Fig. 2 Photophysical studies on bichromophores 1 and 2. A: Transient
absorption spectrum for the SR isomer upon 355 nm laser excitation. A
similar spectrum was obtained for the SS isomer. B: Decay traces observed
for both isomers at 330 nm.
Fig. 1 Photocyclization of bichromophores 1 and 2. A: monitoring of BZP
absorption band disappearance for the SR isomer. Similar spectra were
obtained for the SS isomer, although reaction times were higher. B:
comparison of the results obtained for both diastereomers.
initiation step of photodynamic lipid peroxidation, and thus cell
membrane disruption, might be more easily promoted by one of
the drug enantiomers. Hence, although the results here obtained
with the intramolecular process in model systems should not be
overemphasized, it appears that photooxidation of polyunsatu-
rated fatty acid may be a stereoselective process.
Financial support by the Spanish DGICYT (Project PB
97/0339 and postdoctoral grant to L. A. M.) is gratefully
acknowledged.
of a new asymmetric center upon cyclization (i.e. the reduced
carbonyl carbon) is responsible for the formation of a pair of
diastereomers starting either from 1 or from 2.
Remarkably, the rate of photocyclization upon steady state
photolysis was clearly higher in the case of 1 (SR diastereomer).
The reaction was followed by monitoring the disappearance of
the typical BZP absorption band centered at ca. 254 nm. This is
shown in Fig. 1A. Fig. 1B compares the results obtained for the
SR and SS bichromophores. Thus, after 5 min of irradiation in
acetonitrile solution, more than 60% of starting 1 was consumed
while under similar conditions only 20% of SS isomer 2 had
reacted. As the coupling products are generated upon intra-
molecular cyclization of an intermediate biradical, these results
suggest that the key hydrogen abstraction process is ster-
eoselective.
In order to gain some mechanistic insight, photophysical
studies were also carried out on both bichromophores. Upon
laser excitation (Nd:YAG, 355 nm) of 1023 M acetonitrile
solutions of both esters, the recorded transient spectra showed
two bands with maxima at ca. 330 and 540 nm (Fig. 2A). The
decay traces at 330 nm (see Fig. 2B) allowed to determine the
lifetimes (t = 1.8 and 1.6 ms for 1 and 2, respectively). The
transients were assigned as the biradicals formed upon intra-
molecular hydrogen abstraction. In connection with the ster-
eoselectivity of the photoreduction process, it was very
interesting to realize that biradical formation was ca. 30% more
efficient for the SR isomer. This explains the results obtained in
the steady-state experiments.
The observed stereoselectivity may be due to the fact that,
according to 3D models, the methyl group at C-2 of (S)-
DCHDM hinders both hydrogen abstraction and cyclization of
the resulting biradical as compared to (R)-DCHDM. The
destabilizing interaction between this methyl group and the a-
carbonyl methyl can also be clearly observed in the models of
the final products 3 and 4.
Summarizing, this work reports an unprecedented ster-
eoselective photoreduction of a chiral BZP upon intramolecular
hydrogen abstraction. This stereoselectivity is observed in the
steady state as well as in time-resolved studies. Since KP is a
chiral photosensitizing drug, our results suggest that the
Notes and references
1 M. V. Encinas and J. C. Scaiano, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1981, 103, 6393; J.
C. Scaiano, E. B. Abuin and L. C. Stewart, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1982, 104,
5673; P. J. Wagner, M. A. Meador and J. C. Scaiano, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1984, 106, 7988; P. J. Wagner, R. J. Truman and J. C. Scaiano, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1985, 107, 7093; J. C. Scaiano, Handbook of Organic
Photochemistry, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1989; R. W. Redmond, J.
C. Scaiano and L. J. Johnston, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1990, 112, 398; C.
Evans, J. C. Scaiano and K. U. Ingold, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1992, 114,
4589.
2 H. Rau, Chem. Rev., 1983, 83, 535; Y. Inoue, Chem. Rev., 1992, 92,
741.
3 M. A. Miranda, A. Lahoz, R. Martínez-Máñez, F. Boscá, J. V. Castell and
J. Pérez-Prieto, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 11569; M. A. Miranda, A.
Lahoz, F. Boscá, M. R. Metni, F. B. Abdelouahab, J. V. Castell and J.
Pérez-Prieto, Chem. Commun., 2000, 2257.
4 L. J. Martinez and J. C. Scaiano, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119, 11066; S.
Monti, S. Sortino, G. De Guidi and G. Marconi, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday
Trans., 1997, 93, 2269; C. D. Borsarelli, S. E. Braslavsky, S. Sortino, G.
Marconi and S. Monti, Photochem. Photobiol., 2000, 72, 163.
5 J. G. Gould and C. A. Mercurio, J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 1995, 33, 551;
R. T. Nabeya, T. Kojima and M. Fujita, Contact Dermatitis, 1995, 32, 52;
H. Bagheri, V. Lhiaubet, J. L. Montastruc and N. Chouini-Lalanne, Drug
Safety, 2000, 22, 339.
6 C. F. Chignell and R. H. Sik, Photochem. Photobiol., 1998, 67, 591; F.
Boscá and M. A. Miranda, J. Photochem. Photobiol., B, 1998, 43, 1 and
references therein; A. Samadi, L. A. Martínez, M. A. Miranda and I. M.
Morera, Photochem. Photobiol., 2001, 73, 359.
7 H. Van Bekkum, C. B. Van Den Bosch, G. Van Minen-Pathius, J. C. De
Mos and A. M. Van Wijk, Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas., 1971, 90, 137; T.
Linker and L. Fröhlich, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1994, 33, 1971; T.
Linker and L. Fröhlich, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117, 2694.
CHEM. COMMUN., 2002, 280–281
281