64
M.B. Abdul Rahman et al. / Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic 79 (2012) 61–65
dramatic improvements in its activity and enantioselectivity for
the esterification of 2-arylpropionic acid derivatives in an organic
solvent system. It is assumed that the coating procedure might be
essential for the activation and conformation of lipases by ILs.
In an ionic liquid-coated enzyme, the ILs may play an impor-
tant role in stabilizing the CRL in the organic solvent reaction. In
this context, the enzyme CRL was able to enhance its performance
without losing significant activity when it was coated with ILs and
the IL-coated CRL form had satisfactory stability. It was also found
that both IL1-CRL and IL2-CRL did not aggregate and that the coat
was stable and remained on the enzyme’s surface during the reac-
tion. It was hypothesized that the hydrophilic character of these
two new amino acids ILs, especially the anions may interact with
bonds between the amino acids’ anions and the essential water
layer on the enzyme’s surface.
As mentioned previously, two different types of new ILs-CRL
were screened for their ability in the esterification of fatty acids
esters. Evaluation of their activity was based on the conversion of
esters. As shown in Fig. 3, high catalytic activity was obtained for
IL1-CRL if compared to IL2-CRL. This might be due to the confor-
mational structure of ILs used, as shown previously in Fig. 1. The
higher conversion rate of fatty acids esters produced in the pres-
ence of IL1-CRL is possibly due to the effect of the imidazole ring
in the side chain of l-histidine. As reported by Jarvo [45], both the
carboxylate and the secondary amine in the structure of l-histidine
were found to be essential for catalysis, which may be the reason
for the higher conversion rate of esters with IL1-CRL.
4. Conclusion
Another modifier used with enzyme is polyethylene glycol (PEG)
as reported by Nakashima et al. [10] and Yamasaki et al. [40].
Although PEG-modified enzymes have shown many advantages
such as the increased solubility, activity and stability when used in
organic solvents compared to the native enzymes, some disadvan-
tages still exist. As PEG is very hydrophilic, PEG-modified enzymes
have a strong hydrophilicity and high capacity of adsorbing water,
especially the water layer around enzyme’s surface. Besides, the
hydrophilic nature of PEG may adversely affect the solubility
and thermostability of the modified enzymes in organic solvents.
However, in case of ILs-CRL it was found that tetraethylammonium-
based amino acids ILs used as modifier do not showed strong
hydrophilic character as compared to PEG and also did not affect
the solubility of catalyst especially in hexane. From the results
obtained, it was assumed that the nature of hydrophilic charac-
ter of ILs used was said to be appropriate in order to maintain the
the interaction between ILs and surface of enzyme as discussed
above.
In different opinion based on hydrophobicity, Okahata and Mori
[41] observed similar intermolecular hydrogen bonds between the
lipid and enzyme in their lipid-coated enzyme. The presence of
hydrogen bonds with polar and non-polar regions may be respon-
sible for the stability of enzymes coated in ILs that can maintain
both the solvophobic interactions are essential for maintaining
the native structure. The protein’s water shell is preserved by the
“inclusion” of the aqueous solution of free enzyme into the ILs net-
work, resulting in a clear enhancement of the enzyme’s stability
[42]. This is only a preliminary suggestion on how the enzyme and
the ILs bond during coating and further research in characteriz-
ing its physico-chemical properties and molecular modeling are
planned.
In conclusion, it was found that amino acids ILs-coated CRL
system as new biocatalyst caused remarkable catalytic activity of
lipase-catalyzed esterification of long chain fatty acid esters. In par-
ticular, the l-histidine-based served as an excellent partner with
CRL. Both ILs-coated CRL catalysts may be suitable for biotrans-
formation and biotechnology fields and provide new aspects in
theoretical and application of ILs in enzymatic reactions.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful for the financial support from the Genetics and
Molecular Biology Initiative and Universiti Putra Malaysia.
References
[1] B. Joseph, P.W. Ramteke, G. Thomas, Biotechnol. Adv. 26 (2008) 457–470.
[2] M.A. Klibanov, Trends Biotechnol. 15 (1997) 97–101.
[3] A.A. Mendes, H.F.De. Castro, S.D.De. Rodrigues, W.S. Adriano, P.W. Tardioli, E.J.
Mammarella, R.De.C. Giordano, R.De.L.C. Giordano, J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol.
38 (2011) 1055–1066.
[4] K. Solanki, M.N.A. Gupta, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 21 (2011) 2934–2936.
