COMMUNICATIONS
[6] a) E. Hey, F. Weller, Chem. Commun. 1988, 782; b) R. A. Bartlett,
M. M. Olmstead, P. P. Power, G. A. Sigel, Inorg. Chem. 1987, 26, 1941;
c) G. W. Rabe, G. P. A. Yap, A. L. Rheingold, Inorg. Chem. 1997, 36,
1990; d) G. W. Rabe, S. Kheradmandan, G. P. A. Yap, Inorg. Chem.
1998, 37, 6541; e) G. A. Koutsantonis, P. C. Andrews, C. L. Raston,
Chem. Commun. 1995, 47.
[7] The unique electronic and steric properties of the related 2,4,6-
tris(trifluoromethyl)phenyl substituent have been reviewed:
F. T. Edelman, Comments Inorg. Chem. 1992, 12, 259. See also
ref. [4a].
[8] Formallythis reaction represents a rare example of the nucleophilic
substitution of an organyl group in primary phosphanes. Similar
behavior was reported for Cp*PH2 (Cp* pentamethylcyclopenta-
dienyl): P. Jutzi, G. Reumann, J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 2000, 2237.
[9] Participation of such species in nucleophilic substitution reactions at
phosphorus(iii) centers is known. For a review on this topic, see K. B.
Dillon, Chem. Rev. 1994, 94, 1441.
J(F,C) 273 Hz, CF3), 127.6 and 128.1 (s, m-Carom), 170.3 (d, J(C,P)
87 Hz, i-Carom).
[17] G. N. Merill, S. R. Kass, J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 17465.
[18] J. Escudie, C. Couret, H. Ranaivonjatovo, M. Lazraq, J. Satge,
Phosphorus Sulfur 1987, 31, 27.
[19] Gaussian98 (RevisionA.7), M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel,
G. E. Scuseria, M. A. Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, V. G. Zakrzewski, J. A.
Montgomery, R. E. Stratmann, J. C. Burant, S. Dapprich, J. M.
Millam, A. D. Daniels, K. N. Kudin, M. C. Strain, O. Farkas, J. Tomasi,
V. Barone, M. Cossi, R. Cammi, B. Mennucci, C. Pomelli, C. Adamo,
S. Clifford, J. Ochterski, G. A. Petersson, P. Y. Ayala, Q. Cui, K.
Morokuma, D. K. Malick, A. D. Rabuck, K. Raghavachari, J. B.
Foresman, J. Cioslowski, J. V. Ortiz, B. B. Stefanov, G. Liu, A.
Liashenko, P. Piskorz, I. Komaromi, R. Gomperts, R. L. Martin,
D. J. Fox, T. Keith, M. A. Al-Laham, C. Y. Peng, A. Nanayakkara, C.
Gonzalez, M. Challacombe, P. M. W. Gill, B. G. Johnson, W. Chen,
M. W. Wong, J. L. Andres, M. Head-Gordon, E. S. Replogle, J. A.
Pople, Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, 1998.
[20] W. J. Hehre, L. Radom, P. von R. Schleyer, J. A. Pople, Ab Initio
Molecular Orbital Theory, Wiley, New York, 1986.
[21] R. G. Parr, W. Yang in Functional Theory of Atoms and Molecules
(Eds.: R. Breslow, J. B. Goodenough), Oxford UniversityPress, New
York, 1989.
[22] a) A. D. Becke, Phys. Rev. A 1988, 38, 3098; b) A. D. Becke, J. Chem.
Phys. 1993, 98, 5648; c) C. Lee, W. Yang, R. G. Parr, Phys. Rev. 1988,
B37, 785.
[23] SADABS, Program for data correction, Bruker-AXS.
[24] G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 1990, 46, 467.
[25] SHELXL-97, Program for Crystal Structure Refinement, Sheldrick,
G. M. Universityof Gˆttingen, 1997.
[10] Ab initio calculations were performed with the Gaussian 98 pro-
[21]
gram.[19, 20] The densityfunctional method
used was the hybrid
exchange functional B3LYP.[22] This functional includes a linear
combination of a small amount (20%) of exact exchange[22a] with
the Becke 88 gradient-corrected exchange and with the correlation
energyfunctional LYP. [22c] The basis set retained for all calculations is
the 6-31G (d,p) set, since the inclusion of polarization and diffuse
functions is necessaryfor the obtention of accurate energies. The
optimized structure were confirmed as minima on the potential energy
surface bysecond-derivative calculations. All energies were corrected
for zero-point energy(ZPE) and temperature using unscaled density
functional frequencies. Gas-phase acidities of HA (or proton affinities
of AÀ) were calculated by Eanion À Eneutral
.
