Enzymatic Kinetic Resolution of Primary Amines
The racemization process involves reversible H-abstraction at
the chiral center in position R relative to the NH2 group.8 The
rate constant for the limiting step, that is, bimolecular hydrogen
abstraction by alkylthiyl radical from aliphatic amines was
estimated to be 104 M-1 s-1 at 80 °C.8 The thermally initiated
racemization carried out in the presence of AIBN proceeds
through a chain mechanism. To be efficient, the reaction has to
be performed at a temperature close to 80 °C. Thereby, the
performance of a highly selective enzymatic resolution at 80 °C
was of paramount importance to optimize the DKR process.
We report in this article the detailed study of kinetic resolution
optimization that enabled the performance of the above-cited
dynamic kinetic resolutions of aliphatic amines.5 The screening
of selected acyl donors was achieved with the purpose to
improve the kinetic resolution of primary aliphatic amines using
the immobilized CAL-B catalyst (Novozym 435 from Novo
Nordisk A/S, Denmark) at 80 °C. 2-Amino-4-phenyl-butane (1)
was chosen as model for this study, the best conditions were
then applied to a series of aliphatic and benzylic amines.
aminolysis have been performed by Gotor,10 Sheldon,11 and
other groups.12-14 Improving the lipase catalytic activity and
selectivity can be made by changing the solvent,14 or the acyl
donor,15 or both. The lipase-catalyzed resolution of racemic
amines is reputedly successful in organic solvent of low
polarity.14 Since the final goal behind this study was to carry
out DKR reactions under optimal conditions,5 the enzymatic
resolution was optimized in heptane (one of the best solvents
for the radical-mediated racemization) despite the rather poor
results reported for CAL-B-mediated acylations in hexane16 or
cyclohexane.14c,15c
The selection of appropriate acyl donors is crucial for the
kinetic resolution of amines.2b,15,16 Although they are highly
reactive irreversible acyl donors, enol ethers are not suitable
for this purpose, since they release carbonyl compounds that
may react with the aminogroup to form imines. Furthermore,
since amines are good nucleophiles, highly reactive acyl donors
might lead to amides through spontaneous nonenzymatic
nucleophilic displacement by the racemic substrate, which would
lower the enantiomeric excess of the acylated product. Carbon-
ates have been used as acyl donors for the resolution of amines,
since they lead to carbamates from which amines are easily
recovered. A preliminary trial was carried out in the presence
of 1 equiv of diallylcarbonate. At 80 °C, 64% conversion was
reached in 7.5 h, and the reaction led to rather low enantiomeric
excesses for both the remaining amine (S)-1 (46% eeS, 39%
yield) and the corresponding (R)-carbamate (26% eeR, 71%
yield). Even though at 80 °C spontaneous aminolysis was shown
not to interfere with the enzymatic reaction, this family of acyl
donors was discarded, and further assays were limited to ethyl
esters and corresponding acids.
Results and Discussion
The thermostable lipase B from Candida antartica (CAL-B)
has proven to be the most effective biocatalyst for aminolysis
reactions in organic solvents.9 Numerous studies of enzymatic
(5) Gastaldi, S.; Escoubet, S.; Vanthuyne, N.; Gil, G.; Bertrand, M. P.
Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 837-839.
(6) For deracemization, see: Soda, K.; Oikawa, T.; Yokoigawa, K. J.
Mol. Catal. B: Enzym. 2001, 11, 149-153. (b) Turner, N. J. Curr. Opin.
Biotechnol. 2003, 14, 401-406. (c) Gruber, C. C.; Lavandera, I.; Faber,
K.; Kroutil, W. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2006, 348, 1789-1805. (d) Dunsmore,
C. J.; Carr, R.; Fleming, T.; Turner, N. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128,
2224-2225. (e) Turner, N. J. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2004, 8, 114-119.
(7) For examples, see: (a) Uematsu, N.; Fujii, A.; Hashigushi, S.; Ikariya,
T.; Noyori, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 4916-4917. (b) Mao, J.; Baker,
D. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 841-843. (c) Kobayashi, S.; Kobayashi, S.; Ishitani,
H. Chem. ReV. 1999, 99, 1069-1094. (d) Hansen, M. C.; Buchwald, S.
Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 713-715. (e) Trifonova, A.; Diesen, J. S.; Chapman,
C. J.; Andersson, P. G. S. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 3825-3827. (f) Bra¨se, S.;
Baumann, T.; Dahmen, S.; Vogt, H. Chem. Comm. 2007, 1881-1890.
(8) (a) Escoubet, S.; Gastaldi, S.; Vanthuyne, N.; Gil, G.; Siri, D.;
Bertrand, M. P. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 7288-7292. (b) Escoubet, S.;
Gastaldi, S.; Vanthuyne, N.; Gil, G.; Siri, D.; Bertrand, M. P. Eur. J. Org.
Chem. 2006, 3242-3250.
Comparative results obtained with racemic amine (1) are
given in Table 1.
We first used simple esters, the most common one being ethyl
acetate (entry 1). At 80 °C, ethyl acetate led to 50% conversion
in 7 h, but the enantiomeric excesses did not exceed 91% for
(R)-amide 1a and 92% for the remaining (S)-amine 1.17 The
enantioselectivity was the lowest in the series.
