Tian et al.
(Bucherer reaction)13 and the acid-catalyzed transforma-
tion of tetralone oximes (Semmler-Wolff reaction).14 Very
specific aminonaphthalene systems, such as substituted
o-aminonaphthols, 2-cyano-1-aminonaphthalenes, and
others, have been prepared with various success by a
variety of aminobenzannulation approaches.15 To the best
of our knowledge, there is no general and efficient
methodology for the synthesis of aminonaphthalenes by
alkyne annulation. Yet, such an approach could be
extremely valuable, as it would allow for rapid construc-
tion of a fairly complex functionalized cyclic system from
two independent components.
Recently, useful palladium-alkyne annulation meth-
odology has been developed in this group, which offers
convenient routes to various carbo- and heterocyclic
compounds.16 These reactions involve the insertion of an
internal alkyne into an arylpalladium intermediate and
subsequent cyclization onto a functional group present
in the ortho position. In continuation of our work, we
have investigated the possibility that a cyanomethyl
group might serve as the neighboring functional group
and that the vinylpalladium intermediate might add
across the carbon-nitrogen triple bond to produce 2-ami-
nonaphthalenes (eq 1). Here, we wish to report full
details of our work on developing the Pd-catalyzed alkyne
annulation of internal alkynes by (2-iodophenyl)acetoni-
trile into general methodology for the synthesis of 3,4-
disubstituted 2-aminonaphthalenes.17,18
to GC-MS analysis, the reaction was complete after 48 h
and higher yields were observed (entries 3 and 4). Other
palladium catalysts, such as Pd(dba)2 and Pd(PPh3)4, did
not afford good yields (entries 5-7). Pd(OAc)2 appears
to be the best catalyst. Somewhat surprising was the
observation that 5 mol % Pd(OAc)2 is as effective as 20
mol % of the catalyst (compare entries 1 and 2, 3 and 4).
The next variable examined was the solvent (entries
8-12). The use of dimethylformamide (DMF) as the
solvent is crucial to the success of this reaction (entry
3). The reaction was also carried out in 9:1 DMF/H2O,
although the yield was considerably lower (entry 8).
Other solvents, including dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO),
MeNO2, dimethylacetamide (DMA), and MeCN were
inefficient, and none of the desired product was observed
(entries 9-12). The failure of DMA is particularly strik-
ing, since it usually behaves very similar to DMF as one
might expect with such similar structures.
The next task was to find the best base for the reaction.
A series of inorganic bases were examined first (entries
3 and 13-18), and NaOAc was observed to furnish the
highest yield (entry 3). After careful consideration of the
possible mechanism of the annulation (vide infra), we
realized that a hydrogen source is required for the
reaction. With this in mind, NaH and HCOONa were
examined as bases (entries 17 and 18). However, neither
reaction afforded the desired product. It is known that
tertiary amines containing an R-hydrogen can provide a
hydride to palladium through insertion of the palladium
into the C-H bond adjacent to nitrogen.19 Therefore,
Et3N was examined in the reaction, and the yield of
annulation product was significantly improved (entry 19).
It was also noticed that employing n-Bu4NCl as the
chloride source afforded better yields than LiCl (compare
entries 3 and 20, 19 and 21). Another tertiary amine,
i-Pr2NEt, was also examined in the reaction, and a high
yield was obtained (entry 22). However, the correspond-
ing secondary amines did not furnish good yields (entries
23 and 24). We also confirmed again that a reaction time
of 48 h is enough for the reaction, since no improvement
in yield was observed after 48 h (compare entries 21, 25,
and 26).
Resu lts a n d Discu ssion
We chose the reaction of diphenylacetylene and (2-
iodophenyl)acetonitrile as a model system for our initial
investigation (eq 1; R1, R2 ) Ph). First of all, the standard
reaction conditions used in much of our previous pal-
ladium annulation chemistry16 were employed in the
reaction. As hoped for, the carbon-nitrogen triple bond
of the cyano group participated in the reaction and
2-amino-3,4-diphenylnaphthalene was obtained in a 34%
yield (Table 1, entry 1).
Since the yield of the reaction was low, considerable
effort has been carried out to optimize the reaction
conditions so as to improve the yields. First, different
reaction times and palladium catalysts were examined
in the reaction (Table 1, entries 1-7). Using Pd(OAc)2,
GC-MS analysis indicated that the reaction had not
reached completion even after 11 h (entries 1 and 2).
Thus, longer reaction times were employed. According
In a continued effort to optimize the reaction condi-
tions, the effects of phosphines and Lewis acids were
explored (entries 27-32). It was observed that the
addition of the Lewis acids Zn(OAc)2 and ZnCl2 only made
the reaction worse (compare entries 27-29). The addition
of catalytic amounts of phosphines, such as PPh3, P(o-
tolyl)3, and tris(2,6-dimethoxyphenyl)phosphine, did not
improve the yield, and longer reaction times were re-
quired for the reaction to reach completion (entries 30-
32).
Having established the optimal solvent, reaction time,
catalyst, and base, we turned our attention toward the
amount of the base Et3N. Varying amounts of Et3N, from
1 to 5 molar equiv, were examined (entries 21 and 33-
35). The results indicate that 2 equiv of Et3N afforded
the best yield of naphthylamine (entry 34).
(13) (a) Drake, N. L. Org. React. 1942, 1, 105. (b) Seeboth, H. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1967, 6, 307. (c) Canete, A.; Melendrez, M. X.;
Saitz, C.; Zanocco, A. L. Synth. Commun. 2001, 31, 2143.
(14) Newman, M. S.; Hung, W. M. J . Org. Chem. 1973, 38, 4073.
(15) (a) Sommer, M. B.; Begtrup, M.; Boegesoe, K. P. J . Org. Chem.
1990, 55, 4822. (b) Herndon, J . W.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, K. J . Organomet.
Chem. 2001, 634, 1. (c) Grotjahn, D. B.; Kroll, F. E. K.; Schaefer, T.;
Harms, K.; Do¨tz, K. K. Organometallics 1992, 11, 298. (d) Merlic, C.
A.; Xu, D.; Gladstone, B. G. J . Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 538.
(16) (a) Larock, R. C. J . Organomet. Chem. 1999, 576, 111. (b)
Larock, R. C. Pure Appl. Chem. 1999, 71, 1435.
(19) For mechanistic discussion of this process, see: (a) McCrindle,
R.; Ferguson, G.; Arsenault, G. J .; McAlees, A. J . J . Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1983, 571, and references therein. (b) Trzeciak, A. M.;
Ciunik, Z.; Ziolkowski, J . J . Organometallics 2002, 21, 132. (c)
Murahashi, S.-I.; Hirano, T.; Yano, T. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100,
348. (d) Pletnev, A. A.; Tian, Q.; Larock, R. C. J . Org. Chem. 2002, 67,
9276-9287.
(17) For a preliminary communication, see: Larock, R. C.; Tian, Q.;
Pletnev, A. A. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 3238.
(18) See also: Pletnev, A. A.; Larock, R. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002,
43, 2133.
340 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 68, No. 2, 2003