J. Thanusu et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 713–717
717
9. Mokio, I. G.; Soldatenkov, A. T.; Federov, V. O.; Ageev, E. A.; Sergeeva, N. D.; Lin,
S.; Stashenku, E. E.; Prostakov, N. S.; Andreeva, E. I. Khim. Farm. Zh. 1989, 23,
421.
10. Dimmock, J. R.; Kumar, P. Curr. Med. Chem. 1997, 4, 1.
11. Kubota, H.; Kakefuda, A.; Okamoto, Y.; Fujii, M.; Yamamoto, O.; Yamgiwa, Y.;
Orita, M.; Ikeda, M.; Takenchi, M.; Shibanuma, T.; Fsomura, Y. Chem. Pharm.
Bull. 1998, 46, 1538.
12. Johnson, T. B.; Chernoff, L. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1913, 35, 1208.
13. Tompkins, J. E. J. Med. Chem. 1986, 29, 855.
14. Al-Obaid, A. M.; El-Subbagh, H. I.; Khodair, A. I.; Elmazar, M. M. Anticancer
Drugs 1996, 7, 873.
15. Froelich, E.; Fruehan, A.; Jackman, M.; Kirchner, F. K.; Alexander, E. J.; Archer, S.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1954, 76, 3099.
16. Marx, J. V.; Richert, D. A.; Westerfeld, W. W. J. Med. Chem. 1970, 13, 1179.
17. El-Barbary, A. A.; Khodair, A. I.; Pedersen, E. B.; Nielsen, C. J. Med. Chem. 1994,
37, 73.
18. Chérouvrier, J. R.; Carreaux, F.; Bazureau, J. P. Molecules 2004, 9, 867.
19. Archer, S.; Unser, M. J.; Froelich, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1956, 78, 6182.
20. Marton, J.; Enisz, J.; Hosztafi, S.; Timar, T. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1993, 41,
148.
data. A close survey of the in vitro antibacterial and antifungal
activity profile of the new 3-(3-alkyl-2,6-diarylpiperin-4-yli-
dene)-2-thioxoimidazolidin-4-ones 46–60 against the tested clini-
cally isolated bacterial and fungal strains gave a clear picture about
the structure–activity correlations among compounds 45–60 un-
der study. Compounds 47–50, 52–55 and 57–60 with fluoro,
chloro, methoxy or methyl functions at the para position of phenyl
rings attached to C-2 and C-6 carbons of piperidine moiety along
with and without methyl substituent at position C-3 of the piper-
idine ring exerted a varied range of biological activities, while the
activity was not significant for compounds 46, 51 and 56 without
any substituents at C-3 of the piperidine ring and the para position
of the phenyl groups. Furthermore, the observed marked antibac-
terial and antifungal activities may be considered as key steps for
the building of novel chemical entities with comparable pharmaco-
logical profiles to that of the standard drugs.
21. Curran, A. C. W. U.S. Pat. 3, 984,430, 1976.
22. Nagpal, K. L. U.S. Pat.4, 473,393, 1984.
23. Cromwellt, L. D.; Stark, G. R. Biochemistry 1969, 8, 4735.
24. Nelson, J. V.; Helber, M. J.; Brick, M. U.S. Pat. 5, 695,917, 1997.
25. Kandil, S. S.; El-Hefnawy, G. B.; Baker, E. A. Thermochim. Acta 2004, 414,
105.
Acknowledgments
Authors are thankful to NMR Research Centre, Indian Institute
of Science, Bangalore for recording spectra. One of the authors
namely V. Kanagarajan is grateful to Council of Scientific and
Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi, Republic of India for provid-
ing financial support in the form of CSIR-Senior Research Fellow-
ship (SRF) in Organic Chemistry. Another author J. Thanusu is
highly thankful to Annamalai University authorities for providing
University Studentship.
26. (a) Gopalakrishnan, M.; Sureshkumar, P.; Thanusu, J.; Kanagarajan, V. Chem.
Heterocycl. Comp. 2008, 44, 950; (b) Gopalakrishnan, M.; Sureshkumar, P.;
Thanusu, J.; Kanagarajan, V. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2008, 23, 974; (c)
Gopalakrishnan, M.; Sureshkumar, P.; Thanusu, J.; Kanagarajan, V. J. Enzyme
Inhib. Med. Chem. 2008, 23, 347; (d) Gopalakrishnan, M.; Thanusu, J.;
Kanagarajan, V. Med. Chem. Res. 2007, 16, 392.
27. Spectral data for compound 46: IR (KBr) (cmÀ1): 3400, 3306, 3060, 3029, 2980,
2896, 2797, 1728, 1635, 1598, 1215, 701, 758, 1041; MS: m/z = 365 (M+1)+.
Elemental Anal. Calcd: C, 65.91; H, 5.53; N, 15.37. Found: C, 65.87; H, 5.50; N,
15.33. 1H NMR (d ppm): 1.97–2.05 (m, 1H, H3a), 2.37–2.41 (dd, 1H, H3e
,
J3e,3a = 13.64 Hz, J3e,2a = 2.96 Hz); 2.43–2.52 (m, 1H, H5a), 2.83 (s, 1H, NH of
piperidine), 3.62–3.66 (dd, H5e, J5e,5a = 2.96 Hz, J5e,6a = 13.52 Hz), 3.80 (s, 2H,
CH2 of imidazolidine), 3.88–3.92 (dd, 1H, H2a, J2a,3e = 3.08 Hz, J2a,3a = 11.76 Hz),
4.15–4.19 (dd, 1H, H6a, J6a,5e = 3.20 Hz, J6a,5a = 11.88 Hz), 7.23–7.50 (m, 10H,
Ar–H’s), 11.78 (s, NH of imidazolidine); In the D2O exchanged 1H NMR
spectrum, two peaks at 2.83 ppm and 11.78 ppm which resonances due to NH
of piperidine and imidazolidine, respectively, disappeared; 13C NMR (d ppm):
29.6 C-3, 37.3 C-5, 43.6 CH2 of imidazolidine, 60.2 C-2, 61.1 C-6, 126.5–128.1
Ar–C’s, 144.0, 144.1 ipso-C, 163.1 C@N, 167.6 C@O, 173.8 C@S. In six-
membered heterocycles, a decrease in electronegativity of a group in the
ring deshields b-carbons and shields b-protons. Hence for compound 46, the
deshielding of anti b-C-6 carbon with respect to thioxoimidazoline ring was in
accordance with the expected electronegativity effect whereas the syn b-C-2
carbon was shielded.30
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References and notes
1. Baliah, V.; Jeyaraman, R.; Chandrasekaran, L. Chem. Rev. 2008, 83, 379.
2. Noller, C. R.; Baliah, V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1948, 70, 3853.
3. Lijinsky, W.; Taylor, H. Int. J. Cancer 1975, 16, 318.
4. El-Subbagh, H. I.; Abu-Zaid, S. M.; Mahran, M. A.; Badria, F. A.; Alofaid, A. M. J.
Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 2915.
5. Watson, A. A.; Fleet, G. W. J.; Asano, N.; Molyneux, R. J.; Nugh, J. Phytochemistry
2001, 56, 265.
6. Ganellin, C. R.; Spickett, R. G. J. Med. Chem. 1965, 8, 619.
7. Hagenbach, R. E.; Gysin, H. Experimentia 1952, 8, 184.
8. Ileana, B.; Dobre, V.; Nicluescu-Duvaz, I. J. Prakt. Chem. 1985, 327, 667.
28. Lipinski, C. A.; Lombardo, F.; Dominy, B. W.; Feeney, P. J. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev.
1997, 23, 3.
29. Purser, S.; Moore, P. R.; Swallow, S.; Gouverneur, V. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37,
320.
30. Pandiarajan, K.; Sabapathi Mohan, R. T.; Hasan, M. U. Magn. Reson. Chem. 1986,
24, 312.