solvent (4 mmol) was injected within 1-2 min. Stirring was
this might be due to partially destroyed chromocene, which is known to
10
be strongly air-sensitive, the complex was prepared in situ from CrCl
2
-
+
and C H Na . As a matter of fact, the in situ production of the
5
5
catalytically active complex proved to be superior and provided a more
reactive catalyst (Table 3, entries 20 and 23).
In conclusion, the pinacol reductive coupling is effectively catalysed by
1-2 mol % Cr(II) salts or chromocene co-reduced with cheap manganese
powder. The coupling showed excellent selectivity for aromatic and
heteroaromatic aldehydes and ketones. The reaction rate and the