Aurophilic Interactions in Cationic Gold Complexes
A R T I C L E S
In the γ polymorph the Au-Br distance is shorter yet (2.777(1)
Å) and the P-Au-P portion is further bent (147.5(1)°). In
contrast, although the colorless and yellow polymorphs of
[(C6H11NC)2AuI](PF6) show significant differences in the
environment of the gold ions, there is no bending of the
C-Au-C portion of the cation that occurs as a result of the
aurophilic attraction.
The structural variations seen in the polymorphs of [(C6H11-
NC)2AuI](PF6) and {(C6H11)3P}2AuBr are related to the concept
of bond stretch isomers: molecules that “differ only in the length
of one or several bonds”.27 Several examples of bond stretch
isomers have been identified,28 and theoretical analyses of the
phenomenon have been presented.29 With regard to the varia-
tions seen in the Au‚‚‚Au contacts in the yellow and colorless
polymorphs of [(C6H11NC)2AuI](PF6), these do not constitute
bond stretch isomers in the strict sense of the definition, since
the Au‚‚‚Au interactions do not exist within a molecule or
molecular ion but rather involve interionic interactions that do
not persist in dilute solution. Nevertheless, significant differences
must exist in the interionic interactions in the yellow and
colorless polymorphs.
Two colorless polymorphs of {(C6H5)3As}AuCl have been
reported.30 These differ in the torsional angles of the phenyl
groups and in molecular packing but do not have close Au‚‚‚
Au contacts. The shortest Au‚‚‚Au separations are 5.916(1) Å
for the needle modification or 6.913(1) Å for the prismatic
modification. Both forms are luminescent, but the spectra of
the two forms show only minor differences.31 The luminescence
arises from the triphenylarsine ligand π-π states not from the
metal centers.
Usually, the aurophilic interactions between monomeric, two-
coordinate gold(I) complexes lead to simple dimerization rather
than the formation of extended chains in which each gold center
interacts with two neighbors. However, in the solid state
{(Me2S)AuCl}n forms a bent chain structure with an Au‚‚‚Au
distance of 3.226(1) Å and an Au‚‚‚Au‚‚‚Au angle of 168.1
(1)°.32 Colorless {(2-picoline)AuCl}n forms a similar chain
with an Au‚‚‚Au distance of 3.1960(4) Å and an Au‚‚‚Au‚‚‚Au
angle of 165.079(12)°.33 These chains, which involve neutral
molecules, both have Au‚‚‚Au separations that are longer than
those in either the colorless or the yellow polymorphs of
[(C6H11NC)2AuI](PF6). In the salt (C12H14N2)[AuI2]2, the [AuI2]-
ions self-associate into extended chains along a crystallographic
42 screw axis with an Au‚‚‚Au distance of 3.3767(3) Å.34 As
noted above [Au{C(NHCH3)2}2](PF6) also forms linear columns
along a crystallographic screw axis with a separation of
(3.1882(1) Å).19 In [(3-picoline)2Au][AuCl2], where cations
and anions associate into zigzagged chains, the Au‚‚‚Au
separation is somewhat shorter, 3.1538(12) Å.31 Only in
[(tetrahydrothiophene)2Au][AuI2] are the Au‚‚‚Au distances
(2.967(2) and 2.980(2) Å)35 as short as those found in the yellow
polymorph of [(C6H11NC)2AuI](PF6).
The variation in Au‚‚‚Au interactions within these polymorphs
and within the general class of cations, [(isocyanide)2AuI]+, is
remarkable and reflects the generally weak nature of the
aurophilic attraction. A different but related form of aggregation
is seen in the crystalline forms of {Au(S2CN(C5H11)2}2.16 This
dimer crystallizes as an orange, luminescent form from dimethyl
sulfoxide. In this form, which is a solvate containing dimethyl
sulfoxide, the dimers (with an intramolecular Au‚‚‚Au distance
of 2.7690(7) Å) associate through further intermolecular Au‚‚
‚Au contacts with a separation of 2.9617(7) Å into extended
chains. In contrast, when crystallized from n-propanol/benzene
{Au(S2CN(C5H11)2}2 forms colorless, solvent-free crystals in
which the shortest intermolecular Au‚‚‚Au contact is over 8 Å
long.
