10.1002/anie.201809983
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
COMMUNICATION
[7]
[8]
Recent review: M. Soleilhavoup, G. Bertrand, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2017, 56, 10282-10292.
most efficient way to synthesize diborene 5, this unique
reactivity has the potential to be harnessed for the synthesis of
unsymmetrical B=B or new boron-element double bonds.
a) M. Arrowsmith, D. Auerhammer, R. Bertermann, H. Braunschweig, M.
A. Ali Celik, J. Erdmannsdörfer, I. Krummenacher, T. Kupfer, Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 11263–11267; b) D. A. Ruiz, G. Ung, M.
Melaimi, G. Bertrand, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 7590–7592.
H. Braunschweig, I. Krummenacher, M.-A. Légaré, A. Matler, K.
Radacki, Q. Ye, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 1802–1805
[9]
[10] M. Arrowsmith, J. D. Mattock, J. Böhnke, I. Krummenacher, A. Vargas,
H. Braunschweig, Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 4669–4672.
Scheme 5. Possible mechanism for the reaction of 3 with (CAACMe)BBr3.
[11] M.-A. Légaré, G. Bélanger-Chabot, R. D. Dewhurst, E. Welz, I.
Krummenacher, B. Engels, H. Braunschweig, Science 2018, 359, 896–
900.
[12] a) S. R. Wang, D. Prieschl, J. D. Mattock, M. Arrowsmith, C.
Pranckevicius, T. E. Stennett, R. D. Dewhurst, A. Vargas, H.
Braunschweig, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 6347–6351; b) P.
Bissinger, H. Braunschweig, A. Damme, R. D. Dewhurst, T. Kupfer, K.
Radacki, K. Wagner, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 19044–19047.
[13] a) R. S. Ghadwal, C. J. Schürmann, F. Engelhardt, C. Steinmetzger,
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2014, 29, 4921-4926; b) Y. Wang, G. H. Robinson,
Inorg. Chem. 2011, 50, 12326-12337; c) Z. Wang, B. Quillian, P. Wei, Y.
Xie, C. S. Wannere, R. B. King, H. F. Schaefer III, P. v. R. Schleyer, G.
H. Robinson, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 3298-3299; d) Z. Wang, B.
Quillian, P. Wei, C. S. Wannere, Y. Xie, Y.; R. B. King, H. F. Schaefer
III, P. v. R. Schleyer, G. H. Robinson, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129,
12412–12413.
In conclusion, we have shown that (CAACMe)BH2Br (1)
undergoes a selective, B-B bond-forming, one-electron reduction
to
a
hydride-shift isomer of the tetrahydrodiborane
(CAACMe)2B2H4, compound 2. Subsequent two-electron
reduction of 2 yields the first isolable parent boryl anion,
[(CAACMe)BH2]–, which may be isolated in its monomeric form 3
or dimeric form 3 , depending on the crystallization conditions.
՛
Compound 3 owes its remarkable solution stability to the strong
π acceptor properties of the CAAC ligand, their HOMO being
entirely delocalized over the B-C
π bond. Furthermore,
[(CAACMe)BH2]– can be quantitatively oxidized back to 2, in an
unusual B-B bond-forming oxidation reaction with the TEMPO
[14] Two distinct polymorphs of 2 were obtained, one crystallizing in the
radical. While [(CAACMe)BH2]– reacts as
a typical boron
ꢀ
triclinic space group P 1, presented here in Fig. 2, the other in the
nucleophile towards Me3SnCl, leading to the formation of a new
B-Sn bond, it undergoes a unique B=B double-bond-forming
double salt metathesis with (CAACMe)BBr3, generating the
dihydrodiborene (CAACMe)2B2H2 and 1. In view of these
promising preliminary results, we are continuing to explore the
orthorhombic space group P c a 21, presented in Fig. S22.
[15] a) D. Auerhammer, M. Arrowsmith, H. Braunschweig, R. D. Dewhurst, J.
O. C. Jiménez-Halla, T. Kupfer, Chem. Sci. 2017, 8, 7066-7071; b) M.
R. Momeni, E. Rivard, A. Brown, Organometallics 2013, 32, 6201-6208.
[16] Attempts to calculate the energy barrier for this hydride shift failed as
optimizations of possible transition states simply reverted to compound
2.
reactivity of 3/3 towards other p-block electrophiles.
՛
[17] For the dimer 3 , the HOMO and HOMO–1 are both symmetrically
՛
distributed over the B-C π-bonds of both moieties (see Fig. S28), the B-
C Mayer bond orders amount to 1.517 and the calculated Hirshfeld
partial charges are –0.167 for B1 and –0.054 for C1.
Acknowledgements
[18] M. Arrowsmith, J. Böhnke, H. Braunschweig, M. A. Celik, T. Dellermann,
K. Hammond, Chem. Eur. J. 2016, 22, 17169-17172.
The authors thank the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (H.B.)
and the University of Sussex (A.V.) for financial support.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Keywords: boryl anion • diborane • reduction • nucleophilic
boron • cyclic (alkyl)(amino)carbene
[1]
[2]
Y. Segawa, M. Yamashita, K. Nozaki, Science 2006, 314, 113–115.
Recent reviews: a) L. Weber, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 29, 3461-
3488; b) D. Stephan, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 5984–5992;
J. Monot, A. Solovyev, H. Bonin-Dubarle, E. Derat, D. P. Curran, M.
Robert, L. Fensterbank, M. Malacria, E. Lacôte, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2010, 49, 9166–9169
[3]
[4]
a) R. Bertermann, H. Braunschweig, R. D. Dewhurst, C. Hörl, T.
Kramer, I. Krummenacher, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 5453–
5457; b) H. Braunschweig, C.-W. Chiu, K. Radacki, T. Kupfer, Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 2041–2044.
[5]
[6]
R. Kinjo, B. Donnadieu, M. A. Celik, G. Frenking, G. Bertrand, Science
2011, 333, 610–613.
Recent review: M. Melaimi, R. Jazzar, M. Soleilhavoup, G. Bertrand,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 10046-10068.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.