being the chromium bis(imido) species [Cr(NtBu)2(CH2Ph)]+
alluded to above and characterised in situ.2 Apart from its
reactivity with ethylene, no other reactions of this species were
reported (other than the formation of Lewis base adducts).
room temperature to form the N,O-bound carbamate product of
imide cycloaddition [W(N2Npy){N(Ph)C(O)O}Me]+ 6+ and not
the alternative insertion product [W(N2Npy)(NPh)(O2Me)]+ 7+
(Scheme 1) or one of its isomers. Support for formulating the
CO2 reaction product as 6+ and not 7+ comes from 13C labelling
studies (of both the methyl group in 3+ and in the CO2): no
Treatment of 2 with half of an equivalent of BArF gives
3
solutions containing the binuclear methyl-bridged cation
[W2(N2Npy)2(NPh)2Me2(m-Me)]+ 5+ which can also be formed
by treating methyl cation 3+ with one equivalent of dimethyl 2.
13
13CH3U CO2 coupling is observed in doubly-labelled 6+, and
the magnitude of the 183WUMe coupling constant (1JWUMe = 92
Hz) is comparable to those in 2, 3+ and 4+. Reaction of 3+ with
phenyl isocyanate gives an analogous N,NA-bound ureate, imide
cycloaddition product [W(N2Npy){N(Ph)C(O)N(Ph)}Me]+ 8+
and, again, not insertion into the WUMe bond. Hydrolysis of 8+
afforded the expected derivative diphenylurea as one of the
products thus confirming the ureate ligand’s presence in 8+.
The reactions of [W(N2Npy)(NPh)Me]+ 3+ described above,
which give exclusively products of cycloaddition at the WNNPh
bond, appear to be governed by kinetic factors. Thus, DFT
Labelling
studies
(treatment
of
either
[W(N2Npy)(NPh)(13CH3)2] or [W(N2Npy)(NPh)(CD3)2] with
one equivalent of [W(N2Npy)(NPh)Me][MeBArF ] 3) show that
3
the methyl groups in 5+ all scramble (but not with the methyl of
the anion [MeBArF ]2). Treatment of 5+ with an equivalent of
3
BArF3 gave complete conversion to [W(N2Npy)(NPh)Me]+. The
formation of a bridging methyl cation like 5+ is precedented for
main group, actinide and early transition metals.6 Interestingly,
[W(N2Npy)(NPh)Me]+ also undergoes intermolecular methyl
group exchange with ZnMe2 on the NMR timescale (confirmed
by a spin saturation transfer NMR experiment), and also slowly
with [Cp2ZrMe2] (as established by deuterium labelling experi-
ments with [W(N2Npy)(NPh)CD3]+ or [Cp2Zr(CD3)2]) pre-
sumably through methyl bridged intermediates analogous to 5+.
In these regards, therefore, the imidotungsten methyl species 3+
has ‘normal’ alkyl cation behaviour and hence was a good
candidate to compare its reactivity towards substrates that might
react at either the WUMe or the WNNPh bond.
(B3PW91)
calculations†
of
model
systems
for
[W(N2Npy){N(Ph)C(O)O}Me]+ 6+ and [W(N2Npy)(N-
Ph)(O2Me)]+ 7+ have shown that the WUC insertion product 7+
is in fact actually 50.6 kcal mol21 more stable than the observed
WNN cycloaddition product 6+. Detailed experimental and
computational studies of the reactions and products of
[W(N2Npy)(NPh)Me]+ 3+ and related compounds with a
number of unsaturated organic substrates are currently under-
way to identify the underlying mechanistic and other factors
governing the reactions of imido alkyl complexes. The question
of at which point ancillary imido ligands become reactive
ligands in chemical transformations will have clear implications
for the use of imido-based species in catalytic and stoichio-
metric chemistry.
