Chemistry Letters 2002
731
was used. On the other hand, it was found that tetrasaccharide 10c
was obtained in 51% yield by only changing the anomeric group
from ꢀ-phenylthio to ꢁ-ethylthio. It should be noted that the ꢁ-
ethylthio glycoside 5c might have been stabilized by the anomeric
effect,15 and that it has lower reactivity than the corresponding ꢀ-
phenylthio glycoside 5a. After screening several protective
groups, the desired tetraglucoside 10e was synthesized in high
yield (total 76% yield based on 3) when p-CF3Bz protected ꢁ-
ethylthio glucoside 5e was used (Entry 5).
subsequent hydrogenolysis.16
It is noted that convergent and convenient total synthesis of
methyl hepta-ꢀ-glucoside 1 having phytoalexin-elicitor activity
was accomplished by one-pot sequential glycosylation reactions.
Fully protected heptasaccharide 11 was rapidly assembled in only
three steps from the component monosaccharides by two one-pot
reactions. It is also noted that the significant reactivity difference
was observed between ꢁ-ethylthio- and ꢀ-phenylthio-glucosides,
which indicated that reactivity tuning of thioglycoside donors is
controlled by their anomeric configurations.
The present research is partially supported by Grant-in-Aids
for Scientific Research from Ministry of Education, Culture,
Sports, Science and Technology. The authors wish to thank Mr.
Hirokazu Ohsawa, Dr. Shigeru Nakajima, and Ms. Chihiro
Suzuki-Sato, Banyu Pharmaceutical Company, for their kind help
concerning mass-spectrometry, NMR, and optical rotation
analysis.
Scheme 2. Double glycosylation of diol 3 with 2.
Table 1. The second one-pot glycosylation of four units
References and Notes
1J. K. Sharp, B. Valent, and P. Albersheim,
J. Biol. Chem., 259, 11312
(1984); J. K. Sharp, M. McNeil, and P. Albersheim, J. Biol. Chem., 259,
11321 (1984).
W. Birberg, P. Fugedi, P. J. Garegg, and A. Pilotti, J. Carbohydr. Chem.,
ꢀ
2
¨
8, 47(1989);N. Hong, Y. Nakahara, andT. Ogawa, Proc. Jpn. Acad., 69,
55 (1993); J. P. Lorentzen, B. Helpap, and O. Lockhoff, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl., 30, 1681 (1991); S. Aldington and S. C. Fry, Adv. Bot.
Res., 19, 1(1993); C. M. Timmers, A. Gijsbert, G. A. van der Marel, H.
Jacques, and J. H. van Boom, Chem. Eur. J., 1, 161 (1995); K. C.
Nicolaou, N. Watanabe, J. Li, J. Pastor, and N. Winssinger, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 37, 1559 (1998); W. Wang and F. Kong, J. Org. Chem.,
ˆ ´
64, 5091(1999); R. Geurtsen, F. Co te, M. G. Hahn, and G.-J. Boons, J.
Org. Chem., 64, 7828 (1999); O. J. Plante, E. R. Palmacci, and P. H.
Seeberger, Science, 291, 1523 (2001).
3
4
R. Verduyn, M. Douwes, P. A. M. van der Klein, E. M. Mosinger, G. A.
¨
Based on the above results, one-pot heptasaccharide synth-
esis using four building blocks was attempted as shown inScheme
3. First, TfOH-catalyzed double glycosylation of 3 with 2,
followed by the armed-disarmed coupling with p-CF3Bz-
protected 5e afforded tetraglucoside 10e as a major product,
which was confirmed by TLC monitoring. Next, the glycosylation
of the above mentioned trisaccharide unit 8 with 10e was tried by
successively adding NIS. As a result, four glycosidic linkages
were formed sequentially in one-pot manners and fully protected
heptaglucoside 11 was obtained stereoselectively in 48% yield
(based on 3). Finally, the protected 11 was converted to the final
product 1 in 95% yield by saponification of Bz groups and
van der Marel, and J. H. van Boom, Tetrahedron, 49, 7301(1993).
One-pot syntheses in this field; H. Yamada, T. Harada, and T.
Takahashi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 116, 7919 (1994); H. Yamada, H.
Takimoto, T. Ikeda, H. Tsukamoto, T. Harada, and T. Takahashi,
Synlett, 2001, 1751.
Review: K. M. Koeller and C.-H. Wong, Chem. Rev., 100, 4465 (2000).
K. Takeuchi, T. Tamura, and T. Mukaiyama, Chem. Lett., 2000, 124.
H. Jona, K. Takeuchi, and T. Mukaiyama, Chem. Lett., 2000, 1278.
O. Kanie, Y. Ito, and T. Ogawa, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 116, 12073 (1994).
G. H. Veeneman and J. H. van Boom, Tetrahedron Lett., 31, 275 (1990);
Z. Zhang, I. R. Ollmann, X.-S. Ye, R. Wischnat, T. Baasov, and C.-H.
Wong, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 121, 734 (1999).
5
6
7
8
9
10 K. Takeuchi, T. Tamura, and T. Mukaiyama, Chem. Lett., 2000, 122.
11 Wm. Rosenbrook, Jr., D. A. Riley, and P. A. Lartey, Tetrahedron Lett.,
26, 3 (1985); G. H. Posner and S. R. Haines, Tetrahedron Lett., 26, 5
(1985).
12 K. Takeo, K. Maki, Y. Wada, and S. Kitamura, Carbohydr. Res., 245, 81
(1993).
13 T. Mukaiyama, H. Jona, and K. Takeuchi, Chem. Lett., 2000, 696.
14 G. H. Veeneman, S. H. van Leeuwen, and J. H. van Boom, Tetrahedron
Lett., 31, 1331 (1990); P. Konradsson, U. E. Udodong, and B. Fraser-
Reid, Tetrahedron Lett., 31, 4313 (1990).
15 R. Geurtsen, D. S. Holmes, and G.-J. Boons, J. Org. Chem., 62, 8145
(1997); E. Juaristi and G. Cuevas, Tetrahedron, 48, 5019 (1992).
16 Spectroscopic data for compound 1 are in fully agreement with those
reported by J. H. van Boom et al.3 Selected 1H NMR (600 MHz, D2O,
285 K, ꢂ ¼ TMS); ꢂ 4.34 (1H, d, J ¼ 8:4 Hz), 4.37 (3H, t, J ¼ 8:4 Hz),
4.58 (1H, d, J ¼ 7:8 Hz), 4.59 (1H, d, J ¼ 7:8 Hz), 4.63 (1H, d,
J ¼ 3:6 Hz) (anomeric positions); Selected 13C NMR (125 MHz, D2O,
ꢂ ¼ TMS); ꢂ 99.01, 102.19, 102.41, 102.45, 102.52, 102.62, 102.65
(anomeric positions); ESI-HRMS: [M+NH4]þ calculated for
20
C
43H78NO36, 1184.4304; found 1184.4308; ½ꢁꢁ
¼ À3:98 ꢀ (c 1.0,
D
H2O); FT-IR (KBr): 764, 1033, 3410 cmÀ1
.
Scheme 3. One-pot synthesis of heptasaccharide 11.