11922 J. Phys. Chem. B, Vol. 108, No. 32, 2004
Zheng et al.
tion. Among them, methanofullerenes [6,6]-phenyl C61-butyric
acid butyl ester(PCBB) shows better device performance than
the PCBM, a widely investigated and the best C60 derivative-
type acceptor having been reported so far for polymer PV cells.
The energy conversion efficiency reaches 2.84% for PCBB
under AM1.5 illumination (78.2 mW/cm2), compared with 2.0%
for methanofullerenes [6,6]-phenyl C61-butyric acid methyl ester,
PCBM, fabricated at the same conditions. Once the alkyl group
becomes the C16H33, the device performance deteriorates
significantly. These results clearly indicate that both the
interfacial properties of two phases (donor and acceptor) and
the mobility of electrons and holes within corresponding phases
play an important role in the efficiency of the PV cells.
II. Experimental Section
Details of synthesis of methanofullerene derivatives (3a-f)
spectroscopic and analytical data can be found in the Supporting
Information.
Cyclic Voltammetry (CV). The electrochemical measure-
ments of the organic molecule were performed in an electrolyte
consisting of 0.1 mol/L tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophos-
phate (TBAPF6) dissolved in 1,2-dichlorobenzene solution. In
each case, a glassy carbon was used as the working electrode,
platinum wire was used as a counter electrode, and a saturated
calomel electrode was used as a quasi-reference electrode. The
absorption spectrum was taken by an HP 8453 spectrophotom-
eter.
Figure 1. Cyclic Voltammograms of C60 derivatives at 50 mv/s in
1,2-dichlorobenzene containing 0.1M (n-Bu)4NPF6.
butyric acid esters were synthesized according to Scheme S2
by the diazomethane route reported previously by Hummelen
et al.11 All the synthesized fullerene derivatives have been
refluxed in 1,2-dichlorobenzene for more than 8 h. The signals
for the fullerene-sp2 carbons in 13C NMR spectrum indicate Cs-
symmetry. The UV-vis absorbed at 700 nm specific to [6,6]
addition in C60. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-
of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) gave the M-,
according to the calculated value of m/z of all the synthesized
C60 derivatives. The FTIR spectrum showed absorption features
at 521 cm-1, indicative of the fullerene core. The synthesized
compounds’ full and abbreviated names are listed below:
3a: [6,6]-phenyl C61-butyric acid methyl ester, PCBM.
3b: [6,6]-phenyl C61-butyric acid butyl ester, PCBB.
The typical device structure used in this study was a sandwich
structure with ITO/PEDOT as a hole-collecting electrode and
Ba/Al as an electron-collecting electrode. In the structure of
the devices, the active layer has a thickness of 100 nm, as
determined by surface profilometer (Tencor, ALFA-Step 500).
Indium/tin oxide (ITO) was used as the anode and a 50-nm-
thick poly (ethylene dioxythiophene)/polystyrenesulfonic acid
(PEDT-PSS, Batron-P, Bayer AG) layer was incorporated
between the ITO and the active layer to reduce device leakage.
Organic molecules as acceptor were dissolved in p-xylene or
THF solution. MEHPPV was dissolved in a THF/p-xylene
mixture (2:8) solution. Both solutions were mixed to give the
calculated weight ratio of donor material to acceptor material.
The blend solution was spincoated onto the top of PEDT-PSS.
Finally, 3-5 nm of barium followed by 150-nm-thick Al layers
were thermally evaporated onto the top of the photoactive
polymer blend. The deposition rates and the thickness of the
evaporation layers were monitored by a thickness/rate meter
(Sycon). The deposition rates for barium and aluminum were
usually 0.01-0.02 nm/s and 1-2 nm/s, respectively. The
crossing area between the cathode and the anode define the
sensing area. Unless otherwise specified, an 0.15-cm2 active
area was typically used in this study. All the fabrication steps
except spincasting the PEDT:PSS layer were carried out in a
nitrogen glovebox. The IV characteristics in the dark and under
illumination were measured with a Keithley 236 source-measure
unit. Photocurrent was measured under a solar simulator with
AM1.5 illumination (78.2 mW/cm2). The spectral response was
measured with a commercial photomodulation spectroscopic
setup including a Xenon lamp, an optical chopper, a mono-
chromator, and lock-in amplifier operated by PC computer
(Merlin, Oriel). A calibrated Si photodiode was used as a
standard in determination of photosensitivity.
3c: [6,6]-phenyl C61-butyric acid (1-methyl)heptyl ester,
PCBMH.
3d: [6,6]-phenyl C61-butyric acid octyl ester, PCBO.
3e: [6,6]-phenyl C61-butyric acid dodecyl ester, PCBD.
3f: [6,6]-phenyl C61-butyric acid cetyl ester, PCBC.
High molecular weight poly(2-methoxy, 5-(2′-ethylhexyloxy)-
1,4-phenylene vinylene) (MEH-PPV) in this study was syn-
thesized according to the process described by Wudl et al.12
Electrochemical and Optical Properties of C60 Derivatives.
The electrochemical properties of the C60 derivatives were
studied by cyclic voltammetry at a room temperature in 1,2-
dichlorobenzene solution using TBAPF6 (0.1 M) as the sup-
porting electrolyte. 1,2-dichlorobenzene was used as the solvent
for all the C60 derivatives that have very good solubility in this
solvent. The concentration of C60 derivatives (3a-f) ranges from
10-4 to 10-3 M. Graphite working electrodes, Pt counter
electrodes, and SCE as a reference electrodes were used. All
six C60 derivatives (3a-f) show similar cyclic voltammograms
with three quasireversible reduction waves in the potential
ranging from 0.0V to -1.8V. To get clear and distinguished
curves we choose only three representative curves in Figure 1.
More detailed data are listed in Table 1 where E1red, E2red, and
E3red reduction potential (defined as the onset of each reduction
wave) are listed along with C60 and PCBM data obtained in
this study and also from the references.9 Results in Figure 1
and in Table 1 show that all substituted PCBM have almost
identical reduction potential, which indicates that substitution
of alkyl chain length in the butyric esters does not affect the
reduction potential of C60 derivatives.
III. Results and Discussion
Materials. Synthetic route and abbreviations for C60 deriva-
tives are shown in Schemes 1 and S2. The [6,6]-phenyl C61-