Journal of Inorganic and General Chemistry
ARTICLE
Zeitschrift für anorganische und allgemeine Chemie
“very strong” (vs), “strong” (s), “medium” (m), “weak” (w) and “very Pentanitrobenzene (3):[7] 2,3,4,6-Tetranitroaniline (2) (500 mg,
weak” (vw). NMR spectra were recorded with JEOL Eclipse and 1.83 mmol) was dissolved in oleum (25.0 mL, 20–25 wt% SO3) and
Bruker TR 400 MHz spectrometers at 25 °C. Chemical shifts were de-
termined in relation to external standards Me4Si (1H, 399.8 MHz; 13C,
the solution was cooled to 5 °C. H2O2 (2.70 mL, 98%) was added
dropwise keeping the temperature below 25 °C. The suspension was
100.5 MHz); MeNO2 (14N, 28.9 MHz) and are given in parts per mil- stirred for 24 h at 25–30 °C and for 1 h at 0 °C. Afterwards, the reac-
lion (ppm). Elemental analyses (CHN) were obtained with
Vario EL Elemental Analyzer.
a
tion mixture was extracted with DCM (5ϫ50 mL) and the solvent was
evaporated. The resulting yellow solid was recrystallized from cold
DCM (15 mL) to afford pale yellow crystalline needles (295 mg, 53%)
which were filtered, washed with ice-cold DCM and dried in vacuo
for 5 h. 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ = 9.12 (s, 1 H, CH). 1H NMR (CD2Cl2):
The sensitivity data were acquired by measurements with a BAM
drophammer and a BAM friction tester.[1] Melting and decomposition
points were determined by differential thermal analysis (DTA) using
an OZM Research DTA 552-Ex instrument with Meavy 2.1.2 software.
The samples (3–15 mg) were measured in open glass tubes (diameter
4 mm, length about 47 mm) at a heating rate of 5 K·min–1 in the range
of 15–400 °C. The temperatures are given as onset temperatures.
1
δ = 9.21 (s, 1 H, CH). H NMR ([D6]acetone): δ = 9.69 (s, 1 H, CH).
13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3): δ = 141.4 (br., ortho-C rel. to CH), 139.8 [t,
1J(C-14N) = 14.3 Hz, meta-C rel. to CH], 137.8 [t, 1J(C-14N) =
14.1 Hz, para-C rel. to CH], 125.9 (s, CH). 13C NMR (CD2Cl2): δ =
1
1
141.8 (br., ortho-C rel. to CH), 140.3 [dt, J(C-H) = 7.5, J(C-14N) =
14.3 Hz, meta-C rel. to CH], 138.2 [t, 1J(C-14N) = 14.1 Hz, para-C rel.
to CH], 127.1 [d, J(C-H) = 183.5 Hz, CH]. 14N NMR (CD2Cl2): δ =
Crystal Structure Determination: The crystal structure data were
obtained with an Oxford Xcalibur CCD Diffractometer with a
KappaCCD detector at low temperature (143 K and 103 K). Mo-Kα
radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å) was delivered by a Spellman generator (volt-
age 50 kV, current 40 mA). Data collection and reduction were per-
formed using the CRYSALIS CCD[15] and CRYSALIS RED[16] soft-
ware, respectively. The structures were solved by SIR92/SIR97[17] (di-
rect methods) and refined using the SHELX-97[18] software, both im-
plemented in the program package WinGX22.[19] Finally, all structures
were checked using the PLATON software.[20] Structures displayed
with ORTEP plots are drawn with thermal ellipsoids at 50% prob-
ability level.
1
–33.5 (ortho-NO2 rel. to CH), –36.6 (meta-NO2 rel. to CH), –37.2
(para-NO2 rel. to CH) ppm. IR (ATR): ν˜ = 3080 (w, νCH), 1606 (w),
1555 (vs, νNO2), 1393 (w), 1325 (vs, νNO2), 1307 (m), 1167 (w), 926
(m), 890 (s), 832 (w), 817 (m), 804 (m), 789 (w), 769 (w), 725 (m),
716 (w) cm–1. Raman (502 mW): ν˜ = 3083 (w), 1610 (w), 1593 (w),
1569 (m), 1360 (s), 1338 (m), 1201 (w), 833 (vs) cm–1. C6HN5O10
(303.10 g·mol–1): calcd.: C 23.78, H 0.33, N 23.11%; found: C 23.84,
H 0.47, N 22.82%. Melting point: 143 °C; Dec. point: 220 °C. Sensi-
tivities (BAM): IS:5 J, FS: 96 N, ESD: 63 mJ (grain size 100–500 μm).
