1998 J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 123, No. 9, 2001
Andrews and Liang
Alkali and other metal hyponitrites are known in the solid
phase, and evidence has been presented for both cis- and trans-
hyponitrite anion structures; however, these compounds are
unstable.21-24 A hyponitrite species is suggested to form on solid
MgO based on infrared spectra following the adsorption of
NO.25 In laser-ablation experiments with Mg, Ca, and NO, a
sharp, weak 1028.5 cm-1 absorption appeared on ultraviolet
photolysis.26 The isotopic shifts and splittings for this absorption
and its agreement with the spectrum of sodium hyponitrite21-23
suggested a hyponitrite species.
To prepare a small isolated dianion, a rigid matrix host cage
and the electrostatic stabilization of counterions separated by
one or two matrix gas layers from the dianion guest are needed.
This requires the isolation of separate metal atoms and electron
receptor guests followed by appropriate radiation to transfer
valence electrons. Here we describe such experiments to prepare
2-
the isolated hyponitrite dianion N2O2 for the first time.
Figure 1. Infrared spectra in the 1420-1000 cm-1 region for laser-
ablated lithium co-deposited with 0.4% NO in argon at 7 K: (a)
spectrum of sample deposited for 70 min, 256 scans, (b) spectrum after
λ > 240 nm photolysis for 15 min, 192 scans, (c) spectrum after 240-
380 nm photolysis for 15 min, 128 scans, (d) spectrum after annealing
to 25 K, 128 scans, (e) spectrum after annealing to 35 K, 128 scans,
(f) spectrum after 240-380 nm photolysis, 256 scans, and (g) spectrum
after 40 K annealing, 256 scans.
Experimental and Theoretical Methods
The laser-ablation matrix isolation apparatus and experiment have
been described in previous reports.27-29 Metal targets (Li, Na, Mg, Ca,
Ba) positioned 2 cm from the cold window were ablated by focused
1064 nm radiation from a pulsed YAG laser. Nitric oxide (Matheson)
samples were prepared after fractional distillation from a coldfinger;
15NO (MSD Isotopes, 99% 15N) was treated similarly; 15N18O (Isotec,
99.9% 15N, 98.5% 18O) was used as received. A Nicolet 550 FTIR
instrument operating at 0.5 cm-1 resolution (frequency accuracy (0.1
cm-1) with a liquid nitrogen cooled HgCdTe detector was used to record
spectra. The instrument was purged continuously with a Balston 75-
20 compressed air-dryer. Matrix samples were co-deposited on a 7 K
CsI window, irradiated by filtered light from a medium-pressure
mercury lamp (Philips, 175 W) with the globe removed or a tungsten
lamp (Wiko, 90 W), and more spectra were collected.
Density functional theory (DFT) calculations were performed on
potential product molecules by using the Gaussian 94 program system.30
Most calculations employed the hybrid B3LYP functional but com-
parisons were done with the BPW91 functional as well.31,32 The
6-311+G* basis set was used for N, O, and metal atoms.33,34 Geometries
were fully optimized and the vibrational frequencies computed by using
analytical second derivatives.
Alkali Metals. Figure 1 shows the 1420-1000 cm-1 region
of the spectrum from a sample prepared by co-depositing laser-
ablated lithium and 0.4% NO in argon at 7 K. The strong 1351.0
cm-1 band has been assigned to Li(NO) in three previous
investigations by using thermal lithium atoms.14,17,35 The sharp
1589.3, 1243.7, and 1221.0 cm-1 and weak 1300.3, 1221.7, and
1205.0 cm-1 absorptions observed in a large number of laser-
-
ablation experiments with NO are due to isolated (NO)2+, NO2
,
trans-(NO)2-, cis-(NO)2-, and NNO2-, respectively.14,36 The
-
relative absorbance of trans-(NO)2 is 4-6 times greater than
that for (NO)2+ with Li and Na whereas with transition metals
+
the (NO)2 absorption is substantially stronger (10 times for
Ni).36,37 Not shown are strong 795.3 and 650.7 cm-1 bands due
to Li+(NO2-)Li+ and Li(NO), respectively,17 and a weak NO2
band at 1610.8 cm-1. Irradiation with the full light of a medium-
pressure mercury arc lamp (λ > 240 nm) produced a sharp weak
1028.5 cm-1 absorption (Figure 1b) and decreased the 1221.0
cm-1 absorption of trans-(NO)2-. It was noticed that the 1028.5
cm-1 peak intensity decreased during the recording of the scans,
which suggested that visible light from the infrared source might
destroy the species responsible for the new 1028.5 cm-1
absorption. Further irradiation employed a 240-380 nm trans-
mitting black filter and the 1028.5 cm-1 absorption was stronger
(Figure 1c). Annealing to 25 K markedly decreased the 1028.5
cm-1 absorption and increased the 1351.0 cm-1 band, and
annealing to 35 K virtually destroyed the 1028.5 cm-1 band
and produced new 1404.1 and 1392.6 cm-1 features. Another
240-380 nm irradiation (Figure 1f) brought back some of the
1028.5 cm-1 absorption, but final annealing to 40 K destroyed
it (Figure 1g).
