514
S. D. Lindell et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 14 (2004) 511–514
2. Hackler, R. E.; Suhr, R. G.; Sheets, J. J.; Hatton, C. J.;
10. Submitochondrial membranes and purified soluble
NADH:Q oxidoreductase from house fly (Musca domes-
tica) flight muscles were prepared according to previously
described methods (Lummen, P. Biochem. Soc. Transact.
1999, 27, 602). Activities of membrane bound redox
complexes were measured photometrically at l=550 nm
using either NADH (complex I+III) or succinate (com-
plex II+III) as electron donors and cytochrome c as
electron acceptor. Cytochrome oxidase was blocked by
4 mM possium cyanide. NADH oxidation by solubilised
complex I was determined photometrically at l=340 nm
with n-decylubiquinone (50 mM) as electron acceptor.
Equilibrium radioligand binding to purified house fly
complex I was performed using the labeled aminopyr-
imidine inhibitor 3H-AE F119209 (Kd=9 nM) as pre-
viously described.12 Kinetic parameters were calculated
with the SigmaPlot software (SPSS).
11. We wish to thank Dr. M. Pettett of Bayer Crop Science,
Lyon for having supplied us with a sample of compound 5
which had been prepared according to the method descri-
bed in ref 5.
12. Okun, J. G.; Lummen, P.; Brandt, U. J. Biol. Chem. 1999,
274, 2625.
13. Test for acaricidal activity against the Two Spotted Spider
Mite: Bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris) which were infested
with Tetranychus urticae (TETRUR) were dipped into an
aqueous solution of the formulated (EC 10) test com-
pound at a concentration of 300 ppm. After storage in a
controlled environment cabinet at approx. 25 ꢁC for 6
days, the % mortality was determined.
14. For other approaches to the design and synthesis of
hybrid complex I inhibitors, see: Arndt, S.; Emde, U.;
Baurle, S.; Friedrich, T.; Grubert, L.; Koert, U. Chem.
Eur. J. 2001, 7, 993. Yabunaka, H.; Kenmochi, A.;
Nakatogawa, Y.; Sakamoto, K.; Miyoshi, H. Biochim.
Biophys. Acta 2002, 1556, 106.
Johnson, P. L.; Davis, L. N.; Edie, R. G.; Kaster, S. V.;
Jourdan, G. P.; Jackson, J. L.; Krumkalns, E. V. In
Advances in the Chemistry of Insect Control III; Briggs, G.
G., Ed.; RCS: Cambridge, 1994; p. 70.
3. Hollingworth, R. M.; Ahammadsahib, K. I.; Gadelhak,
G.; McLaughlin, J. L. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 1994, 22, 230.
4. Degli Eposti, M. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1998, 1364, 222.
5. Thierbach, G.; Kunze, B.; Reichenbach, H.; Hofle, G.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1984, 765, 227.
6. Zang, Z.; Huang, L.; Shulmeister, V. M.; Chi, Y.-L.; Kim,
K. K.; Hung, L.-W.; Crofts, A. R.; Berry, E. A.; Kim,
S.-H. Nature 1998, 392, 677.
7. Osano, Y. T.; Okada, I.; Okui, S.; Matsuzaki, T. Anal.
Sci. 1991, 7, 181.
8. Energy calculations were performed based on the force-
field method using an augmented AMBER force field
(Weiner, S. J.; Kollman, P. A.; Case, D. A.; Singh, U. C.;
Ghio, C.; Alagona, G.; Profeta, S.; Weiner, P., J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 765). Gasteiger’s method (Gastei-
ger J.; Marsili, M. Tetrahedron 1980, 36, 3219) was used
to compute approximate atomic charges for the mole-
cules. To overlay the molecules, harmonic constraints
between corresponding atoms were applied. The con-
straint energy term was Econstr=2000 (dꢂ0.15)2 kJif
d
>0.15 A and it was E=0 kJif d <0.15A where d is the
distance between the corresponding atoms. The sum of all
molecular energies and constraint energies was minimised
with respect to the geometries and spatial orientation of
the molecules. Changes in geometry were restricted to
rotations about rotatable bonds. For related work on the
superimposition of different complex I inhibitors, see:
Akagi, T.; Takahashi, Y.; Sasaki, S.-S. Quant. Struct.-Act.
Relat. 1996, 15, 290.
9. Bantick, J. R.; Suschitzky, J. L. J. Heterocyclic Chem.
1981, 18, 679.