1874
I. Vilotijevic et al.
SHORT PAPER
Figure 2 The three lowest energy conformations of 6
13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): = 212.1, 133.9, 129.5 (2 C), 128.6 (2
C), 127.0, 81.3, 42.6, 37.8 (2 C), 29.1 (2 C), 23.1 (2 C)
13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): = 216.8, 135.5, 131.0, 130.5, 130.4,
128.5 (2 C), 127.1 (2 C), 82.3, 46.4, 42.8, 37.4, 22.0, 21.9.
ES HRMS: m/z calcd for C15H20O2Na (M + Na)+: 255.1355; found:
ES HRMS: m/z calcd for C15H18O2Na (M + Na)+: 253.1199; found:
255.1360.
253.1208.
Compound 9
Hydrogenation of 9
Colorless oil.
IR (neat) 3464, 1706 cm–1.
1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): = 7.36–7.18 (m, 5 H), 5.87–5.84 (m,
2 H), 3.89 (s, 2 H), 3.41 (br s, 1 H), 2.61–2.52 (m, 2 H), 2.16–2.08
(m, 2 H), 1.97–1.88 (m, 2 H), 1.62–1.55 (m, 2 H).
13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): = 211.2, 133.7, 132.1, 129.5 (2 C),
128.6 (2 C), 127.1 (2 C), 81.2, 42.7, 35.2 (2 C), 22.8 (2 C).
A solution of 9 (10 mg, 0.043 mmol) in anhyd EtOH (1 mL) was
treated with 10% palladium on charcoal (4 mg). Hydrogen gas was
bubbled through this solution for 10 min and the reaction mixture
was left to stir at r.t. Additional hydrogen was introduced every 4 h.
After 4 days, the catalyst was removed by filtration through a pad
of silica gel, which was rinsed in turn with EtOH. The solvent was
removed under vacuum and the residue was chromatographed [sili-
ca gel; EtOAc (3%) in hexanes] giving 9 (8.2 mg), and 7 (1.5 mg,
15%; 83% based on recovered starting material), spectroscopically
identical with the sample generated above.
ES HRMS: m/z calcd for C15H18O2Na (M + Na)+: 253.1199; found:
253.1206.
2-Benzyl-5-cycloocten-2-ol (11)
References
A solution of benzylmagnesium bromide in Et2O (0.65 mL of 0.5
M, 0.33 mmol) was added slowly to a solution of 106 (45 mg, 0.33
mmol) in anhyd Et2O (2.5 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at
r.t. for 2 days and quenched with H2O. The separated aq phase was
extracted with Et2O and the combined organic solutions were dried
and concentrated. Chromatography of the residue [silica gel; EtOAc
(5%) in hexanes] gave 11.
(1) Paquette, L. A.; Vilotijevic, I.; Hilmey, D.; Yang, J. Org.
Lett. 2003, 5, 463.
(2) (a) Overman, L. E. Acc. Chem. Res. 1980, 13, 218; and
references cited therein. (b) Patil, V. J. Tetrahedron Lett.
1996, 37, 1481.
(3) Paquette, L. A.; Zeng, Q. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 3823.
(4) Paquette, L. A.; Hofferberth, J. E. Org. React. 2003, in press.
(5) Several by-products are also generated under these longer-
term conditions. These proved to be difficult to separate and
have not been characterized.
(6) Kowar, T. R.; LeGoff, E. J. Org. Chem. 1976, 41, 3760.
(7) Allinger, N. L.; Yuh, Y. H.; Lii, J.-H. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1989, 111, 8551.
Yield: 60 mg (80%); white crystals; mp 102–103 C.
IR (CHCl3) 3363, 1690 cm–1.
1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): = 7.33–7.14 (m, 5 H), 5.72–5.67 (m,
2 H), 3.21 (d, J = 13.4 Hz, 1 H), 2.91–2.78 (m, 2 H), 2.78 (d,
J = 13.4 Hz, 1 H), 2.60 (br s, 1 H), 2.58–2.17 (m, 3 H), 2.06–1.96
(m, 1 H), 1.93–1.82 (m, 1 H), 1.66–1.55 (m, 1 H).
Synthesis 2003, No. 12, 1872–1874 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York