Reddy et al.
TABLE 3. Selected Op tim ized Bon d Len gth s (Å)
ion
C+-C1
C+-O
H2C-O
H2C-CH2
C1-C2
C2-C3
C3-C4
C4-C5
2 (C2v
4 (C2)
5 (C2v
6 (D2h
7 (D3h
)
)
)
)
1.429
1.456
1.453
1.460
1.471
1.302
1.292a
1.285a
1.288
1.283
1.469
1.485a
1.486a
1.486
1.499
1.540
1.538
1.541
1.541
1.543
1.414
1.435
1.402
1.408
1.404
1.386
1.402
1.402
1.389
1.404
1.401
1.402
1.413
1.408
1.404
1.390
1.393
1.389
1.404
a
Average.
tures by comparing the GIAO/DFT-derived δ13C with the
experimental values. The meta- and para-substituted
carbodications (5 and 6) are similar in energy, while the
ortho-substituted carbodication (4) is much higher in
energy, reflecting increased steric hindrance in the latter
cation, which precludes significant resonance stabiliza-
tion from the aromatic ring. The carbotrication 7, on the
other hand, derives much less stabilization through
delocalization into the aromatic ring.
CH2), 64.31 (t, J ) 148.1 Hz, CH2O), 58.9 (q, J ) 141 Hz,
OCH3), 165.65 (s, >CdO); δ1H 7.22 (s, 4 H, aromatic H), 3.6
(t, 4 H, J ) 4.7 Hz, CO2CH2), 2.84 (t, 4 H, J ) 5.4 Hz, CH2-
OMe), 2.53 (s, 6 H, OCH3).
Compound 15:19 δ13C 131.03 (s, Ar-C1, C3, C5), 134.85 (d, J
) 168.2 Hz, Ar-C2, C4, C6), 70.27 (t, J ) 144.5 Hz, CO2CH2),
64.66 (t, J ) 148 Hz, CH2O), 59.02 (q, J ) 141.52 Hz, OCH3),
164.94 (s, >CdO); δ1H 8.90 (s, 3 H, aromatic H), 4.53 (t, 6 H,
J ) 4.6 Hz, CH2OMe), 3.76 (6 H, t, J ) 4.6 Hz, CH2OMe),
3.44 (s, 9 H, OCH3).
P r ep a r a tion of th e Ca r boca tion s. Approximately 10 mg
of the sample was dissolved in triflic acid or FSO3H in a 5
mm NMR tube at -78 °C (dry ice/acetone bath) and was
followed by warming in the NMR probe to desired tempera-
tures. The formation of the carbodications and the trication is
quantitative as shown by the complete disappearance of the
starting materials.
Exp er im en ta l Section
Triflic acid and FSO3H were freshly distilled prior to use.
Diethyl ether, triethylamine, 2-methoxyethanol, and the aro-
matic acid chlorides were used as received. H and 13C NMR
1
were recorded on a 300 MHz superconducting NMR spectrom-
eter, equipped with a variable-temperature probe, and were
referenced with respect to the residual solvent absorptions
(δ1H CHCl3 ) 7.27, and δ13C CHCl3 ) 77.0). The spectra were
referenced with respect to the external capillary tetrameth-
ylsilane for carbocations. Interpretation of the 13C NMR data
was facilitated by the acquisition of both proton-decoupled and
the proton-coupled 13C NMR spectra, as well as the APT
(attached proton test) experiments. Where applicable, the
smaller J values, indicated next to the directly coupled J
values, in the 13C NMR correspond to the long-range J values.
Gen er a l P r oced u r e for th e P r ep a r a tion of 2-Meth oxy-
eth yl Ben zoa tes. The acid chloride was dissolved in diethyl
ether, 2 molar equiv of triethylamine was added to the
contents, and the mixture was cooled to 0 °C. The 2-methoxy-
ethanol was then added dropwise to the contents using a
hypodermic syringe. A white precipitate of triethylamine
hydrochloride separated during the addition. Workup involving
washing with 5% HCl and saturated sodium bicarbonate
solutions provided the esters in nearly quantitative yields,
essentially pure by NMR analysis. Further purification was
achieved by distillation at reduced pressures. Compound 9:15
δ13C 131.93 (s, Ar-C1, C2), 131.12 (d, J ) 158.6 Hz, Ar-C3,
C6), 129.02 (d, J ) 160.4 Hz, Ar-C4, C5), 70.23 (t, CO2CH2),
64.67 (t, CH2O), 58.97 (q, OCH3), 167.55 (s, >CdO); δ1H 7.76
(dd, 2 H, J ) 5.8, 3.0 Hz, aromatic C3-H, C6-H), 7.53 (dd, 2 H,
J ) 5.8 Hz, 3.0 Hz, aromatic C4-H, C5-H), 4.46 (t, 4 H, J ) 4.6
Hz, CO2CH2), 3.69 (t, 4 H, J ) 4.6 Hz, CH2OMe), 3.40 (s, 6 H,
OCH3).
