agents.19 However, the reported procedure involves the usage of
toxic substances (e.g. H2Se) and leads to formation of various
crystalline phases along with the formation of thin films of
CuInSe2 (e.g. In6Se7, Cu2 2 xSe, InSe, Cu11In9).
This research work is supported by the National University of
Singapore through research grants to J. J. V. (Grant No. R-
143-000-084-112) and K. P. L. (Grant No. R-
143-000-1060-112).
Notes and references
† A creamy white precipitate was formed when InCl3 (0.20 g, 0.90 mmol)
was allowed to react with NaSC(O)Ph, formed in situ by reacting NaOH
(0.11 g, 2.70 mmol) and PhC(O)SH (319 mL, 2.70 mmol), in 30 mL of
water. The solution was stirred for about 30 min and then [Et3NH]+[Ph-
C(O)S]2 in CH2Cl2 (15 mL) (prepared by reacting 106 mL of PhC(O)SH
and 126 mL of NEt3) was added. The yellow CH2Cl2 layer was separated and
layered with light petroleum (bp 35–60 °C) to obtain a cream colored
crystalline precipitate almost immediately. The compound was filtered off,
washed with cold MeOH and Et2O and dried under vacuum. Yield 0.62 g
(89%). Anal. Calc. for C34H36O4S4InN·H2O: C, 52.10; H, 4.89; N, 1.79.
Found: C, 51.78; H, 4.69; N, 2.28%. 1H NMR (CDCl3), d 1.20 (t, 9H,
CH3CH2, J 7.6 Hz), 3.22 (q, 6H, CH3CH2, J 10.9 Hz), 7.30–8.09 (m, 20H,
C6H5). 13C NMR (CDCl3), d 8.61 (CH3CH2), 46.84 (CH3CH2), 127.84 (C2/3
of Ph), 128.68 (C2/3 of Ph), 132.28 (C4 of Ph), 139.41 (C1 of Ph), 202.63
(PhCOS).
Fig. 4 SEM image of CuInS2 thin films grown on a Cu–Si substrate: top
view (top) and side view (bottom).
observed in SEM while the thickness of the film was measured
to be ~ 1 mm (Fig. 4, side view). The grazing angle thin film
XRD in Fig. 3(b) shows only the peaks characteristic of the
CuInS2 phase with no evidence of segregation of Cu2S.
TEM diffraction of the CuInS2 film observed along the [110]
zone axis showing strong Bragg reflections at 004, 220, 112
which is typical of perfectly ordered chalcopyrite structure, as
shown in Fig. 5. Rutherford backscattering measurements¶
show that the composition of the film is homogeneous within 1
‡ Single crystals of the compound 1 were grown by slow diffusion of light
petroleum (bp 35–60 °C) in to a CHCl3 solution of the compound. Crystal
data for 1: orthorhombic, space group, P212121; a
= 12.9124(6), b
= 12.9187(7), c = 21.561(1) Å, Z = 4, V = 3596.6(3) Å3; Dc = 1.447 g
cm23; R1 = 0.0434; wR2 = 0.1029, c = 20.01(3). CCDC reference
crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format.
§ CVD was carried out by thermally evaporating the single source precursor
1 from a boron nitride cup in a vacuum reactor with a dynamic vacuum of
1 3 1025 Torr. The boron nitride cup was maintained at 100 °C. The
substrates were prepared by sputtering 1000 Å of nickel or copper films on
silicon. The substrate temperature was maintained at 400 °C during
growth.
¶ RBS meaurements were carried out using 2 MeV protons with Singletron
accelerator at the Research Center for Nuclear Microscopy. The composi-
tion of the films were simulated using the SIMNRA code.
mm and stoichiometric for CuInS2 (Cu+In+S
=
0.24+0.26+0.50). Therefore the result clearly indicates that the
heterogeneous reaction of 1 with copper affords a more efficient
route for the growth of stoichiometric, highly ordered CuInS2
films.
1 C. Dzionk, H. Metzner, S. Hessler and H. E. Mahnke, Thin Solid Films,
1997, 299, 38.
2 H. J. Moller, Semiconductors for Solar Cells, Artech House, Boston,
MA, 1993, p. 35.
3 Y. L. Wu, H. Y. Lin, C. Y. Sun, M. H. Yang and H. L. Hwang, Thin
Solid Films, 1989, 168, 113.
4 S. P. Grindle, C. W. Smith and S. D. Mittleman, Appl. Phys. Lett., 1979,
35, 24.
5 S. V. Krishnaswamy, A. S. Manocha and J. R. Szedon, J. Vac. Sci.
Technol. Part A, 1983, 1, 510.
6 H. L. Hwang, C. Y. Sun, C. S. Fang, C. H. Chang, M. H. Chemg, H. H.
Yang, H. H. Liu and H. Tunan-Mu, J. Cryst. Growth, 1981, 55, 116.
7 A. N. Tiwari, D. K. Pandya and K. L. Chopra, Thin Solid Films, 1985,
130, 217.
8 W. Hirpo, S. Dhingra, A. C. Sutorik and M. G. Kanatzidis, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1993, 115, 1597.
Fig. 5 Selected area diffraction pattern of CuInS2 along the [110] zone
axis.
9 J. A. Hollingsworth, A. F. Hepp and W. E. Buhro, Chem. Vap.
Deposition, 1999, 5, 105.
10 K. K. Banger, J. Cowen and A. F. Hepp, Chem. Mater., 2001, 13,
3827.
11 R. Nomura, Y. Seki and H. Matsuda, J. Mater. Chem., 1992, 2, 765.
12 R. Nomura, S. Fujii, K. Kanaya and H. Matsuda, Polyhedron, 1990, 9,
361.
13 M. Bochmann, Chem. Vap. Deposition, 1996, 2, 85.
14 P. O’Brien and R. Nomura, J. Mater. Chem., 1995, 5, 1761.
15 A. N. Gleizes, Chem. Vap. Deposition, 2000, 6, 155.
16 M. Lazell, P. O’Brien, D. J. Otway and J. H. Park, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton
Trans., 2000, 4479.
It appears that the vapors of 1 or its decomposed fragments
such as [In(SC(O)Ph)3] have reacted with the Cu metal to form
the pure ternary sulfide films. This reaction is metal-specific
because similar reaction conditions on nickel does not produce
the ternary counterpart. It appears that the observed differences
in the reactivity of Cu and Ni metals towards the vapors of 1
may be attributed to the difference in their redox properties.
The implications of this unprecedented heterogenous reac-
tion are as follows. This new route may open the door for
deposition of thin films where suitable precursor material is not
available. The adherence of the thin films thus obtained may be
better than those obtained by other methods. Further character-
ization and investigation on I–III–VI2 systems are under
progress.
17 G. Shang, K. Kunze, M. J. Hampden-Smith and E. N. Duesler, Chem.
Vap. Deposition, 1996, 2, 242.
18 P. Singh, S. Bhattacharya, V. D. Gupta and H. Nöth, Chem. Ber., 1996,
129, 1093.
Interestingly, CuInSe2 thin films have been obtained by
treating films of Cu–In alloy with H2Se or other chalcogenating
19 J. Bekker, V. Alberts and M. J. Witcomb, Thin Solid Films, 2001, 387,
40.
CHEM. COMMUN., 2002, 1400–1401
1401