8152
A. S. Kende et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 46 (2005) 8149–8152
warm to 0 °C. After 1 h, the reaction mixture was
16. Heck, R. F. Acc. Chem. Res. 1979, 12, 146–151; Sato, Y.;
Honda, T.; Shibasaki, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33,
2593–2596, see also Ref. 3c.
quenched with an aqueous saturated solution of sodium
bicarbonate, extracted with hexanes, and the organic layer
washed with an aqueous saturated solution of sodium
bicarbonate and brine. The crude yellow oil was purified
by chromatography (silica gel treated with 1% triethyl-
amine in hexanes, 100% hexanes).
17. Spectroscopic data for 19 (1H, 13C NMR, IR, and MS)
were in accord with those of an authentic sample
independently synthesized according to the following
procedures: Oppolzer, W.; Snowden, R. L.; Simmons, D.
P. Helv. Chim. Acta 1981, 64, 2002–2021; Gras, J.-L.;
Bertrand, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1979, 4549–4552.
18. Spectroscopic data (1H, 13C NMR, and IR) for 20 were in
agreement with literature data: Jones, J. B.; Dodds, D. R.
Can. J. Chem. 1987, 65, 2397–2404.
9. Schreiber, S. L.; Hawley, R. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26,
5971–5974.
10. Silylations of the macrolactones were carried out with
HMPA (1.1 equiv) instead of DMPU. The lithium enolate
was trapped with TBDMSCl (1.1 equiv) and slowly
warmed to room temperature. After chromatography,
the very unstable ketene acetals 5 and 6 were used
immediately in the palladium(II) reactions.
19. Spectroscopic data for 21: 1H NMR (CDCl3): d 1.85–2.00
(m, 2H), 2.22–2.30 (m, 2H), 4.20–4.25 (m, 2H), 5.45–5.55
(m, 2H), 5.92 (d, 1H, J = 11 Hz), 6.41–6.50 (m, 1H). GC/
MS (m/e, 70 eV): M+ = 138 (9%), 121, 110, 91, 80, 79
(100%), 68, 53, 41.
11. Cyclizations were typically carried out by addition of a
solution of silyl enol ether in acetonitrile/dichlorometh-
ane, to a solution of palladium acetate (1.0 equiv) in
acetonitrile. After stirring for 16 h under argon at room
temperature, the black solution was evaporated to dryness
under reduced pressure, diluted with hexanes, and filtered
through a plug of Florisil. The filtrate was concentrated,
and the resulting yellow oil purified by chromatography
(silica gel, gradient hexanes 100%—hexanes–ethyl acetate
9:1).
1
20. Spectroscopic data for 22: H NMR (CDCl3): d 1.27 (m,
1H), 1.55 (m, 1H), 1.70–1.80 (m, 2H), 1.95 (m, 1H), 2.17
(m, 2H), 2.31 (m, 1H), 2.69 (m, 1H), 3.15 (m, 1H), 5.66
(dd, 1H, J = 6.1 Hz), 6.40 (d, 1H, J = 6.1 Hz). IR (CHCl3
solution): 2945, 2840–2920, 1740, 1120 cmÀ1. MS (m/e,
70 eV): M+ = 152, 124, 109, 95, 83, 81, 69, 68, 67.
21. The chemical shifts and coupling constants of the vinylic
protons of 22 as well as the infrared maximum for the
carbonyl groupwere consistent with literature data:
12. Spectroscopic data (1H, 13C NMR, and MS) of cycliza-
tion product 14 were identical to those from an authentic
sample obtained during the preparation of the substrate
2.
´
Astudillo, L.; Galindo, A.; Gonzalez, A. G.; Mansilla,
H. Heterocycles 1993, 36, 1075–1080.
22. Ayral-Kaloustian, S.; Wolff, S.; Agosta, W. C. J. Org.
Chem. 1978, 43, 3314–3318.
23. For the preparation of ketone 24, see: Boeckman, R. K.,
Jr. Tetrahedron Lett. 1977, 4281–4284.
24. The compound 23 was obtained in two steps from 24, first
by generating the kinetic enolate of 24 with LDA
(1.2 equiv) in dry THF and trapping with TMSCl
(1.2 equiv), and then by the same oxidative degradation
used to transform 22 to 23, with an overall yield of 39%.
13. Spectroscopic data (1H, 13C NMR, IR, and MS) for 15
were in agreement with literature data: Redmond, K.;
Carpenter, B. K. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 5668–5669;
Hudlicky, T.; Koszyk, F. J.; Dochwat, D. M.; Cantrell, G.
L. J. Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 2911–2915.
14. Kende, A. S.; Wustrow, D. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26,
5411–5414.
15. For an alternative mechanistic picture, see Ref. 3c.