C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Scheme 3 a
Scheme 4 a
a Conditions: [a] (i) 1-phenyl-5-mercapto-tetrazole, DIAD, PPh3, THF,
91%; (ii) (NH4)6Mo7O24(H2O)7, EtOH/CH2Cl2, 67%; [b] (i) LiHMDS, DME,
-78 °C, then 6, 61%; (ii) H2 (1 atm), Pd/C, EtOAc, 72%; [c] TBAF, THF,
95%; [d] PCC, CH2Cl2, 83%.
a Conditions: [a] Ti(OiPr)4, ligand 12 (cat.), reagent 11 (5 equiv), 81%;
[b] 3,4,6-tri-O-benzyl-2-O-methyl-R-D-glucopyranosyl trichloroacetimidate,8
TMSOTf cat., CH2Cl2/MeCN, 87%; [c] H2 (1 atm), Pd/C, EtOH/EtOAc
(2:1), 88%.
aldehyde 6 was prepared in high overall yield as surrogate of first
choice for the lateral fragment D.8
With this building block in hand, the delicate fragment coupling
A + D was investigated by taking recourse to a Julia-Kocienski
olefination strategy.7 The somewhat higher kinetic acidity together
with the better accessibility of the terminal sulfone in 7 might allow
for selective deprotonation at that site without damaging the more
encumbered lactone moieties; the resulting anion should be suf-
ficiently stabilized to withstand attack on the ester groups. After
some experimentation it was found that the use of LiHMDS in DME
at -78 °C in fact meets these stringent criteria. Specifically, reaction
of the lithio sulfone derived from 7 with aldehyde 6 delivers the
corresponding alkene in 61% yield (E:Z ≈ 1:1) (Scheme 3) which
was hydrogenated over Pd/C in EtOAc to facilitate the analysis of
the NMR spectra. We are unaware of any precedence for Julia-
type olefination reactions involving sulfones bearing such a base-
labile â-hydroxy ester motif.
Standard deprotection of the residual silyl ether in 8 followed
by oxidation of the resulting alcohol 9 with PCC affords the
rather labile aldehyde 10 which readily reacts with the diorgano-
zinc reagent 118 in the presence of a catalyst formed in situ from
Ti(OiPr)4 and the (S,S)-configured bistriflate 12 as the controller
ligand to give alcohol 13 in 81% yield.9 Subsequent â-selective
glucosidation via the trichloroacetimidate method was ensured by
using TMSOTf in CH2Cl2/MeCN as the promotor system.10
Exhaustive debenzylation of product 14 thus formed by hydro-
genolysis over Pd/C cleanly provided cycloviracin B1 (1) (Scheme
4). Not only are all analytical and spectroscopic data in excellent
agreement with those reported in the literature, but the pattern
signature in the 1H NMR spectrum is superimposable to that
depicted in ref 1. This completes the first total synthesis of this
antiviral agent and provisionally establishes the absolute stereo-
chemistry of the chiral centers residing on the fatty acid residues
as (3R,19S,25R,3′R,17′S,23′R).6 Studies aiming at the elucidation
of the pharmacophore of this compound as well as at the synthesis
of related glycolipids will be reported soon.
Acknowledgment. Generous financial support by the DFG
(Leibniz Award to A.F.), the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
(fellowship for J.M.), and the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie is
gratefully acknowledged.
Supporting Information Available: Full experimental details,
spectroscopic data, and copies of pertinent NMR spectra of compounds
1 and 14 (PDF). This material is available free of charge via the Internet
References
(1) (a) Tsunakawa, M.; Komiyama, N.; Tenmyo, O.; Tomita, K.; Kawano,
K.; Kotake, C.; Konishi, M.; Oki, T. J. Antibiot. 1992, 45, 1467. (b)
Tsunakawa, M.; Kotake, C.; Yamasaki, T.; Moriyama, T.; Konishi, M.;
Oki, T. J. Antibiot. 1992, 45, 1472.
(2) (a) Fu¨rstner, A.; Mu¨ller T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 7814. (b) Fu¨rstner,
A.; Radkowski, K.; Grabowski, J.; Wirtz, C.; Mynott, R. J. Org. Chem.
2000, 65, 8758. (c) Fu¨rstner, A.; Konetzki, I. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63,
3072. (d) Fu¨rstner, A.; Jeanjean, F.; Razon, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2002, 41, 2097. (e) Fu¨rstner, A.; Konetzki, I. Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 15071.
(3) Poss, C. S.; Schreiber, S. L. Acc. Chem. Res. 1994, 27, 9.
(4) Fu¨rstner, A.; Albert, M.; Mlynarski, J.; Matheu, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2002, 124, 1168.
(5) Details will be reported in a forthcoming full paper.
(6) If the fatty acids are drawn in a zigzag conformation, all hydroxyl groups
are located on the same side; the fact that the centers at C-17′ and C-19
are S-configured while the other ones are R-configured simply reflects
the formalism of the Cahn-Ingold-Prelog nomenclature.
(7) Blakemore, P. R.; Cole, W. J.; Kocienski, P. J.; Morley, A. Synlett 1998,
26.
(8) For details see the Supporting Information.
(9) (a) Takahashi, H.; Kawakita, T.; Ohno, M.; Yoshioka, M.; Kobayashi, S.
Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 5691. (b) Knochel, P. Synlett 1995, 393.
(10) Schmidt, R. R.; Kinzy, W. AdV. Carbohydr. Chem. Biochem. 1994, 50,
21.
JA027346P
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 124, NO. 35, 2002 10275