metalation of the four-ring to the enhanced s-character of the C–
H-bonds and the ortho-metalating power of the two acetal
groups, that drive this deprotonation reaction selectively.10
Workup of the formed anion with DMF provided the
complex 3 in 78% yield after chromatography. Ohira’s
reagent11 converts the aldehyde group of 3 into an alkyne that is
further protected by lithiation and reaction with triethyl-
chlorosilane to give 4. Repetition of the metalation/carbonyla-
tion/alkynylation process with 4 as substrate furnishes the para-
diyne 5, in which the protecting group is lost during the
K2CO3-promoted Ohira reaction. Pd-catalyzed arylation trans-
forms 5 into 6 (80% yield). In the last steps of the reaction
sequence, the acetal groups are cleaved off 6, and a double
Ohira reaction converts the intermediate dialdehyde into the
title compound 7 in 54% yield.
As a proof of this concept we explored the chemistry of the
major isomer 2a and have transformed it in an analogous
reaction sequence into complex 9, in which two free alkyne
groups and two free aldehyde functionalities reside on the
cyclobutadiene complex. This material is surprisingly stable
and can be manipulated in air at ambient temperature. The
dialdehyde 9 is an attractive building block for further
elaboration of linear, cyclic and star-shaped organometallic
cyclobutadiene architectures.
The tetrayne 7 is stable and can be handled under ambient
laboratory conditions without decomposition. Due to the
unusual tetragonal symmetry of the ligand we performed a
single crystal X-ray structure determination. Suitable needle-
shaped specimen were grown from dichloromethane.‡ Fig. 1
shows the ORTEP of 7; bond lengths and bond angles are in
excellent agreement with literature reported values for alkyny-
lated cyclobutadiene complexes.1,3,4 The four-membered ring is
square with angles in the range of 89–91°, and, typical for
cyclobutadiene complexes, the alkyne groups are bent away on
average by 10° from the side of the cyclopentadienylcobalt
fragment. This feature is observed in other tetraalkynylated
cyclobutadiene complexes and is attributed to electronic
effects.4
In conclusion, we have developed a solution-phase route to
tetraethynylated, CpCo-stabilized cyclobutadiene complexes.
We have executed a stepwise solution-phase synthesis for the
hitherto unknown para-substituted complex 7, and could show
with the transformation of 2a into 9 that it will work similarly in
the case of the corresponding ortho-substituted substrate 2a.
With this methodology, almost complete control over the
regiochemistry of the substitution of cyclopentadienylcobalt-
stabilized cyclobutadiene complexes is achieved. In future we
will report upon the use of these building blocks for novel
organometallic oligomers, polymers, cycles and polycycles.
U. H. F. B. and M. L. thank the National Science Foundation
(CAREER CHE 9981765, 2000–2003). U. H. F. B. is a Camille
Dreyfus Teacher–Scholar (2000–2004).
Notes and references
b109848a/ for crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format.
1 U. H. F. Bunz, Y. Rubin and Y. Tobe, Chem. Soc. Rev., 1999, 28, 107;
U. H. F. Bunz, Top. Curr. Chem., 1999, 201, 131; U. H. F. Bunz, Synlett,
1997, 1117.
2 For reviews, see: F. Diederich and L. Gobbi, Top. Curr. Chem., 1999,
201, 44; F. Diederich and Y. Rubin, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1992,
31, 1101; F. Diederich, Nature, 1994, 369, 199.
3 M. Altmann, G. Roidl, V. Enkelmann and U. H. F. Bunz, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl., 1997, 36, 1107; U. H. F. Bunz, G. Roidl, M. Altmann, V.
Enkelmann and K. D. Shimizu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 10 719;
U. H. F. Bunz and V. Enkelmann, Organometallics, 1994, 13, 3823.
4 M. Laskoski, G. Roidl, M. D. Smith and U. H. F. Bunz, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 2001, 40, 1460.
5 M. M. Haley, J. J. Pak and S. C. Brand, Top. Curr. Chem., 1999, 201,
82.
6 R. Diercks, J. C. Armstrong, R. Boese and K. P. C. Vollhardt, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1986, 25, 268.
7 J. D. Tovar, N. Jux, T. Jarrosson, S. I. Kahn and Y. Rubin, J. Org.
Chem., 1997, 62, 3432; N. Jux, K. Holczer and Y. Rubin, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl., 1996, 35, 1985; Y. Tobe, K. Kubota and K. Naemura, J.
Org. Chem., 1997, 62, 3430.
8 Z. Wu, S. Lee and J. S. Moore, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1992, 114, 8730; M.
M. Haley, S. C. Brand and J. J. Pak, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1997,
36, 835.
9 J. R. Fritch and K. P. C. Vollhardt, Organometallics, 1982, 1, 590.
10 U. Bunz, Organometallics, 1993, 12, 3594.
11 S. Ohira, Synth. Lett., 1989, 19, 561; D. F. Taber and Y. Wang, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1997, 119, 22; S. Müller, B. Liepold, G. J. Roth and H. J.
Bestmann, Synlett, 1996, 521; the reagent was originally introduced by
Seferth et al.: D. Seyferth, R. S. Marmor and P. Hilbert, J. Org. Chem.,
1971, 36, 1379; D. G. Brown, E. J. Velthuisen, J. R. Commerford, R. G.
Brisbois and T. R. Hoye, J. Org. Chem., 1996, 61, 2540.
Fig. 1 ORTEP of the tetraethynylated cyclobutadiene complex 7. Bond
lengths and bond angles are in excellent agreement with literature reported
values for multiply alkynylated cyclobutadiene complexes.
Chem. Commun., 2001, 2590–2591
2591