affording triene ester 7. Again, very high diastereoselectivity
(Z:E > 20:1) was observed.10 However, despite many
attempts, we were unable to convert 7 into the aldehyde 9
as a precursor for the final olefination. This was mostly due
to the instability of the intermediary allylic alcohol 8 toward
aqueous workup. Furthermore, 7 readily underwent disro-
tatory electrocyclization at room temperature to afford
cyclohexadiene carboxylate 10. Unfortunately, this reaction
proved to be essentially irreversible, rendering 10 useless
as an intermediate in our synthesis.
In an attempt to avoid the unwanted 6π-electrocyclization
and to circumvent sensitive triene intermediates, we decided
to install the third double bond at a later stage of the synthesis
via stereospecific syn elimination of a secondary hydroxy
group (Scheme 3). This strategy was again inspired by
secondary alcohol as the TBS ether gave 14. Reduction of
14 afforded a sensitive aldehyde that was subjected to a
Horner-Wadsworth-Emmons olefination with the known
phosphono γ-butyrolactone 15.15 This afforded (Z)-config-
ured alkylidene lactone 16 as the major diastereomer.10 The
deprotection of 16 proved surprisingly difficult, presumably
as a result of steric hindrance of the silyl ether. Nevertheless,
it could be achieved by treating 16 with HF-pyridine in
methanol to afford secondary alcohol 17.16
Unfortunately, all attempts to effect dehydration of 17 via
syn elimination leading to tetraene 18 and ultimately 19 were
unsuccessful. Exposure of 17 to Burgess’ reagent,17 DCC/
CuCl,18 or other dehydrating conditions, as well as attempts
to prepare the corresponding xanthates, only led to complex,
intractable product mixtures.
At this point we decided to resort to transition metal
catalyzed cross-couplings along the central σ bond of the
desired tetraene system (Scheme 4).19 This highly convergent
strategy was initially set aside because of anticipated
difficulties in procuring the corresponding (Z)-substituted
vinyl halide and vinylmetalloid building blocks.
Scheme 3a
Eventually, however, it was found that aldehyde 3
underwent a clean Stork-Zhao olefination20 to afford trisub-
stituted vinyl iodide 20 as the sole isolable diastereomer.10
Furthermore, the known (Z)-substituted vinyl iodide 22 could
be obtained in one step from propargyl alcohol (21) through
a stereoselective carbocupration/iodination sequence.21 Oxi-
dation of the allylic alcohol function with concomitant
olefination of the unstable intermediary aldehyde following
Barrett’s protocol22 afforded iodo dienoate 23.23 Conversion
of this material into the sensitive vinyl stannane 24 set the
stage for the key cross coupling of the two fragments.24
In the event, reaction of 20 and 24 in the presence of
catalytic amounts of Pd(MeCN)2Cl225 afforded bicyclo[4.2.0]-
octadiene 27 in 40% overall yield (not optimized). This
tandem transformation presumably proceeds through the
intermediacy of tetraene ester 25, which undergoes a rapid
(13) Heathcock, C. H. In Modern Synthetic Methods; Scheffold, R., Ed.;
VCH: Weinheim, 1992; pp 1-102 and references therein.
(14) (a) Nahm, S.; Weinreb, S. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981, 22, 3815.
(b) Evans, D. A.; Gage, J. R.; Leighton, J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114,
9434.
(15) (a) Lee, K.; Jackson, J. A.; Wiemer, D. F. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58,
5967. (b) Snider, B. B.; Lu, Q. Synth. Commun. 1997, 27, 1583.
(16) Nicolaou, K. C.; Daines, R. A.; Chakraborty, T. K.; Ogawa, Y. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 4685.
a Reagents and conditions: (a) Dess-Martin periodinane, CH2Cl2,
rt. (b) 11, Bu2BOTf, Et3N, THF, -78 f 0 °C (90% from 6). (c)
MeHNOMe‚HCl, AlMe3, PhMe, rt (78%). (d) TBSCl, Im, DMF,
DMAP, rt (99%). (e) DIBAH, CH2Cl2, -78 °C. (f) 15, KHMDS,
18-C-6, THF, -78 f 0 °C (63% from 14). (g) HF-Py, Py, MeOH,
rt (76%).
(17) Burgess, E. M.; Penton, H. R.; Taylor, E. A. J. Org. Chem. 1973,
38, 26.
(18) (a) Knight, S. D.; Overman, L. E.; Pairaudeau, G. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1995, 117, 5776. (b) Alexandre, D.; Rouessac, F. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr.
1971, 1837.
(19) For a review, see: Metal-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions;
Diederich, F., Stang, P. J., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 1998.
(20) (a) Stork, G.; Zhao, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 2173. (b) Chen,
J.; Wang, T.; Zhao, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 2827.
(21) (a) Duboudin, J. G.; Jousseaume, B.; Bonakdar, A. J. Organomet.
Chem. 1979, 168, 227. (b) Han, Q.; Wiemer, D. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992,
114, 7692.
(22) Barrett, A. G. M.; Hamprecht, D.; Ohkubo, M. J. Org. Chem. 1997,
62, 9376.
(23) Unfortunately, all attempts to effect an analogous condensation with
phosphonolactone 15 were unsuccessful because of the instability of (Z)-
3-iodomethacrolein under the reaction conditions.
biogenetic considerations. The biosynthesis of the hypotheti-
cal precursor 1 presumably involves several reduction and
dehydration steps mediated by a polypropionate synthase
complex.
Dess-Martin oxidation of allylic alcohol 6, followed by
reaction of the crude product with the boron enolate of
oxazolidinone 1112 afforded aldol 12 with the expected high
syn diastereoselectivity.10,13 Conversion of 12 into the Wein-
reb amide 13,14 followed by protection of the hindered
(24) (a) Vanderwal, C. D.; Vosburg, D. A.; Sorensen, E. J. Org. Lett.
2001, 3, 4307. (b) Scott, W. J.; Stille, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108,
3033.
(12) Gage, J. R.; Evans, D. A. Organic Syntheses; Wiley: New York,
1993; Collect. Vol. VIII, p 339.
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 13, 2002
2223