Table 1 Carbohydrate–amino acid coupling reactions
highly regioselective protease-catalyzed transesterification
process. The yields for this selective carbohydrate–peptide
conjugation of 23–76%, compare well with overall yields of
< 34% for alternative routes employing protection–deprotec-
tion strategies.7 The glycopeptides formed are powerful build-
ing blocks that will allow sugar reducing end (e.g. 17–20b) or
peptide N-terminal (e.g. 21) extension. In addition, we have
probed the substrate specificity of the proteases SBL and TL-
CLEC in this reaction using the novel vinyl esters 1–8c and this
has indicated a strong preference for phenylalanine but
flexibility in the N-protection that may be used. Furthermore,
we have successfully exploited striking differences in the rate of
reaction of carbohydrate acyl acceptors in this system to
perform exclusively mannose over N-acetylglucosamine se-
lective one-pot acylations. We have recently reported greatly
broadened substrate amino acid ester specificities for glycosy-
lated variants of SBL22 and we are currently exploring
transesterifications catalyzed by these glyco-SBLs with 4–8c
and other donors the results of which will be reported in due
course.
Coupling
pair
Yield of
R1
R2
R3
R4
R5
6-O-acyl (%)c
9a–1ca
OH
OH
OH
OH
H
H
OH
H
H
H
H
OH
H
H
OH
H
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
H
OH
H
OH
H
OH
H
H
H
H
OH
H
H
OH
H
24 9b
10a–1ca
11a–1ca
12a–1ca
13a–1ca
14a–1ca
15a–1ca
16a–1ca
17a–1ca
18a–1ca
19a–1ca
20a–1ca
16a–1cb
16a–2ca
16a–2cd
16a–3cd
24 10b
49 11b
NHAc OH
—
a-OMe
b-OMe
b-OMe
a-OMe
b-SPh
b-SPh
a-SPh
b-SePh
a-OMe
a-OMe
a-OMe
a-OMe
OH
OH
OH
H
OH
OH
H
OH
OH
H
OH
OH
H
25 13b
28 14b
30 15b
76 16b
44 17b + 29 17ce
36 18b
OH
62 19b
NHAc OH
H
H
H
H
23 20b
H
H
H
H
OH
OH
OH
OH
48 16b
32 16c
63 16c + 17 16de
60 16e
H
a 2 mg ml21 of lyophilized (from pH 8.0, 0.1 M phosphate) SBL
preparation, 45 °C, anhydrous pyridine, 120 h. b 1 mg ml21 of TL-CLEC,
45 °C, 1+25 water–pyridine. c All yields are for isolated, purified, single
compounds. d As for footnote a but for 500 h. e Yield of 3-O-acyl.
We thank the BBSRC for generous funding, Genencor
International for SBL, and Altus for TL-CLEC. We thank the
EPSRC for access to the Mass Spectrometry Service at Swansea
and the Chemical Database Service at Daresbury.
Next we investigated the effect of varying the amino acid acyl
donor. Disappointingly, but consistent with the observed low
affinity of SBL for other amino acid esters,19 none of the
aspartate or glutamate acyl donors were accepted as substrates.
In all cases only vinyl esters 4–8c were recovered indicating an
absence of acyl–enzyme intermediate formation. This con-
trasted with the reactions of 1c from which only transesterifica-
tion or hydrolysis products were recovered. In order to further
assess the utility of 1, 4–8c as acyl donor probes, we also
screened their reactivity with CLEC-thermolysin (TL-CLEC)20
as a protease with a different substrate specificity profile, that
includes b-aspartate esters.21 However, TL-CLEC also failed to
accept 4–8c and again only 1c was accepted, allowing the
preparation of 16b from 16a in 48% yield.
Notes and references
1 B. G. Davis, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1999, 3215.
2 C. M. Taylor, Tetrahedron, 1998, 54, 11 317.
3 A. Varki, Glycobiology, 1993, 3, 97; R. A. Dwek, Chem. Rev., 1996, 96,
683.
4 G. F. Springer, J. Mol. Med., 1997, 75, 594.
5 T. Tsuda and S.-I. Nishimura, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1996,
2779.
6 O. Seitz, Chem. Bio. Chem., 2000, 1, 215; M. Meldal and P. M. St
Hilaire, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 1997, 1, 552.
