Mendeleev Commun., 2009, 19, 84–86
for one of them. The structure of 2a was finally proved by
S(2)
X-ray analysis of closely related analogue 2f (see below).
We extended the reaction with benzylamine to other 1,2,3-di-
thiazole-5-thiones 1. 1,2,5-Thiadiazolothiones 2 were obtained
in all reactions in moderate yields† (Scheme 1).
S(3)
C(1)
C(4)
C(5)
C(13')
N(2)
C(3)
C(6) C(7)
C(8)
C(12)
C(11)
C(2)
C(13)
The structure of thieno derivative 2f was confirmed by X-ray
diffraction analysis‡ (Figure 1). The bond lengths and angles of
the thiadiazole ring, except for S(1)–N(1) and N(1)–C(2)
bonds, fall into the range typical of such a type of heterocyclic
compounds. Close investigation of the molecular geometry of 2f
revealed the significant contribution of a betaine-like resonance
form with formal single N(1)–C(2) and double N(1)–S(1)
bonds. Moreover, when the standard dataset with 2q below 60°
was used, in the crystal of 2f the unexpected elongation [up to
1.543(4) Å] of presumably double C(3)–C(13) bond was
observed. The addition of high-angle data (2q < 90°) resulted in
the molecule of 2f being the superposition (80:20) of two
isomers with cisoid and transoid dispositions of S(2) and S(3)
atoms (Figure 1). The cis form (cis-2f) appears to be stabilized
by the extremely short intermolecular contact between sulfur of
the C=S group and one of the thiophene ring [S···S 3.1812(7) Å,
C(4)–S(3)–S(2) 171.33(6)°], accompanied by charge transfer
from the lone pair (Lp) of the S(2) atom to the σ* orbital of the
C–S bond. In turn, S(3') of the minor component (trans-2f)
presumably binds to the N(1) thiadiazole atom [S···N 2.9342(8) Å,
S(1)–N(1)–S(4) 175.95(6) Å] through charge transfer from one
of the sulfur Lps to the σ* orbital of S(1)–N(1) bond. Quantum
chemical calculations (B3LYP/6-311+G*)§ and subsequent topo-
logical analysis of theoretical electron density functions7 for
two isomers have shown that the cisoid-form is stabilized by the
S···S interaction, which contributes 2.9 kcal mol–1, as estimated by
Espinosa’s correlation scheme.8,9 In the second isomer instead
of S···N–C interaction the weaker (1.8 kcal mol–1) C(13')–H···S(2)
binding is observed. On the other hand, trans-2f was found to be
C(9)
N(1)
S(3')
C(10)
S(1)
A
C(4)
C(5)
C(3)
C(4)
C(5)
C(13)
S(3)
S(2)
S(2)
C(13')
C(3)
C(2)
N(1)
C(2)
S(3')
C(1)
C(1)
N(2)
N(2)
S(1)
N(1)
C(6)
C(6)
C(7)
C(7)
S(1)
C(8)
C(9)
C(12)
C(12)
C(11)
C(8)
C(9)
C(11)
C(10)
C(10)
B
C
Figure 1 General view of compound 2f (A), which is a superposition of
two isomers: cis-2f (B) and trans-2f (C) in a ratio of 4:1, with representa-
tion of atoms via thermal ellipsoids at 50% probability level. Selected bond
lengths (Å): C(1)–S(2) 1.6799(7), S(1)–N(1) 1.6222(6), S(1)–N(2) 1.6887(6),
N(1)–C(2) 1.3228(9), C(1)–C(2) 1.4614(10), C(1)–N(2) 1.3526(9), C(2)–C(3)
1.4521(10), N(2)–C(6) 1.4675(9); selected bond angles (°): C(2)–C(1)–N(2)
106.73(6), C(1)–C(2)–N(1) 114.65(6), C(2)–N(1)–S(1) 112.07(5), N(1)–S(1)–
N(2) 93.14(3), C(1)–N(2)–S(1) 113.36(5), C(1)–C(2)–C(3) 126.23(6).
a little more stable (0.63 kcal mol–1) than cis-2f, apparently,
owing to conjugation between thiadiazole and thiophene cycles
that is more pronounced in the case of the transoid-form.
The N(1) atom of both isomers participates in the formation
of the N···S–N interaction [S···N 2.9045(8) Å, N(1')–S(1)–N(2)
168.56(7) Å] with the charge being transferred from the nitrogen
Lp to the σ* orbital of the latter bond that leads to the dimeriza-
tion of the neighbouring molecules. These supramolecular asso-
ciates are assembled into a 3D framework by a number of weak
S···H, π···π and S···S contacts.
