C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Scheme 1
oxygenation of iron-dithiolates by molecular oxygen and stabilizes
the S-bonded monosulfinate iron species, as observed in the inactive,
NO-bound form of the Fe-NHase, and the iron-NO-sulfinate
species exhibit the photolabilization of sulfur-bound [O] moiety
under mild conditions. Studies of the NO/Fe oxidation state(s) of
this series of {Fe(NO)}6-type iron-NO-sulfinate species by XAS,19
the influence of {Fe(NO)}n electronic structure on the Fe-N-O
bond angle as well as sulfinate ligand(s) on the electronic
environment of iron center,19 the effect of S atom electron density
on the sulfur oxygenation of the analogous iron-thiolate-nitrosyl
compounds, and mechanistic studies of sulfur oxygenation are
ongoing.20
Acknowledgment. We greatly acknowledge financial support
from the National Science Council (Taiwan).
Supporting Information Available: Crystallographic data in CIF
format and additional figures and experimental details (PDF). This
References
at 497 nm disappeared with the formation of two intense absorption
bands at 525 and 980 nm. The H NMR spectrum of complex 3,
(1) (a) Kobayashi, M.; Shimizu, S. Nat. Biotechnol. 1998, 16, 733-736. (b)
Kobayashi, M.; Nagasawa, T.; Yamada, H. Trends Biotechnol. 1992, 10,
402-408.
1
showing the expected signals for the [S,SO2-C6H4] and [S,S-C6H4]
ligands, is consistent with a diamagnetic species.15 The electro-
chemistry of complex 3, measured in CH3CN with 0.1 M [n-Bu4N]-
[PF6] as supporting electrolyte (scan rate 100 mV/s), reveals two
quasi-reversible oxidation-reduction processes at -0.62 and -1.21
(2) Brennan, B. A.; Alms, G.; Nelson, M. J.; Durney, L. T.; Scarrow, R. C.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 9194.
(3) Sugiura, Y.; Kuwahara, J.; Nagasawa, T.; Yamada, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1987, 109, 5848-5850.
(4) (a) Nagashima, S.; Nakasako, M.; Dohmae, N.; Tsujimura, M.; Takio,
K.; Odaka, M.; Yohda, M.; Kamiya, N.; Endo, I. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1998,
5, 347-351. (b) Huang, W.; Jia, J.; Cummings, J.; Nelson, M.; Schneider,
G.; Lindqvist, Y. Structure 1997, 5, 691-699.
V (E1/2) (vs Ag/AgClO4), as compared to -0.81 and -1.16 V (E1/2
)
for complex 2.13
(5) (a) Noguchi, T. Hoshino, M.; Tsujimura, M.; Odaka, M.; Inoue, Y.; Endo,
I. Biochemistry 1996, 35, 16777-16781. (b) Odaka, M.; Fujii, K.; Hoshino,
M.; Noguchi, T.; Tsujimura, M.; Nagashima, S.; Yohda, M.; Nagamune,
T.; Inoue, Y.; Endo, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 3785-3791.
(6) Scarrow, R. C.; Stickler, B. S.; Ellison, J. J.; Shoner, S. C.; Kovacs, J.
A.; Cummings, J. C.; Nelson, M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 9237-
9245.
The S-bonded monosulfinate complex 3 undergoes oxygen
transfer reaction in THF/CH2Cl2 solution with 2 equiv of PPh3
(expected to be O-atom abstracting agent) over the course of 5 days
to yield complex 2 and triphenylphosphine oxide identified by 31
P
NMR spectroscopy (Scheme 1b′).16 The conversion of complex 3
to complex 2 was also displayed when CH2Cl2 solution (10 mL)
of complex 3 (0.05 mmol) was photolyzed under N2 purge at
ambient temperature for 60 min; the shift in electronic absorptions
at 525 and 980 nm to 497 nm is accompanied by a change in color
of the solution from purple to dark reddish brown which is in accord
with the formation of complex 2 (Scheme 1b′). During this
transformation, no intermediate was detected spectrally. The
reversibility of [O] atom binding demonstrates that complexes 2
and 3 are photochemically interconvertible.17
Subsequent reaction of complex 3 (0.939 g, 1 mmol) with [PPN]-
[NO2] (0.584 g, 1 mmol) in the presence of O2 in THF/CH2Cl2
(1:1 ratio) for 10 days at room temperature, as shown in Scheme
1c, produced the dark blue, thermally unstable dimeric bis(sulfinate)
[PPN]2[(NO)Fe(SO2,SO2-C6H4)(S,S-C6H4)]2 (4) crystals (yield 3%)
after washed with THF and recrystallized from CH2Cl2.18 Complex
4 displayed three distinct peaks at 1212, 1067, 1057 cm-1 (KBr)
in the IR ν(SO) spectrum, consistent with the presence of
bis(sulfinate) groups coordinated to iron.16
Structures of complexes 3 and 4 are presented in Figures 1 and
2, respectively. Analysis of the bond angles for complexes 2 and 3
reveals that iron is best described as existing in a distorted trigonal
bipyramidal coordination environment with NO and sulfinate groups
occupying equatorial and axial positions, respectively, in complex
3, whereas the distorted square pyramidal geometry is adopted in
complex 2. Consistent with other published transition-metal sulfinate
complexes,13 the S-O bond lengths average to ca. 1.464(2) and
1.462(2) Å in complexes 3 and 4, respectively. The O‚‚‚O distance
is measured at 2.468 Å, while the S(1)‚‚‚S(2) distance is 3.072 Å
(S(1)‚‚‚S(3), 3.030 Å) in complex 3.
