Paper
RSC Advances
with DMF and acetonitrile as the reaction solvent (entries 7–11,
Table 1); it is because DMF and acetonitrile were barely oxidized
to aldehyde.
In summary, we have successfully developed a solvent-
controllable photoreaction involving 4-methoxyazobenzenes
that could be used to synthesize 1-aryl-1H-benzimidazoles or N-
arylbenzene-1,2-diamines in moderate to good yields.
Scheme 7 The o-semidine rearrangement of 5c in acidic DMF without
irradiation.
(Scheme 6), and these are described below. 4-Methox-
yazobenzene (2a) is protonated by hydrochloric acid in acidic
media, and then protonated 2a is irradiated and undergoes
a photoredox reaction with DMF or EtOH to produce 4-methoxy-
hydrazobenzene (5a) as the photoreduction product. Aer-
wards, an o-semidine rearrangement17,21 immediately takes
place to transform 5a into 4-methoxy-N2-phenylbenzene-1,2-
diamine (3a), which is the major product when using DMF as
the reaction solvent. However, when EtOH is the reaction
solvent, acetaldehyde may be produced during the photoredox
reaction; this can consequently react with the di-amino groups
of 3a to afford the intermediate 4a-H, and then 6-methoxy-2-
methyl-1-phenyl-1H-benzimidazole (4a) can be quickly formed
via aromatization with an appropriate oxidative reagent.22 In
addition, when irradiation occurs in acidic acetal, the hydro-
lysis of acetal23 results in the production of a large amount of
acetaldehyde in the reaction system, which leads to the
formation of 4a in high yields.
In order to conrm the possibility of the existence of 4-
methoxyhydrazobenzene, the derivative 2c was reduced to
hydrazobenzene (5c)24 with tributyltin hydride. When 5c reacted
with hydrochloric acid in DMF without irradiation, the product
3c could be obtained as the major product (62.8%) with the
oxidative product 2c (26.4%) as the side product (Scheme 7).
The formation of 3c is consistent with the results from the
irradiation of 2c in DMF containing hydrochloric acid, which
may explain the existence of hydrazobenzenes.
To understand the possible source of acetaldehyde, the o-
semidine rearrangement (without irradiation) of 4-methoxyhy-
drazobenzene (5a) was performed in acidic EtOH, and
compound 3a was formed as the major product with a trace
amount of 4a (Scheme 8). However, when 2a was irradiated in
acidic EtOH, both 3a and 4a could be obtained as major prod-
ucts (entries 13–15, Table 1). The difference between the reac-
tions with and without irradiation could be used to deduce the
fact that acetaldehyde, which reacted with 3a to afford 4a, may
come from the photoredox reaction between 4-methox-
yazobenzene (2a) and ethanol. This is also the reason why
benzimidazoles are barely obtained when irradiation occurred
Conflicts of interest
We have no conicts of interest to declare.
Acknowledgements
We thank the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) of
Taiwan (R.O.C.) for nancial support. We also thank Ms S.-L.
Huang and Dr Iren Wang of MOST (National Taiwan Univer-
sity) for assistance with NMR experiments.
Notes and references
1 D. A. Horton, G. T. Bourne and M. L. Smythe, Chem. Rev.,
2003, 103, 893.
2 (a) A. R. Katritzky, D. A. Dobchev, D. C. Fara and M. Karelson,
Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2005, 13, 6598; (b) C. Zhong, J. He, C. Xue
and Y. Li, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2004, 12, 4009.
´
´ ´
Lopez-Martınez,
3 C.
Z.
Gomez-Castro,
M.
´
J. Hernandez-Pineda, J. G. Trujillo-Ferrara and
´
I. I. Padilla-Martınez, J. Mol. Recognit., 2019, 32, e2801.
4 W. Hamaguchi, N. Masuda, M. Isomura, S. Miyamoto,
S. Kikuchi, Y. Amano, K. Honbou, T. Mihara and
T. Watanabe, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2013, 21, 7612.
5 (a) E. R. Sauve, J. Paeng, S. Yamaguchi and Z. M. Hudson, J.
Org. Chem., 2020, 85, 108; (b) B. Jiao, J. Wang, J. Huang,
M. Cao, C. Liu, G. Yin, Y. Zhu, B. Zhang and C. Dua, Org.
Electron., 2019, 64, 158.
6 (a) D. Yin, Z.-Y. Chen, N.-R. Jiang, Y.-F. Liu, Y.-G. Bi,
X.-L. Zhang, W. Han, J. Feng and H.-B. Sun, Org. Electron.,
2020, 76, 105494; (b) Z. Chen, C.-L. Ho, L. Wang and
W.-Y. Wong, Adv. Mater., 2020, 32, 1903269.
7 (a) Z.-H. Li, X.-M. Sun, J.-J. Qin, Z.-Y. Tan, W.-B. Wang and
Y. Ma, Tetrahedron, 2020, 76, 130945; (b) H. Li, J. Qin,
Z. Yang, X. Guan, L. Zhang, P. Liao and X. Li, Chem.
Commun., 2015, 51, 8637.
8 (a) Y. Shi, Q. Zhou, F. Du, Y. Fu, Y. Du, T. Fang and G. Chen,
Tetrahedron Lett., 2019, 60, 151082; (b) H. Baars, A. Beyer,
S. V. Kohlhepp and C. Bolm, Org. Lett., 2014, 16, 536.
9 Y. Chen, F. Xu and Z. Sun, RSC Adv., 2017, 7, 44421.
10 (a) D. Koseki, E. Aoto, T. Shoji, K. Watanabe, Y. In, Y. Kita
and T. Dohi, Tetrahedron Lett., 2019, 60, 1281; (b)
D. T. Ziegler, J. Choi, J. M. Munoz-Molina, A. C. Bissember,
J. C. Peters and G. C. Fu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 13107.
11 (a) K. Selvam and M. Swaminathan, Tetrahedron Lett., 2011,
52, 3386; (b) G. M. Raghavendra, A. B. Ramesha,
C. N. Revanna, K. N. Nandeesh, K. Mantelingu and
K. S. Rangappa, Tetrahedron Lett., 2011, 52, 5571.
Scheme 8 The o-semidine rearrangement of 5a in acidic EtOH
without irradiation.
© 2021 The Author(s). Published by the Royal Society of Chemistry
RSC Adv., 2021, 11, 6662–6666 | 6665