Sato et al.
TABLE 1. r-Trifluoromethylation Using Silyl Enol Ethers of
Various Ketones
SCHEME 1. Zn-Mediated Rh-Catalyzed
r-Trifluoromethylation of Ketones
carbonyl compounds to afford trifluoromethylated carbinols.5,6
In additioin, a CF3 radical derived from CF3-I with SmI2 or
Et3B was added to olefins.7
Although there are a number of methods for introducing a
CF3 unit to an organic molecule as mentioned above, it is
difficult to introduce a CF3 group at the R-position of carbonyl
compounds. One of the most simple methods is the use of
electrophilic trifluoromethylating reagents such as trifluoro-
methyl chalcogenium salts,8 but their insolubility in most organic
solvents inhibits their common use in organic synthesis. Another
method is the use of radical trifluoromethylation protocols, but
this method leads to low yields and requires special equipment
or techniques in some cases.9-11
a Isolated yield. b Diastereomeric ratio was calculated from 19F NMR.
c
19F NMR yield calculated from benzotrifluoride (BTF). d Total yield of
diastereomeric mixture. e 3c was obtained in 15% as a by-product. f The
dimer (4d) was isolated in the yield as the diastereomeric mixture.
Recently, we have reported a Zn-mediated Rh-catalyzed
R-trifluoromethylation of ketones via silyl enol ethers (2)
(Scheme 1).12 This reaction proceeded smoothly and made it
possible to use the aromatic silyl enol ethers that could not be
used in Mikami’s procedure.13 However, the mechanism of this
effective R-trifluoromethylation of ketones was still unclear. This
fact drove to investigate the reaction mechanism. We report
herein the result of the mechanistic studies on the R-trifluo-
romethylation and the further application to other carbonyl
compounds.
TABLE 2. Examination about SET Mechanism
RhCl(PPh3)3
(mol %)
entry
additive
none
none
O2
amount
25 mL
time (h) yielda (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
2
none
none
0.5
24
3
1.5
18
81
16
45
79
42
84
76
2
2
2
2
galvinoxyl 4 mol %
galvinoxyl 1 equiv
Results and Discussion
Mechanistic Studies on r-Trifluoromethylation. In a previ-
ous report, we disclosed an R-trifluoromethylation of ketones
via silyl enol ethers (2) using Et2Zn in the presence of
RhCl(PPh3)3 (Table 1).12 Various R-CF3 ketones (3) for which
synthesizing was difficult came to be easily obtained by using
this method.
In this R-trifluoromethylation, we initially had assumed a
participation of the SET mechanism, since a dimer product (4d)
was obtained in an excellent yield on the R-trifluoromethylation
TEMPO
TEMPO
4 mol %
1 equiv
1.5
5
a
19F NMR yield calculated from benzotrifluoride (BTF).
of 1-phenyl-1-trimethylsiloxyethylene (2d) as shown in entry
4 of Table 1. In fact, Mikami’s procedure was a radical
R-trifluoromethylation of ketones by using Li, Ti, or Zn enolates
assisted Et3B/O2.13 Furthermore, Chen et al. also reported Pd(0)-
induced addition of Rf-X to alkenes via a SET mechanism.14
Thus, we tried to confirm the involvement of radical mechanism
using the 1-(trimethylsiloxy)cyclohexene (2a) as a substrate
(Table 2).
(7) (a) Lu, X.; Ma, S.; Zhu, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29, 5129–5130. (b)
Takeyama, Y.; Ichinose, Y.; Oshima, K.; Utimoto, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989,
30, 3159–3162. (c) Yajima, T.; Nagano, H.; Saito, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003,
44, 7027–7029.
(8) (a) Umemoto, T.; Ishihara, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 2156–2164.
(b) Umemoto, T. Chem. ReV. 1996, 96, 1757–1777. (c) Ma, J.-A.; Cahard, D. J.
Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 8726–8729.
(9) For the trifluoromethylation of silyl and germyl enolates of esters and
ketones, see: (a) Miura, K.; Taniguchi, M.; Nozaki, K.; Oshima, K.; Utimto, K.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 6391–6394. (b) Miura, K.; Takeyama, Y.; Oshima,
K.; Utimoto, K. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1991, 64, 1542–1553.
(10) For the trifluoromethylation of lithium enolate of imides, see: (a) Iseki,
K.; Nagai, T.; Kobayashi, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 2169–2170. (b) Iseki,
K.; Nagai, T.; Kobayashi, Y. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1994, 5, 961–974.
(11) For the trifluoromethylation of enamines, see: (a) Cantacuze`ne, D.;
Dorme, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1975, 25, 2031–2034. (b) Cantacuze`ne, D.;
Wakselman, C.; Dorme, R. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1977, 1365–1371.
(c) Kitazume, T.; Ishikawa, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 5186–5191. (d)
Semisch, C.; Margaretha, P. J. Fluorine Chem. 1986, 30, 471–475.
(12) Sato, K.; Yuki, T.; Tarui, A.; Omote, M.; Kumadaki, I.; Ando, A.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 3558–3561.
(13) (a) Itoh, Y.; Mikami, K. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 649–651. (b) Itoh, Y.;
Mikami, K. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 4883–4885. (c) Itoh, Y.; Mikami, K. Tetrahedron
2006, 62, 7199–7203. (d) Mikami, K.; Tomita, Y.; Ichikawa, Y.; Amikura, K.;
Itoh, Y. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 4671–4673. (e) Itoh, Y.; Houk, K. N.; Mikami, K.
J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 8918–8925.
Although the yield was very low and a long reaction time
was needed, this reaction gave 3a even in the absence of the
Rh catalyst (entry 2). Since a dialkylzinc such as Et2Zn is
generally not a good radical source, the need to add an additive
such as O2 has been recognized for the generation of alkyl
radical,15 and the yield of 3a also improved slightly as expected
(entry 3). However, although these results suggested the
participation of the SET mechanism, the addition of a catalytic
amount of radical scavengers such as galvinoxyl or TEMPO to
(14) Chen, Q.-Y.; Yang, Z.-Y.; Zhao, C.-X.; Qiu, Z.-M. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1988, 563–567.
(15) (a) Ryu, I.; Araki, F.; Minakata, S.; Komatsu, M. Tetrahedron Lett.
1998, 39, 6335–6336. (b) Bertrand, M. P.; Feray, L.; Nouguier, R.; Perfetti, P.
J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 9189–9193. (c) Bertrand, M. P.; Coantic, S.; Feray, L.;
Nouguier, R.; Perfetti, P. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 3951–3961. (d) Yamada, K.;
Fujihara, H.; Yamamoto, Y.; Miwa, Y.; Taga, T.; Tomioka, K. Org. Lett. 2002,
4, 3509–3511.
3816 J. Org. Chem. Vol. 74, No. 10, 2009