the outcome of the cyclization reaction.7 Herein, we report
on the reaction of cyclic carbinol amides with triflic
anhydride as a method to prepare various R-trifluoromethyl-
sulfonamido furans, some of which can be further utilized
for cycloaddition chemistry.
Scheme 3
Recent work in our laboratory has shown that the reaction
of R-angelica lactone (5) with various alkylamines under
aqueous conditions afforded 5-hydroxy-5-methylpyrrolidi-
nones (6, 7) in high yield (Scheme 2).8 When 6 was treated
Scheme 2
furan also took place when trifluoroacetic anhydride was used
as the acylating agent. Both 16 and the related cyclic keto
amide 19 underwent smooth cyclization with TFAA to
furnish furans 18 and 20 in high yield. Attempts to remove
the trifluoroacetyl group of 20 under basic conditions with
K2CO3/MeOH resulted in an oxidative rearrangement giving
carbinol amide 21 in modest yield.
Recently, Charette and co-workers have demonstrated that
secondary and tertiary amides can be activated with triflic
anhydride to generate the corresponding iminium salts which
can react further with various nucleophiles.11 Iminium
triflates were originally used by Ghosez as precursors of
ketiminium cations which can function as electrophilic
substrates in [2+2]-cycloadditions.12 It would seem that when
a hydroxy pyrrolidinone such as 7 is used as the tertiary
amide, the resulting iminium ion (i.e., 22) derived from the
reaction of 7 with triflic anhydride undergoes a facile ring
opening as a consequence of the adjacent hydroxyl group to
produce imino triflate 23 (Scheme 4). Subsequent cyclization
of this highly electrophilic imine13 with the oxygen atom of
the adjacent carbonyl group results in the formation of imino
dihydrofuran 24. This transient species reacts further with
another equivalent of triflic anhydride to give the observed
furan. By using only 1 equiv of triflic anhydride and then
adding a second equivalent of acetyl chloride, acetylation
of 24 occurred in modest yield leading to the related N-acetyl
furan 25 (R ) CH2Ph).
with p-TsOH in benzene at 100 °C, dimer 8 was formed as
the major product. On the other hand, the reaction of 7 with
trifluoroacetic anhydride (TFAA) furnished enamide 9 in
79% yield, presumably by an elimination/acylation process.
The structure of 9 was unequivocally established by a single-
crystal X-ray analysis. The pathway suggested for the
formation of 9 was supported by the finding that the reaction
of 7 with acetic anhydride gave enamide 10 which, in turn,
was converted to 9 upon treatment with TFAA. Most
interestingly, when a sample of 7 was allowed to stir with 2
equiv of triflic anhydride9 and pyridine in CH2Cl2, R-trif-
luoromethyl-sulfonamido furan 11 was formed in 79% yield.
This reaction was quite general affording related sulfonamido
furans with a broad range of alkylamines (i.e., 12-15). The
same reaction occurred in good yield when cyclic carbinol
amides 2a-c were treated with triflic anhydride in CH2Cl2.
Cyclization to the sulfonamido furan also came about with
the isomeric γ-keto amide system 16,10 giving rise to furan
17 in excellent yield (Scheme 3). In fact, cyclization to the
The indoline nucleus is a key structural feature found in
a large number of alkaloids and related compounds, many
of which exhibit potent pharmacological activity.14 It is not
surprising that numerous routes have been devised over the
(11) Charette, A. B.; Chua, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 1997. Charette,
A. B.; Chua, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 8499. Charette, A. B.; Chua,
P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 245. Charette, A. B.; Chua, P. J. Org. Chem.
1998, 63, 908. Charette, A. B.; Chua, P. Synlett 1998, 163. Charette, A. B.;
Grenon, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 1677.
(7) Aoyagi, Y.; Williams, R. M. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 10419. Keum,
G.; Kim, G. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 1994, 15, 278. Martin, S. F.; Bur, S.
K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 7641.
(8) For some related work, see: Jones, J. B.; Young, J. M. Can. J. Chem.
1966, 44, 1059.
(9) For some reviews dealing with triflic anhydride, see: Ritter, K.
Synthesis 1993, 735. Stang, P. J.; Hanack, M.; Subramanian, L. R. Synthesis
1982, 85. Baraznenok, I. L.; Nenajdenko, V. G.; Balenkova, E. S.
Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 3077.
(12) Falmagne, J. B.; Escudero, J.; Taleb-Saharaoui, S.; Ghosez, L.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1981, 20, 879. Barbaro, G.; Battaglia, A.;
Bruno, C.; Giorgianni, P.; Guerrini, A. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 8480.
(13) Sisti, N. J.; Fowler, F. W.; Grierson, D. S. Synlett 1991, 816. Sisti,
N. J.; Zeller, E.; Grierson, D. S.; Fowler, F. W. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62,
2093. Thomas, E. W. Synthesis 1993, 767.
(10) Collado, M. I.; Manteca, I.; Sotomayor, N.; Villa, M. J.; Lete, E. J.
Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 2080.
(14) Szantay, C. Pure Appl. Chem. 1990, 62, 1299. Hibino, S.; Choshi,
T. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2002, 19, 148 and earlier reviews in the series.
190
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 2, 2003