Stereoselective Synthesis of Ciguatoxin Right Wing Fragments
SCHEME 2. Syn th esis of th e LM Rin g of CTX3Ca
using the undesired isomer 25R were investigated (Table
1). Whereas CSA typically caused decomposition of the
compound at high temperature, products 25R and 25â
survived under PPTS treatment even at 80 °C. The ratio
of the desired 25â depended considerably on the solvent,
and acetonitrile was found to be the best solvent of those
studied (25â/25R ) 8.5:1). Application of these modified
conditions for the acetal formation step led directly to
the selective formation of 25â (85% yield, Scheme 3) in
the same ratio (8.5:1). The isolated 25R was again
isomerized to obtain additional 25â in 75% yield. The
other Sharpless asymmetric dihydroxylation product,
C51 epimer 22, was subjected to transacetalization to
selectively afford 24â (24â/24R ) 5:1). The C51 stereo-
center of 24â was then inverted under Mitsunobu condi-
tions18 to obtain 25â in 91% yield after saponification of
the benzoyl ester.9i
The secondary alcohol of spiroacetal 25â was tempo-
rarily masked with TIPS in 96% yield, and the benzyl
group was then removed by hydrogenolysis to provide
primary alcohol 26. After oxidation of 26, addition of 1916
to aldehyde 27 created the two stereocenters (C43, C44),
giving rise to 28 with complete stereochemical control
(79% for three steps). Removal of the TIPS group from
28 and introduction of the NAP group produced bis-NAP
ether 29 in 99% overall yield. Finally, oxidative cleavage
of the terminal olefin of 29, followed by oxidation to the
carboxylic acid, led to the 51-hydroxyl LM ring fragment
11 in 82% yield for two steps.
a
Reagents and conditions: (a) (Sia)2BH, THF, 0 °C, then
NaHCO3, H2O2; (b) CSA, (CH2Cl)2, rt, 75% (three steps); (c) H2,
Pd(OH)2/C, EtOAc, rt, 100%; (d) (COCl)2, DMSO, Et3N, CH2Cl2,
-80 to -60 °C; (e) 19, toluene, -80 to -70 °C; (f) NAPBr, NaH,
DMF, THF, rt, 52% (three steps); (g) OsO4, NMO, t-BuOH/H2O
(1:1), rt, then NaIO4, rt; (h) NaClO2, NaH2PO4‚2H2O, 2-methyl-
2-butene, t-BuOH/H2O (4:1), rt, 99% (two steps).
droboration-oxidation sequence was carried out on the
terminal olefin of 15 followed by acid treatment to afford
the thermodynamically stable spiroacetal 16 as a single
isomer in 75% overall yield. The liberation of the primary
alcohol of 16 by hydrogenolysis and subsequent oxidation
under Swern conditions led to aldehyde 18.11 Subsequent
treatment of 18 with (R,R)-diisopropyl tartrate (Z)-
crotylboronate 1916 resulted in stereoselective introduc-
tion of both the C43-methyl and C44-hydroxyl groups.
After NAP protection of the newly formed secondary
alcohol, 20 was isolated as a single isomer in 52% yield
from 17. Finally, oxidative cleavage of the olefin of 20
and subsequent oxidation provided carboxylic acid 10
quantitatively.
As illustrated in Scheme 3, the same starting material
15 was used for the synthesis of the 51-hydroxyl LM ring
fragment 11. After conversion of hemiacetal 15 to methyl
acetal 21 (94%), the 51-OH group was installed by
Sharpless asymmetric dihydroxylation using (DHQ)2PYR
as a ligand,17 yielding desired diol 23 as the major
diastereomer (23/22 ) 4:1, 97% yield). Subsequent M ring
formation of the isolated 23 under the conditions used
to prepare 16 [CSA, (CH2Cl)2] exhibited little preference
for the presumably thermodynamically more stable 25â
(25â/25R ) 2:1). Thus, conditions for transacetalization
Syn th esis of HI Rin g F r a gm en t. The common
coupling partner of 10 and 11, HI ring fragment 9, was
efficiently prepared from the known I ring 5 using Mori’s
oxiranyl anion strategy (Scheme 4).12 Diol 511b was con-
verted to unstable triflate 30 by stepwise addition of Tf2O
and TESOTf in the presence of 2,6-lutidine and molecular
sieves 4A. A mixture of the resultant 30 and epoxysulfone
812d in THF-HMPA was treated with n-BuLi at -110
°C for 30 min, leading to the formation of the desired
coupling adduct 31. At this stage, 6-endo cyclization to
construct the H ring was realized by subjecting 31 to
p-TsOH in CHCl3 with p-methoxybenzaldehyde dimethyl
acetal to afford fused ether 32 through concomitant
removal of TES (51% from 5). The presence of the
dimethyl acetal in the reaction mixture was necessary
for in situ reattachment of the MP acetal to partially
deprotected 31 and/or 32. The obtained 32 was stereo-
selectively reduced using NaBH4, and the newly formed
alcohol was protected as its TIPS ether to give 33 as the
sole isomer in quantitative yield (two steps), thus com-
pleting five-step construction of the H ring from 5. After
acid-promoted removal of the MP acetal from 33, one-
carbon extension of 34 at the primary alcohol via iodi-
nation (87%) and displacement with cyanide (99%) led
to 35. TES protection of secondary alcohol 35 yielded 36
quantitatively. Nitrile 36 was reduced to the correspond-
ing aldehyde, which was then converted to dithioacetal
37 using phenyl disulfide and PBu3 (83% yield, two
steps).19 For the next coupling reaction, the TES group
of the tris-silylated 37 was selectively removed using
(13) (a) Gaunt, M. J .; Yu, J .; Spencer, J . B. J . Org. Chem. 1998, 63,
4172-4173. (b) Wright, J . A.; Yu, J .; Spencer, J . B. Tetrahedron Lett.
2001, 42, 4033-4036. (c) Xia, J .; Abbas, S. A.; Locke, R. D.; Piskorz,
C. F.; Alderfer, J . L.; Matta, K. L. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 169-
173.
(14) Oishi, T.; Shoji, M.; Kumahara, N.; Hirama, M. Chem. Lett.
1997, 845-846.
(15) The numbering of carbon atoms in all compounds in this paper
corresponds to that of CTX3C.
(16) Roush, W. R.; Ando, K.; Powers, D. B.; Palkowitz, A. D.;
Halterman, R. L. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 6339-6348.
(17) (a) Crispino, G. A.; J eong, K. S.; Kolb, H. C.; Wang, Z. M.; Xu,
D.; Sharpless, K. B. J . Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 3785-3786. For a review,
see: (b) Kolb, H. C.; VanNieuwenhze, M. S.; Sharpless, K. B. Chem.
Rev. 1994, 94, 2483-2547.
(18) For reviews on Mitusnobu reaction, see: (a) Mitsunobu, O.
Synthesis 1981, 1-28. (b) Hughes, D. L. Org. React. 1992, 42, 335-
656.
(19) Tazaki, M.; Takagi, M. Chem. Lett. 1979, 767-770.
J . Org. Chem, Vol. 69, No. 8, 2004 2799