760
C. Blanc, F. Agbossou-Niedercorn / Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 15 (2004) 757–761
Chapter 31.1; (c) Noyori, R. Asymmetric Catalysis in
Organic Synthesis; Wiley: New York, 1994; (d) Hayashi,
T.; Yamasaki, K. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 2829; Review on
copper catalyzed organozinc additions: Feringa, B. L.;
Naasz, R.; Imbos, R.; Arnold, L. A. In Modern Organo-
copper Chemistry; Krause, N., Ed.; Wiley-VCH GmbH:
Weinheim, 2002; p 224, Chapter 7; (e) Alexakis, A.;
Benhaim, C.. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 3221; (f) Sibi, M.
P.; Manyem, S.. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 8033; (g) Krause,
N.; Hoffmann-Roder, A.. Synthesis 2001, 171.
By lowering the initial concentration of the chiral cata-
lyst to 0.5 mol %, the ee of the addition product 12
increased slightly to 67% (Dee ¼ +4%) (entry 14 vs 4),
whereas, an increase of the concentration to 2.5% led to
a little drop of the ee was observed (Dee ¼ )2%) (entry
15 vs 4). As mentioned by Feringa and co-workers,
copper complexes at different concentrations may form
different catalytic species leading to different selectivi-
ties.6
3. (a) Ahn, K. H.; Klassen, R. B.; Lippard, S. J. Organomet-
allics 1990, 9, 3178; (b) Villacorta, G. M.; Rao, C. P.;
Lippard, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 3175; (c) Van
Klaveren, M.; Lambert, F.; Eijkelkamp, D. J. F. M.; Grove,
D. M.; van Koten, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 6135; (d)
Van Koten, G. Pure Appl. Chem. 1994, 66, 1455; (e)
Spescha, M.; Rihs, G. Helv. Chim. Acta 1993, 76, 1219; (f)
Kanai, M.; Tomioka, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 4275;
(g) Tanaka, K.; Matsui, J.; Suzuki, H. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. I 1993; 153; (h) Zhou, Q.-L.; Pfaltz, A Tetrahedron
1994, 50, 4467; (i) Feringa, B. L.; de Vries, A. H. M. In
Advances in Catalytic Processes; Doyle, M. D., Ed.; Jai:
Connecticut, USA, 1995, Vol. 1, p 151; (j) Jansen, J. F. G.
A.; Feringa, B. L. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1989, 741;
(k) Jansen, J. F. G. A.; Feringa, B. L. J. Org. Chem. 1990,
55, 4168; (l) Seebach, D.; Jeache, G.; Pichoto, A.; Auder-
gon, L. Helv. Chim. Acta 1997, 80, 2515; (m) Stangeland, E.
L.; Sammakia, T. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 16503.
4. (a) Soai, K.; Hayasaka, T.; Ugajin, S.; Yokoyama, S.
Chem. Lett. 1988, 1571; (b) Soai, K.; Okuda, M.;
Okamoto, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 95; (c) Soai,
K.; Yokoma, S.; Hayasaka, T.; Ebihara, K. J. Org. Chem.
1988, 53, 4148; (d) Soai, K.; Hayasaka, T.; Ugajin, S.
Chem. Commun. 1989, 516; (e) Bolm, C.; Ewald, M.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 5011; (f) Bolm, C.; Ewald, M.;
Felder, M. Chem. Ber. 1992, 125, 1205; (g) De Vries, A. H.
M.; Imbos, R.; Feringa, B. L. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
1997, 8, 1467; (h) Jansen, J. F. G. A.; Feringa, B. L.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1992, 3, 581; (i) Fujisawa, T.;
Itoh, S.; Shimizu, M. Chem. Lett. 1994, 297.
The results show that both the chiral oxazoline and the
chiral aminophosphine units have an influence on the
enantioselectivity of the process. The stereochemical
outcome of the reaction seems however to be essentially
related to the configuration of the aminophosphine
residue as the chirality is imposed by the aminophos-
phine framework alone. Indeed, the absolute stereo-
chemistry of the addition product is the same in all cases
where homochiral aminophosphine skeletons have been
used.
