Fmoc protection followed by TEMPO oxidation (TEMPO
) 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-piperidine-1-oxyl) leads to unprotected
Fmoc-Gum-OH.1a To date, Fmoc-Gum(Bn)3-OH 19 was
synthesized in a 12-step synthesis starting from D-gluco-
pyranose (overall yield 3%).1d,e Herein we present an
alternative pathway starting from compound 17 (Scheme 2).
Table 1. Synthesized Cyclic Oligomers
Cyclo[Gum(R)3-Xaa1-Gum(R)3-Xaa2] (R ) H or Bn; XaaX )
Gly, L-Ala, D-Ala, L-Phe, D-Phe, L-Lys, or D-Lys)
cyclo[Gum(R)3-Xaa1-Gum(R)3-Xaa2]
R ) H
R ) Bn
Xaa1
Xaa2
1
2
3
4
9
10
11
12
5
6
7
8
Gly
L-Ala
L-Ala
D-Ala
L-Lys
L-Lys
D-Lys
D-Lys
L-Lys(Boc)
L-Lys(Boc)
D-Lys(Boc)
D-Lys(Boc)
Gly
L-Ala
D-Ala
D-Ala
L-Phe
D-Phe
L-Phe
D-Phe
L-Phe
D-Phe
L-Phe
D-Phe
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Fmoc-Gum(Bn)3-OH 19a
13
14
15
16
a Reaction conditions: (a) Boc2O, THF, H2O, 81% starting from
compound 18. (b) MMTr-Cl, TEA, DMAP, DMF, 78%. (c) BnBr,
18-crown-6, KOH, THF, 63%. (d) (1) 20 vol % TFA in DCM,
H2O; (2) Fmoc-Cl, NaHCO3, THF, H2O, 71%. (e) TEMPO, KBr,
TBABr, NaOCl, DCM, NaCl, NaHCO3, H2O, 96%.
(six atoms, similar to a dipeptide unit; see above). Lys was
chosen to allow further side chain functionalization, whereas
Phe was used to simplify the procedure of HPLC separation,
since Phe can easily be detected by UV spectroscopy.
Furthermore, D-Phe shows structurally induced tendencies
and exhibits better separation of NMR signals. Similar
compounds with furanoid SAAs were already described
previously.5
Boc protection of 17 was realized in situ under standard
conditions8 with Boc2O. Reaction of monomethoxytrityl
chloride (1.1 equiv) with Boc-N-(â-D-glucopyranosyl)-
methylamine in DMF solution overnight at room temperature
in the presence of catalytic amounts of 4-(dimethylamino)-
pyridine (DMAP) and triethylamine (TEA, 1.5 equiv)
produced Boc-N-(6-O-MMTr-â-D-glucopyranosyl)methyl-
amine in good yield (78%). Compound 20 was obtained in
63% yield by treating the last compound in THF solution
overnight at room temperature with benzylbromide (3.3
equiv), KOH powder (5.4 equiv), and catalytic amounts of
18-crown-6 under argon. After simultaneous cleavage of the
monomethoxy triphenylmethyl ether and Boc deprotection,
the intermediate was Fmoc protected with Fmoc chloride to
yield Fmoc-N-(2,3,4-tri-O-benzyl-â-D-glucopyranosyl)meth-
ylamine in 71% over two steps. Finally, TEMPO oxidation
in a two-phase system (water/dichloromethane) with tetra-
butylammonium bromide (TBABr) as a phase transfer
catalyst led to the final product Fmoc-Gum(Bn)3-OH 19 in
excellent yields (96%). The overall yield starting from
2,3,4,6-tetra-O-acetyl-R-D-glucopyranosyl bromide was 22%.
Oligomerization of Gum(Bn)3-OH alternating with L-
and D-forms of Ala, Lys, Phe, or Gly, respectively, was
realized by solid-phase synthesis with the Fmoc strategy
using TentaGel S Trt resin (Rapp Polymere), O-(7-aza-
benzotriazol-1-yl)-1,1,3,3-tetramethyl-uronium hexafluoro-
phosphate (HATU),9 and 1-hydroxy-7-azabenzotriazole
(HOAt)10 as coupling reagents and 2,4,6-collidine as a base
in DMF (Scheme 3).
For the synthesis of Gum, â-D-glucopyranosylmethylamine
17 is an important intermediate product for which we present
here a more efficient synthesis (Scheme 1). 2,3,4,6-Tetra-
Scheme 1. Improved Synthesis of
â-D-Glucopyranosylmethylamine 17a
a Reaction conditions: (a) Hg(CN)2, melt, 85 °C, argon atmo-
sphere, 1 h, 81%; (b) LiAlH4, THF, 0 °C.
O-acetyl-R-D-glucopyranosyl bromide reacts with Hg(CN)2
in melt6 in only 1 h and excellent yields (81%) to form
2,3,4,6-tetra-O-acetyl-â-D-glucopyranosylcyanide 18, fol-
lowed by reduction to compound 17. This pathway is much
more efficient than all alternative routes such as the synthesis
of 18 by reaction of pentaacetylglucose with trimethylsilyl-
cyanide (TMSCN)7 or the synthesis of compound 17 by
reduction of â-D-glucopyranosylnitromethane, which is pre-
pared by nitroaldol reaction of glucose in low yield (27%)
with high experimental effort.1a
The azabenzotriazol-based coupling reagents were the most
suitable, since they permit high coupling yields and low
(7) Ko¨ll, P.; Fo¨rtsch, A. Carbohydr. Res. 1987, 171, 3001-315.
(8) Moroder, L.; Hallett, A.; Wu¨nsch, E.; Keller, O.; Wersin, G. Hoppe-
Seyler’s Z. Physiol. Chem. 1976, 357, 1651-1653.
(5) (a) Gruner, S.; Kessler H. Peptides 2000, 313-314. (b) Gruner, S.
A. W.; Truffault, V.; Voll, G.; Locardi, E.; Sto¨ckle, M.; Kessler, H. Eur. J.
Chem., submitted for publication. (c) van Well, R. M.; Overkleeft, H. S.;
Overhand, M.; Vang Carstenen, E.; van der Marel, G. A.; van Boom, J. H.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 9331-9335.
(9) (a) Carpino, L. A.; El-Faham, A.; Minor, C. A.; Albericio, F. J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun. 1994, 201. (b) Albericio, F.; Bofill, J. M.; El-Faham,
A.; Kates, S. A. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 9678-9683.
(6) Fuchs, E.-F.; Lehmann, J. Chem. Ber. 1975, 108, 2254-2260.
(10) Carpino, L. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 4397-4398.
2502
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 15, 2002