Ca lcu la tion a l Meth od s. The structures, energies and 13C
NMR chemical shifts of the carbocations were calculated using
Gaussian-9820 series of programs. The structures of the
carbocations were fully optimized at the B3LYP/6-31G* level.
Vibrational frequencies were calculated at this level to char-
acterize the stationary points as minima (NIMIG ) 0), and to
obtain the zero point energies, which were scaled by 0.98.21
The calculations of 13C NMR chemical shifts were performed
using GIAO/DFT method22 at the B3LYP/6-311G* level using
B3LYP/6-31G* geometries. 13C NMR chemical shifts were
referenced to tetramethylsilane (TMS) (calculated absolute
shift, i.e., σ(C) ) 183.8). 17O NMR chemical shifts were
referenced to H2O (calculated absolute shift, i.e., σ(O) ) 332.4).
Ack n ow led gm en t. Support of our work by the
Loker Hydrocarbon Research Institute and the National
Science Foundation is gratefully acknowledged.
Su p p or tin g In for m a tion Ava ila ble: Cartesian coordi-
nates and energies of the optimized structures 2 and 4-7. This
material is available free of charge via the Internet at
http://pubs.acs.org.
J O020753Z
(17) J ones, J . R.; Liotta, C. L.; Collard, D. M.; Schiraldi, D. A.
Macromolecules 2000, 33, 1640-1645.
(18) Wolf, K. H.; Herlinger, H. Angew. Makromol. Chem. 1977, 65,
133-145.
Compound 11:16 δ13C 130.38 (d, J ) 7.8 Hz, Ar-C1, C3),
128.45 (d, J ) 163.5 Hz, Ar-C2), 133.89 (dt, J ) 157.9, 7.3 Hz,
Ar-C4, C6), 130.82 (dt, J ) 167.1, 5.9 Hz, Ar-C5), 70.31 (t, J
) 141 Hz, CO2CH2), 64.26 (t, J ) 147.4 Hz, CH2O), 58.94 (q,
J ) 141 Hz, OCH3), 165.62 (s, >CdO); δ1H 8.74 (d, 1 H, J )
1.22 Hz, aromatic C2-H), 8.26 (dd, 2 H, J ) 7.8, 1.83 Hz,
aromatic C4-C6-H), 7.54 (t, 1 H, J ) 7.6 Hz, aromatic C5-H),
4.51 (t, 4 H, J ) 4.7 Hz, CO2CH2, 3.75 (t, 4 H, J ) 4.7 Hz,
CH2OMe), 3.44 (s, 6 H, OCH3), 3.44 (s, 6 H, OCH3).
(19) Korshak, V. V.; Pavlova, S. A.; Chernomordik, Y. A. Vysokomol.
Soedin., Ser. A 1967, 9, 1033-1038; Chem Abstr. 1967, 68, 87636).
(20) Frisch, M. J .; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.;
Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J . R.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Montgomery, J . A.,
J r.; Stratmann, R. E.; Brurant, J . C.; Dapprich, S.; Millam, J . M.;
Daniels, R. E.; Kudin, K. N.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Tomasi, J .;
Barone, V. M.; Cammi, R.; Mennucci, B.; Pomelli, C.; Adamo, C.;
Clifford, S.; Ochterski, J .; Petersson, G. A.; Ayala, P. Y.; Cui, Q.;
Morokuma, K.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.;
Foresman, J . B.; Cioslowski, J .; Ortiz, J . V.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.;
Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.; Gomperts, R.; Martin, R. L.;
Fox, D. J .; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.;
Gonzalez, C.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.; J ohnson, B.; Chen, W.;
Wong, M. W.; Andres, J . L.; Gonzalez, C.; Head-Gordon, M.; Pople, J .
A. Gaussian 98 (Revision A.5); Gaussian, Inc.: Pittsburgh, PA, 1998.
(21) Foresman, J . B.; Frisch, M. J . Exploring Chemistry with
Electronic Structure Methods; Gaussian Inc.: Pittsburgh, 1996.
(22) Vrcek, V.; Kronja, O.; Siehl, H.-U. J . Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
2 1999, 1317-1321.
Compound 13:16-18 δ13C 133.78 (s, Ar-C1, C4), 129.52 (d, J
) 166.7 Hz, Ar-C2, C3, C5, C6), 70.29 (t, J ) 146.5 Hz, CO2-
(15) Arient, J .; Martincova, O.; Rybarova, P. Czech. 1979; Chem.
Abstr. 1979, 96, 34902.
(16) Lepine, F.; Boismenu, D.; Milot, S.; Mamer, O. A. J . Am. Soc.
Mass Spectrom. 1999, 10, 1248-1252.
3510 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 68, No. 9, 2003