Under similar catalytic conditions, the conjugate addi-
tion of diethyl zinc to chalcone 11 provided the addition
product 13 with overall lower selectivities, up to 30% ee
in the presence of 1b (entries 16–18). This feature is
frequently observed while comparing the selectivities of
the addition to this two substrates 10 and 11.
In summary, we have described the easy preparation of
new aminophosphine–oxazolines and their use in cop-
per-catalysed conjugate additions to enones. The selec-
tivities induced by these new chiral auxiliaries are in line
with the behaviour of other bidentate auxiliaries con-
taining a phosphine. The potential of the reported
auxiliaries in other asymmetric transformations is under
investigation in our laboratory.
5. Alexakis, A.; Frutos, J.; Mangeney, P. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 1993, 4, 2427.
6. De Vries, A. H. M.; Meetsma, A.; Feringa, B. L. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 2374.
7. Feringa, B. L. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 346.
Acknowledgements
8. Keller, E.; Maurer, J.; Naasz, R.; Schader, T.; Meetsma,
A.; Feringa, B. L. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1998, 9, 2409.
9. Arnold, L. A.; Imbos, R.; Maudoli, A.; De Vries, A.;
Naasz, R.; Feringa, B. L. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 2865.
10. (a) Yan, M.; Chan, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 6645;
We thank CNRS and MEN (grant to C.B.) for financial
support.
ꢀ
(b) Pamies, O.; Dieguez, M.; Net, G.; Ruiz, A.; Claver, C.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2000, 11, 4377.
References and notes
11. Knochel, A.; Escher, I.; Pfaltz, A. Synlett 1997, 1429.
12. (a) Degrado, S. J.; Mizutani, H.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 755; (b) Mizutani, H.; Degrado,
S. J.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 779.
13. Agbossou-Niedercorn, F.; Suisse, I. Coord. Chem. Rev.
2003, 242, 145.
1. (a) General reviews on 1,4-conjugate addition: Perlmutter,
P. In Conjugate Addition Reactions in Organic Synthesis;
Baldwin, J. E.; Magnus, P. D., Eds.; Tetrahedron Organic
Chemistry Series no. 9; Pergamon: Oxford; 1992; (b)
Schmalz, H.-G. In Comprehenvise Organic Synthesis;
Trost, B. M., Flemming, I., Eds.; Pergamon: Oxford,
1991; (c)Yamamoto, Y. In Stereoselective Synthesis;
Methods Org. Chem. (Houben-Weyl); Helmchen, G.;
Hoffmann, R. W.; Mulzer, J.; Schauman, E., Eds.;
Thieme: Stuttgart–New York, 1995; Vol. 4, p 2041; (d)
Rossiter, B. E.; Swingle, N. M. Chem. Rev. 1992, 92, 771.
2. (a) General reviews on asymmetric 1,4-conjugate addition:
Ojima, I. Catalytic Asymmetric Synthesis II; Wiley-VCH:
New York, 2000; (b) Tomioka, K.; Nagaoka, Y. In
Comprehensive Asymmetric Catalysis; Jacobsen, E. N.,
Pfaltz, A., Yamamoto, H., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, 1999,
14. Blanc, C.; Hannedouche, J.; Agbossou-Niedercorn, F.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 6469.
15. 9a: RMN 1H (300 MHz, CDCl3): d 0.76 (d, J ¼ 6:8 Hz,
3H, CH3); 0.87 (d, J ¼ 6:8 Hz, 3H, CH3); 1.55 (sext,
J ¼ 6:8 Hz, 1H, CH(CH3)2); 3.08 (dapp, J ¼ 16:2 Hz, 1H,
CHH0); 3.57 (dd, 1H, J ¼ 16:0 and 10.4 Hz, CHH0); 3.67
(dd, J ¼ 17:0 and 8.8 Hz, 1H, N–CH); 3.77 (tapp, 1H,
J ¼ 8:5 Hz, CHH0–O); 4.06 (dd, J ¼ 9:8 and 8.4 Hz,
1H, CHH0–O); 4.89 (m, 1H, CH); 6.38 (d, J ¼ 7:5 Hz,
1H, Harom); 6.85 (m, 1H, Harom); 7.15 (m, 1H, Harom); 7.32
(m, 1H, Harom); 7.45–7.54 (m, 6H, Harom); 7.80–7.97 (m,