Communications
À
coordinated water by indene, as a result of weakening the Pd
À
OH2 or Pt OH2 bond; a similar effect has been reported in
related systems.[8] Thus, under acidic conditions, both 2a and
À
2b effect C H activation by the same pathway: rate-limiting
À
coordination of substrate followed by rapid C H activation.
The reaction of 2b with indene is not inhibited by water,
indicating that substitution of coordinated water by indene is
associative. On the other hand, addition of greater than
50 equivalents of water causes an increase in the rate.[7]
Analysis of the 1H NMR spectrum (in the absence of
indene) reveals that, as the quantity of free water is increased,
resonances corresponding to the hydroxy-bridged dimer 1b
are detected along with those of 2b. Thus, at high concen-
trations, it appears that water is a sufficiently strong base to
deprotonate 2b and establish an equilibrium between 1b and
2b. When such a solution is treated with indene, the
resonances for 1b disappear significantly faster than those
for 2b, as resonance peaks corresponding to the indenyl
species 4b emerge. These results imply that there is a direct
Figure 1. Graph of ([4b]endÀ[4b])0.5 against time during the reaction of
1b with 40 equivalents of indene in CH2Cl2/TFE (5.5:1 mixture,
675 equivalents of TFE). [4b]end =final concentration of product 4b.[7]
À
pathway for C H activation with 1b that does not involve 2b
as an intermediate, in contrast to the platinum analogue 1a.
Addition of stronger bases, such as 2,6-lutidine, triethyl-
amine, or 1,8-bis(dimethylamino)naphthalene, to solutions of
2b results in rapid and complete deprotonation to 1b.[7] When
these deprotonation reactions were attempted on a prepara-
tive scale, the protonated amine could not be cleanly
separated from the product. However, the use of a solid-
supported base, polystyrene-bound diethylamine, allowed the
isolation of pure 1b in 85% yield [Eq. (2)],[7] representing a
significant improvement on the previous method.[3,4]
À
Scheme 2. Proposed mechanism for palladium-catalyzed C H bond
activation of indene by 1b. Ar=3,5-tBu2C6H3, solv=MeOH or TFE.
À
coordinated solvent by indene, and finally by fast C H
activation. The rate-determining step, indicated by the
detected first-order indene-concentration dependence and
also the absence of a detectable p-bound indene intermediate,
also explains why the reaction is faster for 1b than for
dications 2a and 2b, as water is probably more tightly bound
to the dicationic center in the latter, thus slowing displace-
ment, whereas TFE or methanol bound to the monocationic
monomer generated from 1b would be more readily dis-
placed.[10]
A solution of 1b in CH2Cl2 reacted with indene to form 4b
even at room temperature, albeit very slowly (t1/2 ꢀ 3 days).
Addition of a small amount of TFE or MeOH (typically a 6:1
ratio of CH2Cl2 to the alcohol) results in a dramatic increase
in rate (t1/2 ꢀ 5 min). A smaller increase in rate is obtained by
adding THF, pentafluoropyridine, or even water (t1/2 ꢀ 1 day),
but those reactions give lower yields and more impurities. In
contrast, 1a, 2a, and 2b all require elevated temperatures to
react with indene at an appreciable rate.
The kinetic isotope effect (KIE) for the conversion of
1,1,3-trideuteroindene[11] into the deuterated indenyl complex
[D2]-4b was determined by comparing rate constants for
parallel reactions, which reveals a value of kH/kD = 1.6(1).
This value is slightly larger than expected for rate-determin-
ing p coordination of indene (kH/kD ꢀ 1) but significantly
The kinetics for the reaction of 1b with varying concen-
trations of indene and TFE (or MeOH, when it was used as
1
additive) were determined using both H NMR and UV/Vis
À
spectroscopy. The results reveal half-order dependence on Pd
concentration (Figure 1) and first-order dependence on both
indene and TFE (or MeOH) concentrations.[7] These findings
are consistent with the mechanism shown in Scheme 2,
consisting of an equilibrium involving the fast, solvent-
assisted separation of 1b into two monocationic monomers[9]
(which explains both the half-order Pd-concentration depend-
ence and the substantial increase in rate when TFE or MeOH
is added), followed by the rate-determining displacement of
lower than would be expected for rate-determining C H
activation (kH/kD ꢀ 3.5–6). Previously, we have tentatively
postulated that KIE values of around 2 (detected for similar
À
C H activation reactions with other {Pt(diimine)} systems)
À
indicate that neither coordination of the substrate nor C H
activation is completely rate-determining, and the measured
KIE reflects both steps.[12] That possibility cannot be dis-
À
counted in this case, although it is clear that C H activation is
not entirely rate determining.
ꢀ 2008 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 9941 –9943