Acknowledgements
The theoretical calculations were achieved by using the Gaussian 09
program package[13] and were visualized by using GaussView 5.08.[21]
Optimizations and frequency analyses were performed at the B3LYP
level of theory (Becke’s B3 three parameter hybrid functional by using
the LYP correlation functional) with a cc-pVDZ basis set. After cor-
recting the optimized structures with zero-point vibrational energies,
the enthalpies and free energies were calculated on the CBS-4M (com-
plete basis set) level of theory.[22] The detonation parameters were
obtained by using the EXPLO5 (V6.03) program package.[14,23]
We would like to thank the following co-workers for X-ray determi-
nation measurements and refinements: Prof. Konstantin Karaghiosoff,
Dr. Peter Mayer, as well as M.Scs. Cornelia Unger and Jörn Martens.
Financial support of this work by the Ludwig-Maximilian University
of Munich (LMU), the Office of Naval Research (ONR) under grant
no. ONR.N00014–16–1-2062, and the Bundeswehr – Wehrtechnische
Dienststelle für Waffen und Munition (WTD 91) under grant no.
E/E91S/FC015/CF049 is gratefully acknowledged. The authors
acknowledge collaborations with Dr. Mila Krupka (OZM Research,
Czech Republic) in the development of new testing and evaluation
methods for energetic materials and with Dr. Muhamed Suceska (Brod-
arski Institute, Croatia) in the development of new computational
codes to predict the detonation and propulsion parameters of novel
explosives. We thank Evonik Industries AG for a generous gift of 98%
hydrogen peroxide.
Crystallographic data (excluding structure factors) for the structures in
this paper have been deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic
Data Centre, CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB21EZ, UK.
Copies of the data can be obtained free of charge on quoting the
depository numbers CCDC-1866511 (for 2), CCDC-1866506 (for 3),
and CCDC-1866507 (for 4) (Fax: +44-1223-336-033; E-Mail:
deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk, http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk).
CAUTION! The benzene derivatives 2–4 are energetic materials and
show sensitivities in the range of secondary explosives! They should
be handled with caution during synthesis or manipulation and ad-
ditional protective equipment (leather jacket, face shield, ear protec-
tion, Kevlar gloves) is strongly recommended.
Keywords: Energetic materials; Oxidizer; Polynitrobenzenes;
NMR spectroscopy; X-ray diffraction
References
2,3,4,6-Tetranitroaniline (2):[9] A solution of 3-nitroaniline (1)
(4.00 g, 29.0 mmol) in sulfuric acid (40 mL, 96%) was heated to 60–
65 °C. A mixture of nitric acid (4.5 mL, 99.5%) and oleum (13 mL,
20–25 wt% SO3) was added dropwise to the solution keeping the tem-
perature below 80 °C. The reaction mixture was allowed to cool to
room temperature and stirred for 45 h at ambient temperature before
pouring on crushed ice. The precipitating yellow solid (3.59 g, 45%)
[1] T. M. Klapötke, Chemistry of High-Energy Materials, De Gruyter,
Berlin, 2017.
[2] J. P. Agrawal, High Energy Materials, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim,
2010.
[3] Q. J. Axthammer, T. M. Klapötke, B. Krumm, R. Moll, S. F. Rest,
Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2014, 640, 76–83.
[4] T. M. Klapötke, B. Krumm, T. Reith, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2017,
643, 1474–1481.
[5] T. M. Klapötke, B. Krumm, T. Reith, Propellants Explos. Pyro-
tech. 2018, 43, 685–693.
[6] A. T. Nielsen, Nitrocarbons (Organic Nitro Chemistry), Wiley-
VCH, Weinheim, 1995.
1
was filtered, washed with cold water and dried in vacuo for 10 h. H
NMR ([D6]acetone): δ = 9.30 (s, 1 H, CH), 8.88 (s, 2 H, NH2);
13C{1H} NMR ([D6]acetone): δ = 143.6 (CNH2), 142.8/133.5/130.3/
126.4 (br., CNO2), 129.1 (s, CH). 14N NMR ([D6]acetone): δ =
–19/–24/–25/–26 (NO2), –294 (NH2) ppm.
Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 0000, 0–0
6
© 0000 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim