Z. Wang et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A 71 (2008) 1224–1227
To explore further the practical utility of 2 as an ion-selective
chemosensor for Cu2+, the interference in the selective responses of
2 in the presence Cu2+, from the other metal cations tested, was also
studied by using cross-selectivity experiments (Figs. 7 and 8). No
significant variation in its spectrum and solution color was found by
comparison with that without the other metal ions besides Cu2+
.
Moreover, no obvious interference was observed in its spectrum
while performing the titrations with Cu2+ in the different mixtures
of metal ions. The above results indicated that its selectivity for Cu2+
was remarkable.
4. Conclusion
In summary, we have developed
a simple colorimetric
chemosensor 2 for recognition of metal cations, and it displays
high selectivity and sensitivity for Cu2+ by the UV–vis absorption
(appearing a new peak at 525 nm) and color change. The recog-
nition of Cu2+ gave rise to major color changes from yellow to
red that was clearly visible to the naked-eye. Such Cu2+ selec-
tive colorimetric chemosensors could be of great importance and
practicability in widely field, such as serum detection of med-
ical diagnostics. The practical application of chemosensor 2 to
recognition Cu2+ in some samples will be investigated in the
future.
Fig. 7. Absorption spectra of 2 (1.2 × 10−4 M) in a mixture (1:1, v:v) of CH3OH/H2O
(1:1, v:v) with increasing of Cu2+ in the presence of Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+ and Al3+
(6.0 × 10−5 M, respectively).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science
Foundation of PR China (No. 30700534) and the Natural Science
Foundation of Shanxi Province (No. 20031017).
References
[1] Z.C. Xu, X.H. Qian, J.N. Cui, Org. Lett. 7 (2005) 3029.
[2] L.H. Feng, Z.B. Chen, Sens. Actuators B: Chem. 120 (2007) 665.
[3] R. Sundari, M. Ahmad, L.Y. Heng, Sens. Actuators B: Chem. 113 (2006) 201.
[4] T. Mayr, I. Klimant, O.S. Wolfbeis, T. Werner, Anal. Chim. Acta 462 (2002) 1.
[5] V.K. Gupta, A.K. Jain, G. Maheshwari, H. Langb, Z. Ishtaiwi, Sens. Actuators B:
Chem. 117 (2006) 99.
[6] N. Mahendra, P. Gangaiya, S. Subramaniam, R. Narayanaswamy, Sens. Actuators
B: Chem. 90 (2003) 118.
[7] Y. Xiang, A.J. Tong, P.Y. Jin, Y. Ju, Org. Lett. 8 (2006) 2863.
[8] K. Rurack, M. Kollmannsberger, U.R. Genger, J. Daub, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122
(2000) 968.
[9] Q. Wu, E.V. Anslyn, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126 (2004) 14682.
[10] J.S. Yang, C.S. Lin, C.Y. Hwang, Org. Lett. 3 (2001) 889.
[11] R. Martinez, F. Zapata, A. Caballero, A. Espinosa, A. Ta´rraga, P. Molina, Org. Lett.
8 (2006) 3235.
[12] T. Gunnlaugsson, J.P. Leonard, N.S. Murray, Org. Lett. 6 (2004) 1557.
[13] M.L. Jose, M.M. Ramon, P. Teresa, S. Juan, E.P.T. Miguel, Chem. Commun. (1998)
837.
[14] Y. Xiao, X. Qian, Tetrahedron Lett. 44 (2003) 2087.
[15] H. Yang, Z.Q. Liu, Z.G. Zhou, E.X. Shi, F.Y. Li, Y.K. Du, T. Yia, C.H. Huang, Tetrahe-
dron Lett. 47 (2006) 2911.
[16] Y. Zheng, J. Orbulescu, X. Ji, F.M. Andreopoulos, S.M. Pham, R.M. Leblanc, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 125 (2003) 2680.
Fig. 8. Difference UV spectra of 2 (1.2 × 10−4 M) in a mixture (1:1, v:v) of CH3OH/H2O
(1:1, v:v) with increasing of Cu2+ in the presence of Fe3+, Cr3+, Fe2+, Co2+, Ni2+, Zn2+
,
Ag+, Cd2+, Hg2+, and Pb2+ (6.0 × 10−5 M, respectively).
Cu2+ to CH3OH/H2O 2 suggests a 2:1 binding mode. This 2:1 binding
stoichiometry was also accordant with hypothesis binding model
of 2 and Cu2+
.
The sensitive signal response of 2 toward Cu2+ was preserved in
CH3OH–H2O (v/v = 1/1, pH 7.6) by absorption spectra. The complex-
ation resulted in a strong change of 2 in its absorption intensity and
appeared a new length wave peak upon the addition of increasing
amounts of Cu2+, which might be caused by the interaction of Cu2+
with the lone electron pair of N, O atoms and formed stable com-
plex. Its new absorption increased linearly with the concentration
[17] S. Banthia, A. Samanta, J. Phys. Chem. B 106 (2002) 5572.
[18] Z. Xu, Y. Xiao, X. Qian, J. Cui, D. Cui, Org. Lett. 7 (2005) 889.
[19] H. Stephan, H. Spies, B. Johannsen, C. Kauffmann, F. Vogtle, Org. Lett. 2 (2000)
2343.
[20] D.A. Loy, B. Mather, A.R. Straumanis, C. Baugher, D.A. Schneider, A. Sanchez, K.J.
Shea, Chem. Mater. 16 (2004) 2041.
of Cu2+ ((0.01–0.6) × 10−4 M, R2 = 0.99854) up to a ratio (2/Cu2+
)
of 2:1, and there it remained (Fig. 6). Furthermore, Cu2+ could be
detected at least down to 1.0 × 10−6 M when 2 was employed at
1.00 × 10−5 M in CH3OH–H2O (v/v = 1/1, pH 7.6), and its absorbance
intensity also increased linearly with the concentration of Cu2+
.