(12) (a) Skupinska, K. A.; McEachern, E. J.; Baird, I. R.; Skerlj. R. T.;
Bridger, G. J. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 3546-3551. (b) Davis, B. A.; Durden,
D. A. Synth. Commun. 2001, 31, 569-578. (c) O¨ hrner, N.; Orrenius, C.;
Mattason, A.; Norin, T.; Hult, K. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1996, 19, 328-
331. (d) Conde, S.; Lo´pez-Serrano, P. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 922-929.
(e) Reeve, C. D. WO 99/31264. (f) Baldessari, A.; Mangone, C. P. J. Mol.
Catal. B: Enzym. 2001, 11, 335-341. (g) Yang, B.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, S.;
Izumi, T. Indian J. Chem. 2005, 44B, 1312-1316.
(9) (a) Gotor-Ferna´ndez, V.; Busto, E.; Gotor, V. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2006,
348, 797-812. (b) Gotor-Ferna´ndez, V.; Gotor, V. Curr. Org. Chem. 2006,
10, 1125-1143. (c) Alfonso, I.; Gotor, V. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2004, 33, 201-
209. (d) van Rantwijk, F.; Sheldon, R. A. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 501-
519.
(10) (a) Gotor-Ferna´ndez, V.; Ferna´ndez-Torres, P.; Gotor, V. Tetrahe-
dron: Asymmetry 2006, 17, 2558-2564. (b) Gonza´lez-Sab´ın, J.; Gotor,
V.; Rebolledo, F. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 1309-1314. (c) Gonza´lez-Sab´ın,
J.; Lavandera, I.; Rebolledo, F.; Gotor, V. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2006,
17, 1264-1274. (d) Gonza´lez-Sab´ın, J.; Gotor, V.; Rebolledo, F. Tetrahe-
dron: Asymmetry 2005, 16, 3070-3076. (e) Gonza´lez-Sab´ın, J.; Gotor,
V.; Rebolledo, F. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2004, 15, 481-488. (f)
Gonza´lez-Sab´ın, J.; Gotor, V.; Rebolledo, F. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2002,
13, 1315-1320. (g) Garc´ıa-Urdiales, E.; Rebolledo, F.; Gotor, V. Tetra-
hedron: Asymmetry 2000, 11, 1459-1463. (h) Iglesias, L. E.; Sa´nchez, V.
M.; Rebolledo, F.; Gotor, V. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1997, 8, 2675-
2677. (i) Sa´nchez, V. M.; Rebolledo, F.; Gotor, V. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
1997, 8, 37-40.
(11) (a) Toral, A. R.; de los R´ıos, A. P; Herna´ndez, F. J.; Janssen, M.
H. A.; Schoevaart, R.; van Rantwijk, F.; Sheldon, R. A. Enzyme Microb.
Technol. 2007, 40, 1095-1099. (b) Youshko, M. I.; van Rantwijk, F.;
Sheldon, R. A. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2001, 12, 3267-3271. (c) Hacking,
M. A. P. J.; van Rantwijk, F.; Sheldon, R. A. J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym.
2000, 9, 201-208. (d) van Langen, L. M.; Oosthoek, N. H. P.; Guranda,
D. T.; van Rantwijk, F.; Sˇvedas, V. K.; Sheldon, R. A. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 2000, 11, 4593-4600. (e) Zoete, M. C.; Kock-van Dalen, A.
C.; van Rantwijk, F.; Sheldon, R. A. J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym. 1996, 1,
109-113.
(13) (a) Breen, G. F. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2004, 15, 1427-1430.
(b) Sharma, J.; Batovska, D.; Kuwamori, Y.; Asano, Y. J. Biosci. Bioeng.
2005, 100, 662-666.
(14) (a) Carrea, G.; Riva, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 2226-
2254. (b) Klibanov, A. M. Nature 2001, 409, 241-246. (c) Kitaguchi, H.;
Fitzpatrick, P. A.; Huber, J. E.; Klibanov, A. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989,
111, 3094-3095. (d) Re´jasse, B.; BessonEn, T.; Legoy, M.-D.; Lamare, S.
Org. Biomol. Chem. 2006, 4, 3703-3707. (e) Lozano, P.; de Diego, T.;
Carrie´, D.; Vaultier, M.; Iborra, J. L. Chem. Commun. 2002, 692-693.
(15) (a) Hanefeld, U. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003, 1, 2405-2415. (b)
Takayama, S.; Lee, S. T.; Hung, S.-C.; Wong, C.-H. Chem. Commun. 1999,
127-128. (c) Goswami, A.; Guo, Z.; Parker, W. L.; Patel, R. N.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2005, 16, 1715-1719. (d) Cammenberg, M.; Hult,
K.; Park, S. ChemBioChem 2006, 7, 1745-1749. (e) Ottoson, K.; Hult, J.
J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym. 2001, 11, 1025-1028. (f) Quan, J.; Wang, N.;
Cai, X.-Q.; Wu, Q.; Lin, X.-F. J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym. 2007, 44, 1-7.
(16) Puertas, S.; Brieva, R.; Rebolledo, F.; Gotor, V. Tetrahedron 1995,
51, 1495-1502.
(17) The absolute configuration of the remaining amine and the amides
were assigned by analogy with literature data (ref 10f), in agreement with
Kazlauskas’ empirical rule (ref 22).
(18) Chen, C. S.; Fujimoto, Y.; Girdaukas, C. J.; Sih, C. J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1982, 104, 7294-7297.
J. Org. Chem, Vol. 72, No. 18, 2007 6919