Triarylamines have also served as redox mediators for a
host of interesting transformations. For example, Steck-
han applied triarylamines to the deprotection of dithio-
acetals, the oxidation of alcohols and alkyl benzenes, and
so on.7 Fry and co-workers studied the anodic oxida-
tion of alkenes bearing one or more strongly electron-
withdrawing substituents.8 We have also performed the
triarylamine-mediated rearrangement of housanes and
have used the transformation as the key step in the total
synthesis of daucene.9
Despite the great success of triarylamines as redox
catalysts and in materials research, the synthesis of sub-
stituted frameworks can be problematic. Positional iso-
mers are frequently generated, and tedious chromatographic
separation may be required.10 Also, the low solubility of
nitro-substituted triarylamines in organic solvents restricts
their application.
Given these shortcomings, we sought to develop a new
class of organic redox catalysts subject to the conditions
that they be (a) easy to synthesize, (b) metal-free, and (c)
capable of providing access to a wide range of potentials.
In this manuscript we report that systems based on a
triarylimidazole framework fulfill these conditions and
demonstrate their applicability to the oxidation of methoxy-
substituted benzyl alcohols and benzyl ethers.
a mixture of benzils (1), aldehydes (2), methylamine, and
ammonium acetate in the presence of a catalytic amount
of sodium dihydrogen phosphate was heated to 150 °C
under solvent-free conditions. The reaction proceeds
smoothly to afford the desired triarylimidazoles in 85ꢀ92%
yield (see Supporting Information).
Cyclic voltammetry was performed first in order to
observe the electrochemical behavior of the aryl imida-
zoles. The cyclic voltammogram (CV) of triarylimidazole
3a exhibits three oxidation peaks at 1.26, 1.54, and 1.80 V
vs Ag/AgCl and one cathodic peak at 1.19 V when 0.1 M
LiClO4/CH3CN was usedas the supporting electrolyte (see
Supporting Information (SI)). We were pleased to discover
that the first oxidation peak and the reduction peak are
quasi-reversible with the current being slightly smaller
during the reduction scan. These observations indicate
that the initially formed cation radical is stable on the
CV time scale. Of additional interest is the fact that
following an initial decrease in current during the first
three scans, the system settles down and the curve remains
quasi-reversible; we have gone to 20 scans without obser-
ving a significant change (see SI). This behavior contrasts
sharply with that for triphenylamine since its aminium
cation radical is known to dimerize thereby leading to a
nonreversible redox couple. It is noteworthy that the
voltammogram is completely irreversible when the imida-
zole nitrogen is not alkylated (viz., NH vs NCH3); this is
reasonable since the cation radical ought to be strongly
acidic and capable of protonating the starting material.
Similar CV behaviors were also observed for N-methyl
substituted triarylimidazoles, 3bꢀ3e, and the results are
summarized in Table 1. Note that the Pox1 values can be
correlated with the electronegativity of the substituents,
viz., the more electron-donating the substituent(s), the
easier the substrate is to oxidize. Notice too that these five
systems allow access to a potential range of 410 mV;
compare, for example, structures 3c and 3e.
The synthetic route used to access the mediators is
shown in Table 1. Thus, by following a known procedure,11
Table 1. Synthesis and Peak Potentials of Imidazole Mediators
1
2
3
Pox
Pox
Pox
Pred
med.
Ar1
Ar2
(V)
(V)
(V)
(V)
We envisioned that, similar to substituted triarylamines,
our systems might be able to serve as redox catalysts. To
explore this hypothesis, the electrochemical behavior of
triarylimidazole 3a in the presence of p-methoxy benzyl
alcohol (4a) and an excess of lutidine was investigated. As
shown in Figure 1, the anodic peak current for 3a increases
slightly when an excess of 4a is present (compare curves a
and b). When lutidine is added, the anodic peak current for
3a increases dramatically while the cathodic peak current
disappears (curve c). Since the substrate (4a) and base are
not oxidizable at the potentials shown in Figure 1 (the peak
potential of p-methoxy benzyl alcohol and 2,6-lutidine are
1.52 and 1.89 V vs Ag/AgCl, respectively), the enhanced
anodic current results from its re-entering the catalytic
cycle in the manner illustrated in Scheme 1; it is referred to
as a “catalytic current”. These observations provide clear
evidence that the mediator serves as the hole carrier and
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
p-BrPh
Ph
1.26
1.00
1.30
1.15
0.89
1.54
1.27
1.58
1.32
1.15
1.80
1.48
1.84
1.70
1.36
1.19
0.92
1.17
0.71
1.05
p-BrPh
p-MeO-Ph
p-BrPh
Ph
p-BrPh
p-MeO-Ph
p-MeO-Ph
p-MeO-Ph
(4) Stolka, M.; Yanus, J. F.; Pai, D. M. J. Phys. Chem. 1984, 88, 4707.
(5) Thomas, B.; David, C.; Muller, M. G.; Klaus, M.; Oskar, N.
Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2000, 21, 583.
(6) Moerner, W. E.; Silence, S. M. Chem. Rev. 1994, 94, 127.
(7) (a) Brinkhaus, K. G.; Steckhan, E.; Schmidt, W. Acta Chem.
Scand., Ser. B 1983, 37, 499. (b) Schmidt, W.; Steckhan, E. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1978, 17, 673. (c) Schmidt, W.; Steckhan, E. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 1979, 18, 801. (d) Dapperheld, S.; Steckhan, E. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1982, 21, 780. (e) Platen, M.; Steckhan, E. Chem.
Ber. 1984, 117, 1679. (f) Haberl, U.; Steckhan, E.; Blechert, S.; Wiest, O.
Chem.;Eur. J. 1999, 5, 2859.
(8) (a) Wu, X.; Davis, A. P.; Lambert, P. C.; Steffen, L. K.; Toy, O.;
Fry, A. J. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 2408. (b) Mayers, B. T.; Fry, A. J. Org.
Lett. 2006, 8, 411. (c) Wu, X.; Davis, A. P.; Fry, A. J. Org. Lett. 2007, 9,
5633.
(10) (a) Wu, X.; Dube, M. A.; Fry, A. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47,
7667. (b) Lartia, R.; Allain, C.; Bordeau, G.; Schmidt, F.; Fiorini-
Debuisschert, C.; Charra, F.; Teulade-Fichou, M.-P. J. Org. Chem.
2008, 73, 1732.
(9) (a) Park, Y. S.; Wang, S. C.; Tantillo, D. J.; Little, R. D. J. Org.
Chem. 2007, 72, 4351. (b) Gerken, J. B.; Wang, S. C.; Preciado, A. B.;
Park, Y. S.; Nishiguchi, G.; Tantillo, D. J.; Little, R. D. J. Org. Chem.
2005, 70, 4598. (c) Park, Y. S.; Little, R. D. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 6807.
(11) Karimi-Jaberi, Z.; Barekat, M. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2010, 21, 1183.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 5, 2012
1315