Somewhat related phenomena occur in crystalline salts of the
anion [Pt(CN)4]2- which self-associates to form extended
columns with Pt‚‚‚Pt interactions. In numerous salts of this anion
in which different cations and varying amounts of water are
present, the Pt‚‚‚Pt separations cover the wide range from 3.09
to 3.71 Å.36 However, we are unaware of any examples of
polymorphism in [Pt(CN)4]2- salts. Polymorphism does occur
in platinum(II) polypyridine complexes where metal-metal
interactions and π-π stacking of the aromatic ligands influence
the absorption and luminescence of the complexes. For example,
(2,2′-bipyridine)PtIICl2 crystallizes in a yellow, monomeric
form37 and a red form which contains linear chains of platinum
ions with a spacing of 3.402(1) Å.38 Additionally, [(2,2′,6′,2:-
terpyridine)PtII(CtC-CtCH)](O3SCF3) forms a dark-green
polymorph with an extended chain structure with a Pt‚‚‚Pt
separation of 3.388 Å and a red form which consists of a chain
of dimers with an intradimer Pt‚‚‚Pt separation of 3.394 Å and
an interdimer Pt‚‚‚Pt separation of 3.648 Å.39
The luminescence obtained from [(C6H11NC)2AuI](PF6),
whether in the solid state, in the melt, or in frozen solutions,
results from the formation of aggregated species that self-
associate through aurophilic attractions. In solution, where the
ions are dispersed, [(C6H11NC)2AuI](PF6) is nonluminescent.
Additionally, crystalline [(CH3NC)2AuI](PF6) (which has no
aurophilic interactions) and its solutions are nonluminescent.
However, both crystalline forms of [(C6H11NC)2AuI](PF6),
which do show strong aurophilic interactions, are luminescent.
Moreover, as was the case with the [Au{C(NHMe)2}2]+ ion,
the luminescence is dependent upon the structure of the solid
state and the nature of the aurophilic interactions present therein.
Within the chains of gold atoms which are present in the
polymorphs of [(C6H11NC)2AuI](PF6), overlap of the occupied
(27) Parkin, G.; Hoffmann, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1994, 33, 1462.
(28) Parkin, G. Acc. Chem. Res. 1992, 25, 455. Cotton, F. A.; Daniels, L. M.;
Jordan, G. T. Chem. Commun. 1997, 421. McGrady, J. E. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3077. Cle´rac, R.; Cotton, F. A.; Daniels, L. M.; Dunbar,
K. R.; Murillo, C. A.; Wang, X. P. Inorg. Chem. 2001, 40, 1256.
(29) Stohrer, W.-D.; Hoffmann, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 779. Stohrer,
W.-D.; Hoffmann, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 1661. Jean, Y.; Lledos,
A.; Burdett, J. K.; Hoffmann, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 4506.
Rohmer, M.-M.; Be´nard, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 9372. Rohmer,
M.-M.; Be´nard, M. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2001, 30, 340
(30) Weissbart, B.; Larson, L. J.; Olmstead, M. M.; Nash, C. P.; Tinti, D. S.
Inorg. Chem. 1995, 34, 393.
(31) Larson, L. J.; McCauley, E. M.; Weissbart, B.; Tinti, D. S. J. Phys. Chem.
1995, 99, 7218.
2
gold 5dz orbitals (where z is the axis along the Au‚‚‚Au‚‚‚Au
chain) produces a filled band of orbitals, while overlap of the
empty gold 6pz orbitals produces a corresponding band of
(35) Ahrland, S.; Nore´n, B.; Oskarsson, A° . Inorg. Chem. 1985, 24, 1330.
(36) Williams, J. M.; Schultz, A. J.; Underhill, A. E.; Carnero, K. In Extended
Linear Chain Compounds; Miller, J. S., Ed.; Plenum Press: New York,
1982; Vol. 1, 73.
(37) Osborn, R. S.; Rogers, D. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1974, 1002.
(38) Bielli, E.; Gidney, P. M.; Gillard, R. D.; Heaton, B. T. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton
Trans. 1974, 2133. Connick, W. B.; Henling, L. M.; Marsh, R. E.; Gray,
H. B. Inorg. Chem. 1996, 35, 6261.
(39) Yam, V. W.-W.; Wong, K. M.-C.; Zhu, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124,
6506.
(32) Jones, P. G.; Lautner, J. Acta Crystallogr. 1988, C44, 2089.
(33) Jones, P. G.; Ahrens, B. Z. Naturforsch. B 1998, 53, 653.
(34) Tang, Z.; Litvinchuk, A. P.; Lee, H.-G.; Guloy, A. M. Inorg. Chem. 1998,
37, 4752.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 125, NO. 4, 2003 1039