7 R. J. Tennant-Eyles and A. J. Fairbanks, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry,
1999, 10, 391 and references therein.
8 N. B. Bashir, S. J. Phythian, A. J. Reason and S. M. Roberts, J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans 1, 1995, 2203.
9 S. Riva, J. Chopineau, A. P. G. Kieboom and A. M. Klibanov, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1988, 110, 584; Y.-F. Wang, K. Yakovlevsky, B. Zhang
and A. L. Margolin, J. Org. Chem., 1997, 62, 3488.
10 S. Horvat, J. Horvat, L. Vargadefterdarovic, K. Pavelic, N. N. Chung
and P. W. Schiller, Intl. J. Pept. Prot. Res., 1993, 41, 399.
11 R. D. Egleton, S. A. Mitchell, J. D. Huber, J. Janders, D. Stropova, R.
Polt, H. I. Yamamura, V. J. Hruby and T. P. Davis, Brain Res., 2000,
881, 37.
12 M. Dickman, R. C. Lloyd and J. B. Jones, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry,
1998, 9, 4099; M. Dickman, R. C. Lloyd and J. B. Jones, Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry, 1998, 9, 551.
13 M. Lobell and M. P. Schneider, Synthesis, 1994, 375.
14 Y.-F. Wang, J. J. Lalonde, M. Momongan, D. E. Bergbreiter and C.-H.
Wong, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1988, 110, 7200. N-Protected vinyl ester
amino acids have been used previously as non-enzymatic acyl donors
with amines for peptide synthesis: F. Weygand and W. Steglich, Angew.
Chem., 1961, 73, 757. In all cases, 1–8c showed no non-enyzmatic
reaction with 9–20a.
Next, the effect of N-protection in the acyl donor was
investigated using Boc- and Z-protected phenylalanine donors
2, 3c, respectively. For 2c much lower rates of reaction were
observed than for 1c and after a comparable period of time
lower yields (32%) for the esterification of 16a were obtained.
However, extended reaction times gratifyingly allowed the
preparation of 6-O-phenylalaninates 16c, e from 2, 3c in 63 and
60% yields, respectively. The utility of 16c, e as glycopeptide
building blocks was confirmed through their quantitative N-
deprotection to methyl 6-O-phenylalaninyl-a- -mannopyrano-
D
side 21, which may be extended at its N-terminus.
Finally, the valuable specificity information obtained in these
screens was exploited to allow selective one-pot couplings. We
were delighted to find that different carbohydrate acyl acceptors
successfully competed in one-pot reactions to allow carbohy-
drate-selective esterification. Thus, in 1+1 mixtures of 12a +
16a and 19a + 20a (Scheme 3) mannosides reacted over N-
acetylglucosaminides with 1c in SBL-catalyzed acylations to
yield mannoside esters 16, 19b exclusively. In both reactions no
trace of 12b or 20b, respectively, was detected during this
highly selective process.
15 Regiochemistry of O-X-esterification products confirmed by 1H, 13C
NMR e.g. 18a 1H NMR (CD3OD) d 3.62 (H-6), 3.66 (H-6A); 13C NMR
(CD3OD) d 62.6 (C-6) ? 18b 1H NMR (CD3OD) d 4.23 (H-6), 4.32 (H-
6A); 13C NMR (CD3OD) d 65.9 (C-6) and/or HMBC, HSQC; OH–H d6-
DMSO COSY; OH acylation.
16 B. G. Davis, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 2000, 2137.
17 S. J. Chung, S. Takayama and C.-H. Wong, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.,
1998, 8, 3359.
In summary, we have described a ready method for the
construction of glycan–peptide conjugates by exploiting a
18 At the helpful suggestion of a referee, the question of whether 17c is a
direct or indirect, rearranged acylation product was investigated.
Compound 17b, under standard reaction conditions but in the absence of
donor 1c, did not yield 17c.
19 K. Khumtaveeporn, G. DeSantis and J. B. Jones, Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry, 1999, 10, 2563.
20 CLECs are cross-linked enzyme crystals.
21 M. Miyanaga, M. Ohmori, K. Imamura, T. Sakiyama and K. Nakanishi,
J. Biosci. Bioeng., 2000, 90, 43.
22 K. Matsumoto, B. G. Davis and J. B. Jones, Chem. Commun., 2001,
903.
Scheme 3
Chem. Commun., 2001, 1908–1909
1909