It was envisaged that 1,2,3-dithiazole-5-thiones 7 on reaction
with primary amines should give ketones 8. We checked this
possibility by treatment of dithiazolone 7a with benzylamine,
but it turned out that the formation of 1,2,5-dithiazolone 8a is
complicated by formation of a by-product, N-substituted 2-oxo-
acetamide 9a (Scheme 2).
To obtain thiadiazolone 8a selectively, the reaction between
7a (R = Ph) and benzylamine was investigated in detail; the
nature of the solvent appeared crucial for successful reaction. If
the reaction was carried out in an inert solvent such as chloro-
form, starting dithiazolone 7a was isolated in a practically
quantitative yield. Attempts to employ strong aprotic dipolar
solvents such as DMF or acetonitrile at room temperature led to
formation of the mixtures of 8 and 9 in a ratio of 1:1 or 1:2,
respectively. Treatment of benzylamine with 7a in absolute THF
gave selectively 1,2,5-thiadiazolone 8a in quantitative yield. We
then extended these conditions to other ketones 7. 1,2,5-Thia-
diazolones 8 were obtained in high yields in practically all
8b: yield 100%, colourless crystals, mp 72–74 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz,
CDCl3) d: 5.03 (s, 2H, CH2), 6.99 (d, 2H, Ar, J 8.80 Hz), 7.39 (m, 5H,
Ar), 8.46 (d, 2H, Ar, J 8.80 Hz). 13C NMR (75.5 MHz, CDCl3) d: 47.8
(CH2), 115.4, 115.7, 126.7, 128.7, 129.1 (9CH, Ar), 125.8, 134.7, 148.4,
161.1, 165.7 (5sp2 tertiary C). MS (EI, 70 eV) m/z (%): 286 (M+, 100),
256 (20), 173 (5), 121 (87). Found (%): C, 63.08; H, 3.92; N, 9.55. Calc.
for C15H11FN2OS (%): C, 62.92; H, 3.87; N, 9.78.
8c: yield 100%, colourless crystals, mp 68–72 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz,
CDCl3) d: 3.87 (s, 3H, Me), 5.03 (s, 2H, CH2), 7.14 (m, 2H, Ar), 7.39
(m, 5H, Ar), 8.49 (m, 2H, Ar). 13C NMR (75.5 MHz, CDCl3) d: 47.9
(CH2), 113.9, 128.6, 128.7, 128.9, 129.2 (9CH, Ar), 125.2, 134.9, 149.2,
161.3, 161.4 (5sp2 tertiary C). MS (EI, 70 eV) m/z (%): 298 (M+, 43),
256 (– S, 12), 160 (5), 133 (45). Found (%): C, 64.65; H, 4.92; N, 9.55.
Calc. for C16H14N2O2S (%): C, 64.41; H, 4.73; N, 9.39.
‡
Crystallographic data. Crystals of 2f (C13H10N2S3, M = 290.41) are
monoclinic, space group P21/c, at 100 K: a = 12.6684(3), b = 13.9186(7)
and c = 7.4243(5) Å, b = 104.972(5)°, V = 1264.66(11) Å3, Z = 4 (Z' = 1),
dcalc = 1.525 g cm–3, m(MoKα) = 5.66 cm–1, F(000) = 600. Intensities of
50901 reflections were measured with a Bruker SMART APEX2 CCD
diffractometer [l(MoKα) = 0.71072 Å, w-scans, 2q < 90°] and 10363
independent reflections [Rint = 0.0458] were used in further refinement.
The structure was solved by direct method and refined by the full-matrix
least-squares technique against F2 in the anisotropic-isotropic approxi-
mation. The positions of hydrogen atoms were calculated, and they were
refined in an isotropic approximation in riding model. The molecule is
disordered by two positions with the 80:20 ratio. For 2f, the refinement
converged to wR2 = 0.0927 and GOF = 1.003 for all independent reflec-
tions [R1 = 0.0355 was calculated against F for 7426 observed reflec-
tions with I > 2s(I)]. All calculations were performed using SHELXTL
PLUS 5.0.
§
DFT calculations of the isolated cis-2f and trans-2f were performed
with the Gaussian0310 program package using the B3LYP functional.
Full optimization of the molecules was carried out with the 6-311+G*
basis set starting from the X-ray structural data. As convergence criteria,
the standard threshold limits of 4.5×10–4 and 1.8×10–3 a.u. were applied
for the maximum force and displacement, respectively. The topological
analysis of computed electron densities was performed using the AIM2000
program packages.11
CCDC 723464 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this
paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge
For details, see ‘Notice to Authors’, Mendeleev Commun., Issue 1, 2009.
– 85 –