Desorption/Reorganization of Self-Assembled Monolayers
J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 122, No. 29, 2000 7073
at 20 eV for sulfur and 50 eV for others. A freshly prepared Au substrate
was used as a reference. All peaks were corrected against Au 4f7/2 (BE
) 84.0 eV). Four elements were collected on each sample: Au, C, S,
and O with an acquisition time of 1000, 400, 12000, and 400 s for
each respective element. Curve fitting was done with Omicon-Presents
using Marquardt-Levenburg method.
sponding bulk thiol materials. For nonpolar methyl-terminal
thiols, the assembly either randomized to a disordered liquid
state (for chain length <C16) or maintained a well-ordered
physisorbed monolayer state (for chain length gC18), which is
similar to that of a physisorbed Langmuir-type film transferred
from the air/water interface. The results are rationalized as a
minimization of surface energy at the substrate surface.
Quartz Crystal Microbalance. A SEIKO EG&G quartz crystal
analyzer (Model QCA 917) was used to record the mass changes upon
adsorption/desorption. The 9 MHz AT-cut quartz crystals (supplied by
SEIKO EG&G) with a surface area of 0.3 cm2 Au electrodes were
used for all the studies. The crystals were cleaned for a few seconds
with a 1:1 mixture of hot concentrated H2SO4 and H2O2 (30%) solution,
followed by washing with Milli-Q water, THF, and hexane and finally
drying in a stream of nitrogen. Monolayers were prepared by immersing
the gold-coated quartz crystal in a thiol solution for 1 day and rinsing
with ethanol and drying with nitrogen. The H2S-induced desorption
studies were conducted by the ex situ method. The monolayer-modified
quartz crystals were placed in an H2S chamber for different periods of
time and the frequency change was measured after the sample was
washed with ethanol and THF. The resolution of the frequency change
is within (2 Hz. All experiments were conducted in a closed Faraday
cage system to avoid noise and external disturbance.
Experimental Section
Materials. Gold (>99.99%) and chromium (>99.99%) were ob-
tained from Johnson Matthey Company. One-side polished silicon
wafers were purchased from Semiconductor Processing Company.
Absolute ethanol and GR grade THF were obtained from Merck and
used as received. Saturated alkanethiols were obtained from Aldrich.
Hydrogen sulfide (99.5+% lecture bottle) was obtained from Aldrich.
The thiols 16-mercaptohexadecanoic acid, methyl 16-mercaptohexa-
decanoate, 16-mercapto-1-hexadecanol, and 16-mercaptohexadecana-
mide were prepared according to literature procedures.11,12 17-
Mercaptoheptadecanenitrile was prepared from 16-bromohexadecanol
by reacting with sodium cyanide in DMSO. The resulting 17-
hydroxyheptadecanenitrile was treated with p-toluenesulfonyl chloride
and then sodium thioacetate. Hydrolysis of the thioester gave the desired
product. Fractional recrystallization gave the 17-mercaptoheptade-
canenitrile as a white solid: 1H NMR δ 2.52 (2H, q), 2.34 (2H, t),
1.26 (28H, br s), mp 38-39 °C.
Monolayer Preparation. The gold substrates were prepared by
vacuum deposition of ∼7 nm of chromium and then 200 nm of gold
onto 2-in. silicon wafers under a vacuum of 2 × 10-6 Torr at a rate of
∼0.5 nm/s. An ethanolic solution (∼1 mM) of each thiol was prepared
under ambient condition. A monolayer of respective thiol was prepared
by soaking the gold substrate in the solution for at least 4 h before
being withdrawn from the solution and rinsed three times with pure
ethanol and once with THF then blown dry with a stream of pure
nitrogen. The thiol monolayer was subjected to IR or other characteriza-
tion within 3 h after preparation. No sign of structural change could
be detected by reflection-absorption IR during this period of ambient
storage.
Reflection-Absorption IR Spectroscopy. Reflection-absorption
IR spectra were taken on a Digilab FTS60 Fourier transform IR
spectrometer equipped with a liquid nitrogen-cooled MCT detector.
Single reflection with a grazing angle of 86° of the incident beam was
used. Spectra were taken with p-polarized light. An ozone-cleaned gold
wafer was used as the reference sample.