[5] J. Forde, A. Vakurov, T.D. Gibson, P. Millner, M. Whelehan, I.W. Marison, C.
Ó’Fágáin, J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym. 66 (2010) 203–209.
[6] M.B. Abdul Rahman, U.H. Zaidan, M. Basri, M.Z. Hussein, R.N.Z.R. Abdul Rahman,
A.B. Salleh, J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym. 50 (2008) 33–39.
[7] U.H. Zaidan, M.B. Abdul Rahman, M. Basri, S.S. Othman, R.N.Z.R. Abdul Rahman,
A.B. Salleh, Appl. Clay Sci. 47 (2010) 276–282.
[8] N. Mileti, K. Loos, Aust. J. Chem. 62 (2009) 799–805.
[9] D.H. Lee, C.H. Park, J.M. Yeo, S.W. Kim, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 12 (2006) 777–782.
[10] K. Nakashima, J. Okada, T. Maruyama, N. Kamiya, M. Goto, Sci. Technol. Adv.
Mater. 7 (2006) 692–698.
[11] C.A. Godoy, B. de las Rivas, M. Filice, G. Fernández-Lorente, J.M. Guisan, J.M.
Palomo, Process Biochem. 45 (2010) 534–541.
[12] A. Thakar, D. Madamwar, Process Biochem. 40 (2005) 3263–3266.
[13] B.-D. Song, H. Ding, S.-C. Wang, Biotechnol. Bioproc. E 12 (2007) 121–124.
[14] J.-Y. Yan, Y.-J. Yan, J.-K. Yang, L. Xu, Y. Liu, Process Biochem. 44 (2009)
1128–1132.
[15] Y. Mine, K. Fukunaga, K.-I. Samejima, M. Yoshimoto, K. Nakao, Y. Sugimura, J.
Biosci. Bioeng. 96 (2003) 525–528.
[16] T. Itoh, Y. Abe, T. Hirakawa, N. Okano, S. Nakajima, S. Hayase, M. Kawatsura,
T. Matsuda, K. Nakamura, in: S.V. Malhotra (Ed.), Ionic Liquid Applications:
Pharmaceuticals, Therapeutics, and Biotechnology, Oxford University Press,
Washington, DC, 2010, pp. 155–167.
[17] Y. Abe, T. Hirakawa, S. Nakajima, N. Okano, S. Hayase, M. Kawatsura, Y. Hirose,
T. Itoh, Adv. Synth. Catal. 350 (2008) 1954–1958.
Higher conversion rates in the reaction catalyzed by ILs-coated
CRL may also be explained by the hydrophilic nature of the ILs.
Generally, hydrophobic salts are preferable in organic reactions.
However, it is assumed that the hydrophilic character of ILs is
important since the water formed in the reaction is used by the
[18] M.T. Ru, S.Y. Hirokane, A.S. Lo, J.S. Dordick, J.A. Reimer, S.S. Clark, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 122 (2000) 1565–1571.
Meanwhile, low activity of native CRL could be due to the effect
of high temperatures during the reaction. Lipase is easily denatured
at high temperatures [43] when the peptide bonds and amino acids
side chains become reactive and participate in deleterious reac-
tions [44]. This might be the reason why low conversion rates are
observed with native CRL in reactions at 50 ◦C. However, in both
ILs-CRL, the lipase’s active conformation is protected by ILs against
high temperatures, as both ILs [N2222][his] and [N2222][asn] were
thermally stable up to 170 ◦C [33].
[19] J.P. Lindsay, D.S. Clark, J.S. Dordick, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 85 (2004) 553–560.
[20] J.K. Lee, M.-J. Kim, J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym. 68 (2011) 275–278.
[21] Y. Polyakova, Y. Jin, J. Zheng, K. Ho Row, J. Liq. Chromatogr. R 29 (2006)
1687–1701.
[22] M. Tian, H. Yan, K.H. Row, Anal. Lett. 43 (2010) 110–118.
[23] F. Endres, S. Zein El Abedin, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 8 (2006) 2101–2116.
[24] J. Zhang, A.M. Bond, Analyst 130 (2005) 1132–1147.
[25] S. Sunitha, S. Kanjilal, P.S. Reddy, R.B.N. Prasad, Biotechnol. Lett. 29 (2007)
1881–1885.
[26] Y. Abe, K. Yoshiyama, Y. Yagi, S. Hayase, M. Kawatsura, T. Itoh, Green Chem. 12
(2010) 1976–1980.