Communication
ISSN (Print) 0253-2964 | (Online) 1229-5949
BULLETIN OF THE
KOREAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Table 2. Asymmetric alkenyboration of aldehydes.
Scheme 3. Formation of the 5-pyrazole 7 from 2c, reagents and
conditions: (a) i. NaH, 0~20 ꢀC, THF, ii. evaporation of volatile
materials, iii. 80 ꢀC, 1 mmHg, trap at −78 ꢀC.
Entry
R1
R2
6
dra
93:7
93:7
93:7
eeb
Yieldc
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Me
Me
Me
Me
Et
Et
Et
Et
Ph
6a
6b
6c
6d
6e
6f
93
91
94
95
86
90
87
91
78
74
77
81
68
78
81
75
not been successful mainly due to a rapid formation of
5-pyrazole from 2c (Scheme 3) as a side reaction.10
n-C5H11
c-C6H11
PhCH=CH
Ph
n-C5H11
c-C6H11
PhCH=CH
In summary, this paper describes an alkenylboration pre-
pared from newly developed chiral borane 1c with (E)-
1-diazo-2-alkene 2 resulting homoallylic alcohol 6 in high
levels of enantio- and diastereoselectivity. Studies are in
progress to extend the scope of reagents, substrates, and
syntheses of biologically active natural products.
93:7
>99:1
>99:1
>99:1
>99:1
6g
6h
a Ratio of anti: syn of 6 determined by the analysis of 500 MHz
1H NMR.
Acknowledgments. The authors are grateful to Chonnam
National University (2015-3040 and 2014-2038) and the
National Research Foundation (NRF-2018R1D1A1B070
44008), and Korea for supporting this work.
b Ee values (enantiomeric excess) were determined by 1H NMR of
(+)-MTPA ester of 6 in comparison with authetic samples prepared
from (S,S)-1c.
c Isolated yield after purification by SiO2 chromatography.
Supporting Information. Additional supporting informa-
tion is Appendix S1 (Supporting Information).
reaction pathway. Therefore, it was required to develop a
method for the preparation of salt-free 2a. After surveying
several conditions, we were delighted to find a method that
the (E)-1-diazobut-2-ene 2a was trapped at −78 ꢀC from
the reaction of sodium salt of 5a at 80 ꢀC under vacuo at
1 mmHg in about 50~60% yield.8 We subsequently
observed that the use of salt free 2a in the presence of 1c at
−78 ꢀC for 2 h resulted in the formation of 3a smoothly.
Upon surveying numerous conditions as appeared in
Table 1, the following observations emerged: (1) the use of
chiral boranes 1a and 1b turned out to be unsuccessful
(entries 1–2); (2) chiral borane 1c was superior to others
and chosen for systematic studies; (3) the use of tetrahydro-
furan (THF) resulted in optimum chemical yields and
stereoselectivity in comparison to other solvents (entry 4).
With the idea that this approach could lead to a general
and effective method, we began to examine the extent of the
reaction (Table 2). In fact, this method successfully provided
6 in good yields when introducing various aldehydes. It is
noteworthy to mention that the reaction can be extend to
homologated system (R1 = Et) without problems. We
observed higher diastereoselectivity (>99:1) than crotyl sys-
tem (R1 = Me), but slightly decreased enantioselectivities
were observed as shown in Table 2. In addition, this protocol
could be a suitable tool for the synthesis of (−)-bitungolide-
A.9 However, extension to cinnamyl system (R1 = Ph) has
References
1. a) P. V. Ramachandran, P. D. Gagare, E. R. Nicponski, In
Comprehensive Organic Synthesis, Second Edition, Vol. 2,
P. Knochel, G. A. Molander Eds., Elsevier, Amsterdam,
2014, p. 1. b J. A. Marshall, Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 3163.
2. E. M. Carreira, L. Kvaerno, Classics in Stereoselective Syn-
thesis, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2009, p. 153, Chapter 5.
3. a) R. P. Sonawane, S. R. Joolakanti, S. Arseniyadis, J. Cossy,
Synlett 2009, 2009, 213. b) V. D. Sio, A. Massa, A. Scettri, Org.
Biomol. Chem. 2010, 8, 3055. c) S. Kobayashi, T. Endo,
T. Yoshino, U. Schneider, M. Ueno, Chem. Asian J. 2013,
8, 2033.
4. a) R. C. Neu, C. Jiang, D. W. Stephan, Dalton Trans. 2013, 42,
726. b) T. H. Allen, D. P. Curran, J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 2094.
5. a) J.-P. G. Seerden, M. M. M. Boeren, H. W. Scheeren, Tetra-
hedron 1997, 53, 11843. b) T. Kawate, M. Nakagawa,
T. Kakikawa, T. Hino, Tetrahedron Asymmetry 1992, 3, 227.
6. S. Heřmánek, Chem. Rev. 1992, 92, 325.
7. J. Bang, C. Oh, E. Lee, H. Jeong, J. Lee, J. Ryu, J. Kim, C.-
M. Yu, Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 1521.
8. a) Y. Zhou, B. G. Trewyn, R. J. Angelici, L. K. Woo, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 11734. b) F. Song, R. W. Darbeau,
E. H. White, J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 1825.
9. G. Dayaker, P. R. Krishna, Helv. Chim. Acta. 2014, 97, 868.
10. a) S. Cui, Y. Zhang, D. Wang, Q. Wu, Chem. Sci. 2013, 4,
3912. b) A. Padwa, Y. S. Kulkarni, Z. Zhang, J. Org. Chem.
1990, 55, 4144.
Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2019
© 2019 Korean Chemical Society, Seoul & Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
2