[11] Crystal data for 3 and 4: 3: C20H28F6KO6P, Mr 548.49, monoclinic,
space group P21/n, a 10.44(6), b 17.38(8), c 14.53(13) ä, b
94.4(3)8, V 2629(30) ä3, Z 4, 1calcd 1.386 MgmÀ3, F(000) 1136,
l 0.71073 ä, T 193(2) K, m(MoKa) 0.337 mmÀ1, crystal size 0.1 Â
0.4 Â 0.7 mm3, 1.83 ꢀ q ꢀ 26.378, 15730 reflections (5367 independent,
Rint 0.0358), Tmin 0.825186, Tmax 1.0, 311 parameters, R1 [I >
2s(I)] 0.0424, wR2 (all data) 0.0985, max. residual electron
density: 0.423 eäÀ3. 4: C28H44F6KO10P, Mr 724.70, monoclinic, space
group P21/c, a 11.964(2), b 12.251(2), c 23.154(3) ä, b
Cation-Promoted Hierarchical Formation of
Supramolecular Assemblies of Self-Organized
Helical Molecular Components**
96.195(3)8, V 3374.0(8) ä3, Z 4, 1calcd 1.427 MgmÀ3
F(000)
,
1520, l 0.71073 ä, T 173(2) K, m(MoKa) 0.290 mmÀ1, crystal size
0.01 Â 0.5 Â 0.6 mm3, 1.71 ꢀ q ꢀ 21.978, 13038 reflections (4108 inde-
pendent, Rint 0.0798), Tmin 0.749166, Tmax 1.000000, 4108 param-
eters, 440 restraints, R1 [I > 2s(I)] 0.0599, wR2 (all data) 0.1424,
max. residual electron density: 0.529 eäÀ3. Data for both structures
were collected at low temperature using oil-coated shock-cooled
crystals on a Bruker-AXS CCD 1000 diffractometer. Semi-empirical
Anne Petitjean, Louis A. Cuccia, Jean-Marie Lehn,*
¬ ¡
Helene Nierengarten, and Marc Schmutz
Helical conformations of organic and inorganic entities
have received much attention as a result of their occurence in
many biological systems. Maintained by multiple hydrogen
bonds and electrostatic interactions, a-helices are involved in
absorption corrections were employed.[23] The structures were solved
[24]
bydirect methods (SHELXS-97)
and refined using the least-
squares method on F2.[25] CCDC-166948 (3) and -166949 (4) contains
the supplementarycrystallographic data for this paper. These data can
ving.html (or from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12,
Union Road, Cambridge CB21EZ, UK; fax: (44)1223-336-033; or
deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk).
[*] Prof. Dr. J.-M. Lehn, A. Petitjean, Dr. L. A. Cuccia
¬
Laboratoire de Chimie Supramoleculaire, ISIS-ULP
4 rue Blaise Pascal, 67000 Strasbourg (France)
Fax : (33)390-24-11-17
[12] The Lewis acid base interaction between K and F centers has already
been observed in potassium 2,4,6-tris(trifluoromethyl)phenoxide, see
S. Brooker, F. T. Edelmann, T. Kottke, H. W. Roesky, G. M. Sheldrick,
D. Stalke, K. H. Whitmire, Chem. Commun. 1991, 144.
[13] V. L. Rudzevich, H. Gornitzka, V. D. Romanenko, G. Bertrand, 2001,
unpublished results.
Dr. H. Nierengarten
¬
Laboratoire de Spectrometrie
de Masse Bio-Organique, ECPM
25 rue Becquerel, 67000 Strasbourg (France)
Dr. M. Schmutz
¬
¬
¬
Institut de Genetique et de Biologie Moleculaire et Cellulaire, CNRS/
INSERM/ULP
[14] S. Sasaki, F. Murakami, M. Yoshifuji, Angew. Chem. 1999, 111, 351;
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 340.
BP 163, 67404 Illkirch (France)
[15] For comparaison, calculations have shown that the phosphorus atom
of the phenylphosphanide bears a charge of À0.43.
[**] Dr. R. P. Thummel is thanked for providing helpful advice for the
preparation of 4-aminopyrimidine-5-carboxaldehyde. We are indebt-
[16] Selected NMR data for 4 ([D8]THF, À508C): 1H NMR: d 3.02 (dqq,
1H, J(P,H) 161 Hz, J(H,F) 10 Hz and 4 Hz, PH), 5.69 (pseudo-t,
1H, J(H,H) 7.5 Hz, p-Harom), 6.80 and 6.81 (m, 1H, m-Harom); 19F
NMR: d 8.4 (dd, 3F, J(F,P) 72 Hz, J(F,H) 10 Hz, CF3), 10.2 (dd,
3F, J(F,P) 9 Hz, J(F,H) 4 Hz, CF3); 31P NMR: d À70 (dqq,
J(P,H) 161 Hz, J(P,F) 72, 9 Hz); 13C{1H} NMR: 105.9 (d, J(C,P)
6 Hz, p-Carom), 125.2 and 125.3 (m, o-Carom), 126.8 and 127.1 (q,
¬
ed to Dr. Andre Mathis (Institut Charles Sadron) for his kind help
with powder diffraction studies. This work was supported bythe
¡
French ™Ministere de la Recherche et de la Technologie∫. L.A.C.
¡
thanks the College de France and the CNRS for post-doctoral
fellowships. M.S. acknowledges the financial support of INSERM,
CNRS, and HUS.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, No. 7
¹ WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH, 69451 Weinheim, Germany, 2002
1433-7851/02/4107-1195 $ 20.00+.50/0
1195