Unfortunately [W(N2Npy)(NPh)Me]+ 3+ does not react at all
with ethylene so we could not make comparisons with the
computational predictions concerning the [Cr(NRA)2R]+ sys-
tems. However, insertion reactions of tungsten alkyl com-
pounds with CO2 (to form O-bound acetate derivatives) have
been carefully studied in detail;7 moreover, we ourselves8a,b
have recently been exploring the still quite rare CO2 activation
reactions of transition metal imides,8 which have not before
been identified in Group 6 imido chemistry at all. Reaction of 3+
with CO2 (Scheme 1) proceeds rapidly and quantitatively at
We thank the EPSRC and Royal Society (PM), British
Council (PM and LHG), the CNRS (LHG and EC), the Institut
Universitaire de France (LHG) and the Université de Mon-
tpellier 2 (EC) for support and Professor O. Eisenstein for
helpful discussions.
Notes and references
1 For recent reviews and leading references see: (a) W. A. Nugent and J. M.
Mayer, Metal-Ligand Multiple Bonds, Wiley-Interscience, New York,
1988; (b) D. E. Wigley, Prog. Inorg. Chem., 1994, 42, 239; (c) P. R.
Sharp, Dalton Trans., 2000, 2647; (d) R. R. Schrock, Acc. Chem. Res.,
1990, 23, 158; (e) V. C. Gibson, Adv. Materials, 1994, 6, 37; (f) Special
Theme Issue BOrganometallic Chemistry with N and O p-donor ligandsB,
J. Organomet. Chem., Guest Editor P. Mountford, 1999, 591, pp.
2U213.
2 M. P. Coles, C. I. Dalby, V. C. Gibson, I. R. Little, E. L. Marshall, M. H.
Ribeiro da Costa and S. Mastroianni, J. Organomet. Chem., 1999, 591,
78.
3 V. R. Jensen and K. J. Børve, Chem. Commun., 2002, 543; V. R. Jensen
and K. J. Børve, Organometallics, 2001, 20, 616.
4 (a) L. H. Gade and P. Mountford, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2001, 216-217, 65;
(b) S. Friedrich, M. Schubart, L. H. Gade, I. J. Scowen, A. J. Edwards and
M. McPartlin, Chem. Ber.-Recueil, 1997, 130, 1751; (c) L. H. Gade,
Chem. Commun., 2000, 173.
5 A. D. Horton, Organometallics, 1996, 15, 2675; B. E. Bosch, G. Erker,
R. Fröhlich and O. Meyer, Organometallics, 1997, 16, 5449.
6 Binuclear cations with bridging methyl groups: S. Zhang and W. E. Piers,
Organometallics, 2001, 20, 2088; P. G. Hayes, W. E. Piers and R.
McDonald, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 2132; M. Bochmann and S. J.
Lancaster, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1994, 33, 1634; X. Yang, C. L.
Stern and T. J. Marks, Organometallics, 1991, 10, 840; M. P. Coles and
R. F. Jordan, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119, 8125.
7 M. M. Holl, G. L. Hillhouse, K. Folting and J. C. Huffman,
Organometallics, 1987, 6, 1522; D. J. Darensbourg, R. Kudaroski
Hanckel, C. G. Bauch, M. Pala, D. Simmons and J. N. White, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1985, 107, 7463; P. Kundel and H. Berke, J. Organomet.
Chem., 1988, 339, 297.
8 (a) A. E. Guiducci, A. R. Cowley, M. E. G. Skinner and P. Mountford, J.
Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 2001, 1392; (b) A. J. Blake, J. M. McInnes,
P. Mountford, G. I. Nikonov, D. Swallow and D. J. Watkin, J. Chem.
Soc., Dalton Trans., 1999, 379; (c) R. E. Blake, D. M. Antonelli, L. M.
Henling, W. P. Schaefer, K. I. Hardcastle and J. E. Bercaw, Organome-
tallics, 1998, 17, 718; (d) D. S. Glueck, J. Wu, F. J. Hollander and R. G.
Bergman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1991, 113, 2041.
Scheme 1 Synthesis and reactions of [W(N2Npy)(NPh)Me]+ 3+ (anion =
[MeBArF3]2).
CHEM. COMMUN., 2002, 2618–2619
2619