Angewandte
Communications
Chemie
isolated products, A only, P1–P3). These three vinylsiloxanes
also efficiently reacted with HSiMe(OTMS)2 to furnish the
desired products (P4–P6). Various alkoxy(vinyl)silanes such
as mono-, di-, or triethoxy(vinyl)silanes and their correspond-
ing methoxy variants could also be used, resulting in P7–P13
in 86–99% yield. Although trialkyl(vinyl)silanes are less
interesting hydrosilylation substrates in the silicon industry
than siloxy- or alkoxy(vinyl)silanes, to probe the scope of our
protocol, one substrate [triethyl(vinyl)silane] was tested
(91% yield, P14).
Scheme 5. Cross-linking of polymeric vinyl- and hydrosiloxanes.
Next, we examined the efficiency of Co-A in the hydro-
silylation of various siloxy- or alkoxy(vinyl)silanes with
alkoxy- or arylhydrosilanes. As shown in Scheme 4, hydro-
silylation of HSiMe2(OEt) with siloxy(vinyl)silanes (!P15,
used in the silicon industry (Scheme 5). In the presence of Co-
A, both linear (SFD-119, Dow Corning, Midland, MI) and Q-
branched vinyl polymers (2-7753) were efficiently cross-
linked with polymeric hydrosilane 2-7678; with 50 ppm of Co
concentration, cross-linking was accomplished in 3–5 min,
and with 100 ppm concentration, only 15 or 35 s were needed
for gelation. Even faster curing was observed with 200 ppm of
the catalyst (4 s for SFD-199, 20 s for 2-7753). The resulting
cured polymers are slightly yellow[13] compared to the gel
obtained by reaction with the Karstedt catalyst. This result
demonstrates that the current protocol is very comparable to
the one with Pt catalysts.
To get information on the initial catalyst species, Co-A
was treated with TMSCH2Li, followed by quenching by D2O,
which led to a deuterated compound (L6D, > 95% D
incorporation; Scheme 6). We also observed no hydrosilyla-
Scheme 4. Co-catalyzed anti-Markovnikov hydrosilylation of siloxy- or
alkoxy(vinyl)silanes with alkoxy- or arylhydrosilanes; yields determined
as described in Scheme 3. In the case of P19, the ratio A:redistribution
byproduct was 1.4:1, in the case of P20, more than three redistributed
hydrosilylation byproducts were observed.
Scheme 6. Deuterium experiment.
tion with a cobalt complex, prepared in situ from Co-A and
NaEt3BH (instead of TMSCH2Li).[14] These two results
tentatively suggest the formation of a tridentate cobalt
complex (Co-A’, Scheme 6). The formation of this structure
is indirectly supported by two previous reports.[12] For
example, a similar tridentate Hf complex was isolated from
L1 and HfCl4 in the presence of BuLi and MeMgBr.[12a]
Further experiments are required to clarify whether one
P16), triethyl(vinyl)silane (!P17), and mono-, di-, or
trialkoxy(vinyl)silanes (!P18–P20) efficiently proceeded to
afford the desired products in 80–98% yield. It should be
noted that for P19 and P20, we observed some redistributed
hydrosilylation byproducts. Arylsilanes are often incorpo-
rated into optical silicone materials because of their high
refractive index. In the presence of Co-A, PhMe2SiH and
Ph2MeSiH efficiently reacted with various alkoxy(vinyl)-
silanes as well as with siloxy(vinyl)silanes to furnish the
desired products in 90–99% yields (P21–P28).
ꢀ
ꢀ
or both of the Co C and Co N bonds in Co-A’ remain intact
or break, or are modified by the two hydrosilylation reagents
during the reaction (protonation/silylation/alkylation) and
ꢀ
ꢀ
how the participation of the Co C or Co N bond affects the
Co oxidation state (redox- vs. non-redox-active catalytic
cycle). In addition, although some dehydrogenative silylation
byproducts (C) were observed (4–10% yield for P3, P6, P24,
We also tested the feasibility of the current protocol
toward the hydrosilylation of vinyl-terminated polymers with
ꢀ
a cross-linker (i.e., polymeric Si H), which are commonly
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 1 – 6
ꢀ 2017 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
3
These are not the final page numbers!