Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42, 6592−6594
Titanium and Zirconium Amido Complexes Ligated by
2,2′-Di(3-methylindolyl)methanes: Synthesis, Characterization, and
Ethylene Polymerization Activity
Mark R. Mason,* Bassam N. Fneich, and Kristin Kirschbaum
Department of Chemistry, MS 602, UniVersity of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio 43606
Received June 24, 2003
2,2′-Di(3-methylindolyl)methanes (L H ) are introduced as dianionic,
coordination and M-N-M bridging, and reduced NfM
2
2
π-donation. These properties are attributable to the high
electronegativity of nitrogen, significantly enhanced by
extensive delocalization of the nitrogen lone pair into the
aromatic π system and onto the indolyl carbons. Delocal-
ization reduces the availability of the nitrogen lone pair for
π-donation to the metal and also limits M-N-M bridging
capability.
Surprisingly, 2,2′-diindolylmethanes and related 2,2′,2′′-
triindolylmethanes are unexplored as ligands for main group
and transition elements, aside from our recent work on these
readily synthesized compounds.1 We recently demonstrated
bidentate coordination of 1a-c to aluminum, boron, and
silicon,1 and showed that tri(3-methylindol-2-yl)methane is
an effective framework for the construction of the very bulky
and π-acidic phosphine 2.6,7
bidentate ligands of reduced π-donating ability. Four complexes
of the type L Ti(NEt2)2 and L Zr(NEt2)2(THF) have been synthesized
2
2
and characterized by elemental analysis, NMR (1H, 13C) spectros-
copy, and X-ray crystallography. Structural data confirm the reduced
π-donating ability of the η1-indolyl moiety compared to that of
diethylamido. Preliminary catalytic activities of these group 4
complexes for the polymerization of ethylene are reported.
Numerous 2,2′-diindolylmethanes are reported in the
literature that could serve as bidentate or, for those with an
additional ligating substituent, tridentate ligands for transition
and main group elements.1 Deprotonated 2,2′-diindolyl-
methanes can be regarded as dianionic analogues of scor-
pionate bis(pyrazolyl)borate ligands,2 although with greater
steric requirement. In addition, 2,2′-diindolylmethanes are
appealing ligand candidates since pyrrolyl,3-5 indolyl,1,6-8
and carbazolyl9 groups are now recognized to impart
significantly different electronic and steric properties to
complexes of main group and transition metals than those
offered by traditional amido ligands. Specific advantages of
indolyl ligands include strong electron-withdrawing ability
when bound in an η1-N mode, reduced tendency for η5
Here we introduce deprotonated 2,2′-di(3-methylindolyl)-
arylmethanes 1a and 1b as dianionic, bidentate ligands of
reduced π-donating ability for applications to the coordina-
tion chemistry of transition metals. Representative diethyl-
amido complexes of titanium and zirconium are reported,
along with their catalytic activities for the polymerization
of ethylene.
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mmason5@
uoft02.utoledo.edu.
(1) For an overview, see: Mason, M. R. Chemtracts 2003, 16, 272.
(2) Trofimenko, S. Chem. ReV. 1993, 93, 943.
(3) Moloy, K. G.; Petersen, J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 7696.
(4) (a) Shi, Y.; Hall, C.; Ciszewski, J. T.; Cao, C.; Odom, A. L. Chem.
Commun. 2003, 586. (b) Li, Y.; Turnas, A.; Ciszewski, J. T.; Odom,
A. L. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 6298. (c) Harris, S. A.; Ciszewski, J.
T.; Odom, A. L. Inorg. Chem. 2001, 40, 1987.
(5) For examples, see: (a) Korobkov, I.; Gambarotta, S.; Yap, G. P. A.
Organometallics 2001, 20, 2552. (b) Ganesan, M.; Lalonde, M. P.;
Gambarotta, S.; Yap, G. P. A. Organometallics 2001, 20, 2443. (c)
Dube, T.; Gambarotta, S.; Yap, G. Organometallics 2000, 19, 121.
(d) Dube, T.; Gambarotta, S.; Yap, G. P. A. Organometallics 2000,
19, 817. (e) Dube, T.; Gambarotta, S.; Yap, G. P. A. Organometallics
2000, 19, 115.
Reactions of Ti(NEt2)410 with 1a11,12 and 1b12 in refluxing
toluene, followed by concentration of the reaction solutions
and cooling at -20 °C overnight, yielded brick red crystals
1
of 3a and 3b, respectively (eq 1). The H and 13C NMR
(6) Barnard, T. S.; Mason, M. R. Organometallics 2001, 20, 206.
(7) Barnard, T. S.; Mason, M. R. Inorg. Chem. 2001, 40, 5001.
(8) Tanski, J. M.; Parkin, G. Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42, 264.
(9) Riley, P. N.; Fanwick, P. E.; Rothwell, I. P. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton
Trans. 2001, 181.
(10) (a) Bradley, D. C.; Thomas, I. M. J. Chem. Soc. 1960, 3857. (b)
Steinborn, D.; Wagner, I.; Taube, R. Synthesis 1989, 4, 304.
(11) Dostal, V. Chem. Listy 1938, 32, 13; Chem. Abstr. 1938, 32, 5399.
(12) Mason, M. R.; Barnard, T. S.; Segla, M. F.; Xie, B.; Kirschbaum, K.
J. Chem. Crystallogr. 2003, 33, 531.
6592 Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 42, No. 21, 2003
10.1021/ic0347236 CCC: $25.00 © 2003 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 09/25/2003