(7) (a) Shearer, J.; Kung, I. Y.; Lovell, S.; Kaminsky, W.; Kovacs, J. A. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 463-468. (b) Kung, I.; Schweitzer, D.;
Shearer, J.; Taylor, W. D.; Jackson, H. L.; Lovell, S.; Kovacs, J. A. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 8299-8300.
(8) Noveron, J. C.; Olmstead, M. M.; Mascharak, P. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2001, 123, 3247-3259.
(9) Noguchi, T.; Honda, J.; Nagamune, T.; Sasabe, H.; Inoue, Y.; Endo, I.
FEBS Lett. 1995, 358, 9-12.
(10) Liaw, W.-F.; Lee, N.-H.; Chen, C.-H.; Lee, C.-M.; Lee, G.-H.; Peng, S.-
M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 488.
(11) Complex 1: 1H NMR (CD2Cl2): δ 3.84 (br), 1.98 (br) (C4H8O), -3.01
(br), -36.79 (br) (S,S-C6H4) ppm. Absorption spectrum (THF) [λmax, nm
(ꢀ, M-1 cm-1)]: 560(11469), 360(16658), 329(17441), 302(17991). Anal.
Calcd for C52H46ONP2S4Fe: C, 65.96; H, 4.90; N, 1.48. Found: C, 66.31;
H, 4.92; N, 1.79.
(12) Complex 2: IR: 1789 s (THF) (νNO) cm-1 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 6.87
.
(m), 7.55 (m) (S,S-C6H4) ppm. Absorption spectrum (THF) [λmax, nm (ꢀ,
M-1 cm-1)]: 320(34925), 497(4400), 610(1010). Anal. Calcd for C48H38
-
ON2P2S4Fe: C, 63.71; H, 4.23; N, 3.09. Found: C, 63.49; H, 4.70; N,
3.38. The X-ray structure of 2 will be published in the full report.
(13) Grapperhaus, C. A.; Darensbourg, M. Y. Acc. Chem. Res. 1998, 31, 451-
459.
(14) Kumar, M.; Colpas, G. J.; Day, R. O.; Maroney, M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1989, 111, 8323-8325.
(15) Complex 3: IR: 1789 s (THF), 1791 s (CH2Cl2) (νNO); 1779 (KBr) (νNO),
1196, 1060 (KBr) (νSO) cm-1 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 8.026 (dd), 7.765
.
(d), 7.17 (dd), 7.08 (t), 6.985 (t) (S,S-C6H4, S, S(O)2-C6H4) ppm.
Absorption spectrum (THF) [λmax, nm (ꢀ, M-1 cm-1)]: 312(23829), 525-
(4750), 625sh(2600), 980(3900). Anal. Calcd for C48H38O3N2P2S4Fe: C,
61.54; H, 4.09; N, 2.99. Found: C, 62.28; H, 4.37; N, 3.15.
(16) Buonomo, R. M.; Font, I.; Maguire, M. J.; Reibenspies, J. H.; Tuntulani,
T.; Darensbourg, M. Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 963-973.
(17) Patra, A. K.; Afshar, R.; Olmstead, M. M.; Mascharak, P. K. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2512-2515.
(18) Complex 4: IR: 1862 (νNO), 1212, 1067, 1057 (νSO) (KBr) cm-1. Anal.
Calcd for C96H76O10N4P4S8Fe2: C, 59.505; H, 3.953; N, 2.891. Found:
C, 60.20; H, 4.37; N, 2.60.
(19) (a) Popescu, V.-C.; Munck, E.; Fox, B. G.; Sanakis, Y.; Cummings, J.
G.; Turner, I. M., Jr.; Nelson, M. J. Biochemistry 2001, 40, 7984-7991.
(b) Enemark, J. H.; Feltham, R. D. Coord. Chem. ReV. 1974, 13, 339-
406.
(20) Feig, A. L.; Bautista, M. T.; Lippard, S. J. Inorg. Chem. 1996, 35,
6892-6898.
In summary, the results obtained from this work implicate that
binding of one NO molecule to the Fe center promotes sulfur
JA035292T
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 125, NO. 38, 2003 11493