182
M.C. Roma´n-Mart´ınez et al. / Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical 213 (2004) 177–182
are: 566, 583, 694 and 677 (calculated without considering
leaching) and the L/B ratio remains close to 2.
Acknowledgements
A comparison with literature on supported systems re-
veals that the catalytic performance of the catalysts studied
in this work is similar or better than that shown in previously
using Rh-complexed dendrimers also obtained for the hy-
droformylation of octene a L/B = 2 ratio, but the total con-
version (of 2 mmol substrate) is achieved after 22 h. Nozaki
et al. [11] reported the behaviour of polymer immobilized
formylation of styrene and they found an interesting conver-
sion in the first run (about 80%), but it is strongly reduced in
the second one. Besides the L/B ratio is <1. More recently,
Wrzyszcz et al. [16] prepared Rh complexes supported on a
zinc aluminate spinel and found in the hydroformylation of
1-hexene a high conversion to aldehydes (96%) with L/R =
3. No leaching was detected although the catalysts were not
tested in a second run. Finally, Fierro et al. [15a] in their
work using Rh thiolate complexes anchored on phosphi-
nated silica for the hydroformylation of 1-heptene, obtain a
100% conversion (TO (as defined above) of about 300) and
a regioselectivity higher than 60% with L/B close to 2.5.
Furthermore, the catalysts do show activity after seven con-
secutive cycles. This brief revision on the behaviour of sup-
ported Rh complexes for olefine hydroformylation allows to
state that the results of the present work show a promising
perspective for the use of carbon materials as support for
the anchorage of metal complexes.
The authors thank project PPQ2002-01025 of the Spanish
Ministry of Science and Technology for financial support,
and J.A.D.A. thanks the same organism for the Ph.D. grant.
References
[1] V.A. Likholobov, B.L. Moroz, in: G. Ertl, H. Knözinger, J. Weitkamp
(Eds.), Handbook of Heterogeneous Catalysis, vol. 5, Wiley-VCH
Verlag, Weinheim, Germany, 1997, p. 2231.
[2] M. Lenarda, L. Storaro, R. Ganzerla, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 111
(1996) 203.
[3] E. Lindner, T. Schneller, F. Auer, H.A. Mayer, Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. 38 (1999) 2154.
[4] B. Cornils, W.A. Herrmann, R.W. Eckl, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 116
(1997) 27.
[5] J.P. Arhancet, M.E. Davis, J.S. Merola, B. Hanson, Nature 339 (1989)
454.
[6] M.T. Reetz, G. Lohmer, R. Schwickardi, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
Engl. 36 (1997) 1526.
[7] A.N. Ajjou, H. Alper, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120 (1998) 1466.
[8] K.K. Bando, K. Asakura, H. Arakawa, K. Isobe, Y. Iwasawa, J. Phys.
Chem. 100 (1996) 13636.
[9] V.L.K. Valli, H. Alper, Chem. Mater. 7 (1995) 359.
[10] Y. Zhang, H.-B. Zhang, G.-D. Lin, P. Chen, Y.-Z. Yuan, K.R. Tsai,
Appl. Catal. A 187 (1999) 213.
[11] K. Nozaki, F. Shibahara, Y. Itoi, E. Shirakawa, T. Ohta, H. Takaya,
T. Hiyama, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 72 (1999) 1911.
[12] J. Balúe, J.C. Bayón, J. Mol. Catal. A 137 (1999) 193.
[13] J.A. D´ıaz-Auñón, M.C. Román-Mart´ınez, C. Salinas-Mart´ınez de
Lecea, J. Mol. Catal. A 170 (2001) 81.
[14] J.A. D´ıaz Auñón, M.C. Román Mart´ınez, P. L’Argentiére, C. Salinas
Mart´ınez de Lecea, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 130 (2000) 2075.
[15] (a) J.L.G. Fierro, M.D. Merchán, S. Rojas, P. Terreros, J. Mol. Catal.
A 166 (2001) 255;
4. Conclusions
(b) S. Rojas, P. Terreros, J.L.G. Fierro, J. Mol. Catal. A 184 (2002)
19.
[16] J. Wrzyszcz, M. Zawadzki, A.M. Trzeciak, J.J. Ziólokowski, J. Mol.
Catal. A: Chem. 189 (2002) 203.
[17] D.E. Bryant, M. Kilner, J. Mol. Catal. A 193 (2003) 83.
[18] S.C. Bourque, F. Maltais, W.J. Xiao, O. Tardiff, H. Alper, P. Arya,
L. Manzer, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121 (1999) 3035.
[19] C.M. Crudden, D. Allen, M.D. Mikoluk, J. Sun, Chem. Commun.
(2001) 1154.
[20] B. Pugin, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 107 (1996) 273.
[21] K.J. Stanger, J.W. Wiench, M. Pruski, R.J. Angelici, J. Mol. Catal.
A: Chem. 195 (2003) 63.
[22] A.R. Silva, M. Martins, M.M.M. Freitas, A. Valente, C. Freiere,
B. de Castro, J.L. Figueiredo, Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 55
(2002) 275.
[23] M.C. Román Mart´ınez, D. Cazorla Amorós, L. Linares Solano, C.
Salinas Mart´ınez de Lecea, Carbon 31 (1993) 895.
[24] H.P. Boehm, High Temp. High Pressures 22 (1990) 275.
[25] D. Briggs, M.P. Seah (Eds.), Practical Surface Analysis, vol. 1, John
Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK, 1993.
A rhodium diphosphine complex was effectively an-
chored by covalent bonding on an activated carbon. The
complex is bound to the support via an esterification re-
action between a hydroxyl group in the ligand and the
acid-chloride-functionalised activated carbon surface. The
two synthetic routes developed for the heterogenisation (I:
ligand anchorage and then, complex synthesis and II: com-
plex synthesis followed by anchorage) give catalysts with
interesting catalytic properties, with the noteworthy feature
of being usable in consecutive catalytic cycles. However,
it must be pointed out that the anchoring procedure that
first synthesizes the Rh diphosphine catalyst (4) and then
bonds it to the carbon surface, is particularly attractive: the
resulting catalyst is fully active in four consecutive cat-
alytic cycles with a conversion to the linear aldehyde that
increases with reuse.