Results and Discussion
The displacement of alkanethiolate from the gold surface by
hydrogen sulfide was evidenced by a variety of techniques,
which are presented in the following.
Electrochemical Reductive Desorption. It has been estab-
lished that alkanethiolate can be reductively desorbed from the
surface of a gold electrode.5 The potential at which the adsorbate
desorbs depends on the packing as well as the chain length of
the thiolate moiety and the pH of the medium. Figure 1 shows
the typical reductive wave for a hexadecanethiol monolayer on
gold (abbreviated as Au/SC15CH3) at -1.36 V vs Ag/AgCl (3M
NaCl) in 0.5 M KOH in the first scan. The sharp peak will
shift to lower potential and broaden in successive cycles, due
to the partial loss of the thiolate moiety into the electrolyte
solution during the desorption-readsorption cycle.13 In contrast,
the cyclic voltammogram of a gold surface exposed to H2S vapor
gave a very sharp reductive desorption wave at -0.88 V. A
small anodic peak was observed during the reverse scan. It is
noted that a similar reductive peak (-0.9 V) was observed for
the Na2S-treated gold surface, and it was attributed to atomic
and/or oligomeric sulfur adlayer.10 The reduction peak current
increases linearly with increasing scan rate, indicating a surface-
confined species.14 When Au/SC15CH3 was exposed to H2S
for various periods of time and rinsed, the cyclic voltammogram
showed that a peak around -0.9 V was growing with time,
while the peak associated with a closely packed C16 thiolate
was lost within the first 2 h of exposure. The peak at around
-0.9 V gained its full intensity after exposure to H2S for around
6 h, together with some broad peaks present between -1.1 and
-1.2 V. This clearly suggests the replacement of the long-chain
thiol by the small H2S molecules.
Exposure Experiment. The film-covered substrate surface was
placed in a 1-L chamber and purged with a slow stream of N2 for 10
min. The H2S vapor (10 mL) was injected via a syringe to make up a
1% H2S atmosphere in the chamber. After the sample was exposed for
various amounts of time, it was retrieved and characterized directly
(as in the case of IR) or soaked in ethanol and THF consecutively before
characterization for the presence of the monolayer material.
Electrochemical Studies. All electrochemical studies were carried
out using a BAS 100B Electrochemical Analyzer (Bioanalytical System
USA). A three-electrode-cell system with a single compartment was
used. A 2000 Å gold-coated silicon wafer with ∼70 Å chromium as
an adhesion layer was used as a working electrode and a platinum spiral
wire served as a counter electrode. An Ag/AgCl (3M NaCl) electrode
acted as the reference electrode. A 0.5 M KOH solution was used as
the supporting electrolyte. Samples were purged with purified argon
gas for 10 min before starting the experiments. All potentials were
recorded against the Ag/AgCl reference. For electrochemical study, the
freshly prepared Au substrates were annealed at 300 °C for 3 h in a
muffle furnace followed by treatment with UV irradiation for 1 h to
remove organic impurities on the gold surface. After the UV treatment,
substrates were washed with ultrapure water and then rinsed with
ethanol and dried in a stream of nitrogen prior to monolayer formation.
For the H2S-induced desorption studies, the monolayer-modified Au
substrates were exposed to the H2S for various periods of time and
then rinsed with ethanol before the cyclic voltammogram experiments.
X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy. The X-ray photoelectron
spectroscopy experiments were performed on an Omicon ESCA system
with an Al KR monochromator X-ray source and EA 125 Hemispherical
analyzer. The X-ray power suppliers were run at 14 kV and 12 mA at
a pressure of 2 × 10-10 mbar. The pass energy of the analyzer was set
(12) Nuzzo, R. G.; Dubois L. H.; Allara, D. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990,
112, 558-569.
(13) (a) Lamp, B. D.; Hobara, D.; Porter, M. D.; Niki, K.; Cotton, T. M.
Langmuir 1997, 13, 736-741. (b) Wierse, D. G.; Lohrengel, M. M.;
Schultze, J. W. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1978, 92, 121-131.
(14) Murray, R. W. In Electroanalytical Chemistry; Bard, A. J., Ed.;
Marcel Dekker: New York, 1984; Vol. 13.
(11) Bain, C. D.; Troughton, E. B.; Tao, Y. T.; Evall, J.; Whitesides, G.
M.; Nuzzo, R. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 321-335.