B. C. Ranu et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 43 (2002) 5993–5995
5995
non-aromatic derivatives was rather complex giving a
comparatively low yield of vinylidene dichloride along
with some unidentified side products (entry 6). This is
not unusual for non-aromatic substrates and we
obtained similar results in our earlier observations dur-
ing the reduction of vic- and gem-dibromides.2d,2e It
may be assumed that these reductions occur through a
SET process and thus the intermediate radical species
are more stabilized in the aryl-substituted derivatives.
When 2 equiv. of indium were used, the tribro-
momethyl sulphonates underwent two consecutive
reductions to produce the corresponding vinyl bromides
as final products (entries 20–22). This is to be expected
as we have observed earlier that indium reduces vinyli-
dene dibromides to vinyl bromides.2e However, the
trichloromethyl derivatives did not undergo any further
reduction beyond vinylidene dichlorides even with 3
equiv. of indium and longer periods of reflux. These
reductions are very selective not reducing Cl (entries 9,
10, 21) or Br (entry 19) functionalities attached to the
aromatic rings. Moreover, double bonds (CꢀC) (entries
2, 4) also remained unaffected during these reductions.
11149; (e) Chauhan, K. K.; Frost, C. G. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1 2000, 3015; (f) Ranu, B. C. Eur. J. Org.
Chem. 2000, 2343.
2. (a) Ranu, B. C.; Dutta, J.; Guchhait, S. K. J. Org. Chem.
2001, 66, 5624; (b) Ranu, B. C.; Dutta, J.; Guchhait, S. K.
Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2603; (c) Ranu, B. C.; Dutta, P.;
Sarkar, A. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1999, 1139; (d)
Ranu, B. C.; Guchhait, S. K.; Sarkar, A. Chem. Commun.
1998, 2113; (e) Ranu, B. C.; Samanta, S.; Guchhait, S. K.
J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 4102.
3. (a) Moody, C. J.; Pitts, M. R. Synlett 1998, 1028; (b)
Moody, C. J.; Pitts, M. R. Synlett 1998, 1029; (c) Reddy,
G. V.; Rao, G. V.; Iyenger, D. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999,
40, 3937; (d) Chae, H.; Cho, S.; Keum, G.; Kang, S. B.;
Pae, A. N.; Kim, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 3899; (e)
Pitts, M. R.; Harrison, J. R.; Moody, C. J. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1 2001, 955 and References cited therein.
4. General experimental procedure for the reduction of
acetates, mesylates and tosylates of trichloro- and tribro-
momethyl carbinols. Representative procedure for the reduc-
tion
of
2-phenyl-2-tosyloxy-1,1,1,-trichloroethane
to
1,1-dichloro-2-phenylethene. A solution of 2-phenyl-2-tosy-
loxy-1,1,1-trichloroethane (380 mg, 1 mmol) in DMF (2
mL) was heated under reflux at 150–160°C with indium
metal (115 mg, 1 mmol, cut into small pieces) under
nitrogen for 3 h (TLC). The reaction mixture was then
quenched with a saturated solution of ammonium chloride
and extracted with ether (3×10 mL). The ether extract was
washed with brine, dried (Na2SO4) and evaporated to
leave the crude product which was purified by column
chromatography over silica gel [eluted with hexane–ether
(9:1) solvent system] to furnish 1,1-dichloro-2-
phenylethene as a colourless oil (163 mg, 94%). The IR, 1H
and 13C NMR spectral data of this compound were found
to be identical with those reported.7 This procedure has
been followed for the reduction of all the other trihalides
listed in Table 1. All the products have been characterized
by IR, 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy and elemental
analyses.
In conclusion, the present procedure using indium
metal provides a highly selective reduction of acetates,
mesylates and tosylates of aryl-substituted tri-
halomethyl carbinols to the corresponding vinylidene
dihalides which are useful intermediates in organic syn-
thesis.5 The high yield, considerably fast reaction and
compatibility with other reducible functional groups
make this procedure a practical alternative to existing
ones.6,7 Furthermore, this procedure also broadens the
scope of reductions by indium metal.
Acknowledgements
We are pleased to acknowledge the financial support
from CSIR, New Delhi, India [Grant No. 01(1739)/02]
for this investigation. S.S. and A.D. are also thankful
to CSIR for their fellowships.
5. (a) Ramirej, F.; Desai, N. B.; McKelvie, N. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1962, 84, 1745; (b) Corey, E. J.; Fuchs, P. L. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 1972, 13, 3769.
6. (a) Takai, K.; Kokumai, R.; Nobunaka, T. Chem. Com-
mun. 2001, 1128; (b) Wang, Z.; Campagna, S.; Xu, G.;
Pierce, J. M. F.; Confalone, P. N. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000,
41, 4007 and References cited therein; (c) Hosomi, A.;
Inaba, M.; Sakurai, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 4727.
7. Aggarwal, V. K.; Merell, A. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 7211.
References
1. (a) Li, C.-J. Chem. Rev. 1993, 93, 2023; (b) Cintas, P.
Synlett 1995, 1087; (c) Li, C.-J. Tetrahedron 1996, 52,
5643; (d) Li, C.-J.; Chan, T.-H. Tetrahedron 1999, 55,