Results and Discussion
The new absorptions observed here will be identified by
isotopic substitution and comparison with DFT calculated
isotopic frequencies.
(21) Kuhn, L.; Lippincott, E. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1956, 78, 1820.
(22) Miller, D. J.; Polydropoulos, C. N.; Watson, D. J. Chem. Soc. 1960,
687.
(23) McGraw, G. E.; Bernitt, D. L.; Hisatsune, I. C. Spectrochim. Acta
1967, 23A, 25.
(24) Laane, J.; Ohlsen, J. R. Prog. Inorg. Chem. 1980, 27, 465.
(25) Cerruti, L.; Modone, E.; Guglielminotti, E.; Borello, E. J. Chem.
Soc., Faraday Trans. 1 1974, 70, 729.
(26) Kushto, G. P.; Ding, F.; Liang, B.; Wang, X.; Citra, A.; Andrews,
L. Chem. Phys. 2000, 257, 223.
(27) Burkholder, T. R.; Andrews, L. J. Chem. Phys. 1991, 95, 8697.
(28) Hassanzadeh, P.; Andrews, L. J. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96, 9177.
(29) Zhou, M. F.; Andrews, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998. 120, 13230.
(30) Gaussian 94, ReVision B.1; Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel,
H. B.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B. G.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.;
Keith, T.; Petersson, G. A.; Montgomery, J. A.; Raghavachari, K.;
Al-Laham, M. A.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Ortiz, J. V.; Foresman, J. B.;
Cioslowski, J.; Stefanov, B. B.; Nanayakkara, A.; Challacombe, M.; Peng,
C. Y.; Ayala, P. Y.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Andres, J. L.; Replogle, E.
S.; Gomperts, R.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Binkley, J. S.; Defrees, D. J.;
Baker, J.; Stewart, J. P.; Head-Gordon, M.; Gonzalez, C.; Pople J. A.,
Gaussian, Inc.: Pittsburgh, PA, 1995.
(31) Lee, C.; Yang, E.; Parr, R. G. Phys. ReV. B 1988, 37, 785.
(32) Perdew, J. P. Phys. ReV. B 1986, 33, 8822. Becke, A. D. J. Chem.
Phys. 1993, 98, 5648.
(33) McLean, A. D.; Chandler, G. S. J. Chem. Phys. 1980, 72, 5639.
(34) Krishnan, R.; Binkley, J. S.; Seeger, R.; Pople, J. A. J. Chem. Phys.
1980, 72, 650.
Figure 2 illustrates the 1410-1000 cm-1 region of the
spectrum of a matrix containing laser-ablated sodium and 0.4%
NO. The strong 1358.3 cm-1 band is due to Na(NO).14,38 The
same NO2 and (NO)2 bands are observed.14,36 Full-arc
-
-
(35) Andrews, W. L. S.; Pimentel, G. C. J. Chem. Phys. 1966, 44, 2361.
(36) Andrews, L.; Zhou, M. F.; Willson, S. P.; Kushto, G. P.; Snis, A.;
Panas, I. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 109, 177.
(37) Zhou, M. F.; Andrews, L. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 3915 (Fe,
Co, Ni + NO).
(38) Tevault, D. E.; Andrews, L. J. Phys. Chem. 1973, 77, 1646 (Na +
NO).